# memory_jobs

id: 8bd0134b-1ed6-4008-a443-61756c966d6c
memory_id: 2b274087-c597-48a8-8ce7-25d0bd7ee849
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T06:07:57.080Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T06:08:23.214Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T05:37:54.755Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T06:08:23.214Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The listSecrets() function should be called in packages/daemon/src/hooks.ts after the status update (approximately line 862) to surface available secret names with usage instructions at session start","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"listSecrets()","relationship":"called_in","target":"packages/daemon/src/hooks.ts","confidence":0.95},{"source":"session_start","relationship":"triggers","target":"listSecrets() invocation","confidence":0.9},{"source":"listSecrets()","relationship":"surfaces","target":"available_secret_names_with_usage_instructions","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Candidate #5 (ID: 2b274087-c597-48a8-8ce7-25d0bd7ee849) already contains this exact fact verbatim: 'Call `listSecrets()` in `packages/daemon/src/hooks.ts` after status update (~line 862) to surface available secret names with usage instructions at session start.' No new information to capture.","fact":{"content":"The listSecrets() function should be called in packages/daemon/src/hooks.ts after the status update (approximately line 862) to surface available secret names with usage instructions at session start","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 024311f4-bd40-4fc4-8ba9-adf71618ca48
memory_id: af53fd8c-06b1-43fe-bddc-96931035cd61
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T06:08:25.219Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T06:09:22.517Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T05:37:54.765Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T06:09:22.517Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The `signet secret get` CLI command was deliberately NOT implemented","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The `signet secret get` CLI command was not implemented because exposing raw secret values via CLI would violate the Signet security model","type":"rationale","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The development session began by reading existing source files to understand implementation patterns before writing code changes","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"signet secret get CLI","relationship":"NOT_implemented","target":"Signet CLI","confidence":0.95},{"source":"raw secret value exposure","relationship":"violates","target":"Signet security model","confidence":0.95},{"source":"development session","relationship":"follows","target":"read-source-files-first pattern","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Candidate [3] already explicitly captures this decision: 'Deliberate non-action: no `signet secret get` CLI implementation—exposing raw values violates security model.' The new fact is already covered.","fact":{"content":"The `signet secret get` CLI command was deliberately NOT implemented","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents this exact design decision: deliberate non-implementation of `signet secret get` CLI due to security model constraints. New fact is redundant and adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The `signet secret get` CLI command was not implemented because exposing raw secret values via CLI would violate the Signet security model","type":"rationale","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"delete","targetMemoryId":"3bce199c-5278-418c-ac64-11d9c27064de","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact states 'before writing code changes', directly contradicting the memory that 'No code changes were made during this session'. The new procedural observation (confidence 0.9) indicates code changes did occur.","fact":{"content":"The development session began by reading existing source files to understand implementation patterns before writing code changes","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"No code changes were made during this session"}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":1,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: e2bd564f-0c8a-4221-95ea-07813d6d93f3
memory_id: 2b51a72f-0941-40e6-86cf-f5907334a048
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T06:26:15.845Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T06:27:34.978Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T06:26:14.742Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T06:27:34.978Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"OpenMarketUI is fundamentally a trading strategy IDE (Integrated Development Environment), not a prediction market trading platform/engine as initially characterized","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"OpenMarketUI is an interface-first product designed to enable users to build heuristic algorithms for trading strategies","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"OpenMarketUI supports training custom trading models as part of its core functionality","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"OpenMarketUI manages the full strategy lifecycle from algorithm development through model training to execution, with emphasis on user-friendliness and performance","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The product positioning was clarified by the user from 'prediction market trading platform/engine' to 'trading strategy IDE', representing a correction of initial understanding","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"OpenMarketUI","relationship":"is","target":"trading strategy IDE","confidence":0.95},{"source":"OpenMarketUI","relationship":"is not","target":"prediction market trading platform/engine","confidence":0.9},{"source":"OpenMarketUI","relationship":"enables building","target":"heuristic algorithms","confidence":0.95},{"source":"OpenMarketUI","relationship":"supports training","target":"custom trading models","confidence":0.95},{"source":"OpenMarketUI","relationship":"emphasizes","target":"user-friendly interface","confidence":0.95},{"source":"OpenMarketUI","relationship":"emphasizes","target":"performance","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact fact in comprehensive detail: OpenMarketUI is characterized as a trading strategy IDE with full explanation of its positioning (interface-first product for building heuristic algorithms, training models, managing strategy lifecycle). The new fact is a condensed restatement of information already documented.","fact":{"content":"OpenMarketUI is fundamentally a trading strategy IDE (Integrated Development Environment), not a prediction market trading platform/engine as initially characterized","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [2b51a72f...] already captures this fact comprehensively: 'OpenMarketUI is fundamentally a trading strategy IDE — an interface-first product for users to build heuristic algorithms...' This existing memory includes the core positioning and is more detailed than the new fact.","fact":{"content":"OpenMarketUI is an interface-first product designed to enable users to build heuristic algorithms for trading strategies","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact concept: OpenMarketUI is described as a 'trading strategy IDE' with core ability to 'train custom trading models.' The new fact is redundant with existing, more comprehensive memory.","fact":{"content":"OpenMarketUI supports training custom trading models as part of its core functionality","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"This fact is already comprehensively covered by candidate 2b51a72f, which states that OpenMarketUI is 'a trading strategy IDE for users to build heuristic algorithms, train custom trading models, and manage the full strategy lifecycle from a user-friendly, performant UI.' The new fact restates the same core positioning with slightly different phrasing (algorithm development → model training → execution vs. algorithm building → model training → lifecycle management), but adds no new information not already captured.","fact":{"content":"OpenMarketUI manages the full strategy lifecycle from algorithm development through model training to execution, with emphasis on user-friendliness and performance","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is comprehensively covered by candidate [5], which explicitly documents the same positioning correction (from 'prediction market trading platform/engine' to 'trading strategy IDE'). No new information or update needed.","fact":{"content":"The product positioning was clarified by the user from 'prediction market trading platform/engine' to 'trading strategy IDE', representing a correction of initial understanding","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 445c6909-70f5-4c6a-a520-dfbb329f8266
memory_id: e471db5c-04f1-4db3-8987-452f1c3ec0ea
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T06:27:37.010Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T06:28:04.234Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T06:26:14.781Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T06:28:04.234Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A plan to integrate Signet secrets with MCP was being implemented in this session to enable agents to use Signet secrets","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"Signet Secrets","relationship":"integrates with","target":"MCP","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Agents","relationship":"can access","target":"Signet Secrets","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidates [2] and [5] already capture this procedural fact about a session implementing Signet secrets MCP integration. The new fact adds no novel information.","fact":{"content":"A plan to integrate Signet secrets with MCP was being implemented in this session to enable agents to use Signet secrets","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: d9771c35-9d1c-4515-8ece-e65433401b79
memory_id: 189ff7fe-3ad9-4b9a-812f-cbce62743915
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T06:28:06.235Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T06:29:21.750Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T06:26:14.793Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T06:29:21.750Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Signet documentation references a non-existent `signet secret get` CLI command","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Signet session initialization does not provide a secret discovery mechanism to agents","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"No MCP tools exist for agent interaction with secrets in Signet","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Agents are informed about the existence of secrets in Signet but lack the technical ability to retrieve and use them","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"Signet documentation","relationship":"references (non-existent)","target":"`signet secret get` CLI command","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet session initialization","relationship":"does not provide","target":"secret discovery mechanism","confidence":0.9},{"source":"MCP tools","relationship":"do not exist for","target":"secrets interaction","confidence":0.95},{"source":"agents","relationship":"are unable to use","target":"secrets","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"The new fact is already comprehensively covered by existing memory [4], which explicitly identifies 'the documentation references a non-existent `signet secret get` CLI command' as a core problem in the secrets workflow. No new information or refinement is added.","fact":{"content":"Signet documentation references a non-existent `signet secret get` CLI command","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact is already covered by candidate [5], which explicitly states 'session start provides no secret discovery' as part of the core problem with Signet secrets access","fact":{"content":"Signet session initialization does not provide a secret discovery mechanism to agents","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"New fact contradicts documented MCP tools in CLAUDE.md context (secret_list and secret_exec are explicitly defined and available). Existing memories correctly reflect that these tools exist. The new fact is factually inaccurate and should not be stored.","fact":{"content":"No MCP tools exist for agent interaction with secrets in Signet","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already comprehensively documents this exact problem: agents are informed about secrets but cannot use them, and provides the detailed reasons why (non-existent CLI command, missing MCP tools, no session start discovery). The new fact is a higher-level restatement of the core issue already well-captured in the existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Agents are informed about the existence of secrets in Signet but lack the technical ability to retrieve and use them","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: d3240483-7d8a-41f2-8fc6-b2737251d690
memory_id: 7defd46f-bc57-44f5-b9ba-f8c56a3df42c
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T06:29:23.751Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T06:30:24.055Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T06:26:14.804Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T06:30:24.055Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The Signet block in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` contains a broken CLI reference that should be removed","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The `secret_list` MCP tool is used in Signet for discovering available secrets","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The `secret_exec` MCP tool is used in Signet for executing commands with injected secrets","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Signet's documentation should explain the workflow of using `secret_list` and `secret_exec` MCP tools instead of relying on CLI references","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"Signet block in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts`","relationship":"contains","target":"broken CLI reference","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Signet documentation","relationship":"should document","target":"`secret_list` MCP tool","confidence":0.85},{"source":"Signet documentation","relationship":"should document","target":"`secret_exec` MCP tool","confidence":0.85},{"source":"`secret_list`","relationship":"used for","target":"secret discovery workflow","confidence":0.85},{"source":"`secret_exec`","relationship":"used for","target":"secret usage and execution workflow","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing candidate [5] (ID: 7defd46f-bc57-44f5-b9ba-f8c56a3df42c) already captures this exact issue: removing the broken CLI reference from the Signet block in packages/core/src/markdown.ts. The new fact adds no new information and is already documented in memory.","fact":{"content":"The Signet block in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` contains a broken CLI reference that should be removed","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [2] directly captures this fact: 'The secret_list MCP tool in Signet enables users to discover what secrets are available in the system.' The new fact adds no new information beyond what's already stored.","fact":{"content":"The `secret_list` MCP tool is used in Signet for discovering available secrets","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 3 (ff3a8b11-23cd-45a0-abca-39bf11ebbf9a) already documents secret_exec functionality, including its purpose of running commands with injected secrets and the env var → secret name mapping. New fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The `secret_exec` MCP tool is used in Signet for executing commands with injected secrets","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"7defd46f-bc57-44f5-b9ba-f8c56a3df42c","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New decision reinforces existing issue memory. Both advocate documenting secret_list/secret_exec MCP tools instead of CLI references. Merge them into a single consolidated documentation task.","fact":{"content":"Signet's documentation should explain the workflow of using `secret_list` and `secret_exec` MCP tools instead of relying on CLI references","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"**Documentation Fix**: Update the Signet block in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` to remove the broken CLI reference and document the actual workflow: `secret_list` and `secret_exec` MCP tools for discovery and usage. 2."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: af538326-98fd-4af9-85b5-f3b2b0b07be5
memory_id: ff3a8b11-23cd-45a0-abca-39bf11ebbf9a
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T06:30:26.058Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T06:31:24.805Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T06:26:14.815Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T06:31:24.805Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Two MCP tools (secret_list and secret_exec) must be added to packages/daemon/src/mcp/tools.ts","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The secret_list MCP tool queries the GET /api/secrets endpoint to retrieve and return available secret names","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The secret_exec MCP tool runs shell commands with secrets injected as environment variables","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The secret_exec MCP tool accepts a command string and a mapping of environment variable names to secret names as input parameters","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"secret_list tool","relationship":"queries","target":"GET /api/secrets endpoint","confidence":0.95},{"source":"secret_list tool","relationship":"returns","target":"available secret names","confidence":0.95},{"source":"secret_exec tool","relationship":"injects","target":"secrets as environment variables","confidence":0.95},{"source":"secret_exec tool","relationship":"accepts","target":"command string and env var to secret name mapping","confidence":0.95},{"source":"MCP tools (secret_list, secret_exec)","relationship":"located in","target":"packages/daemon/src/mcp/tools.ts","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already comprehensively covers this decision with explicit implementation details for both secret_list and secret_exec tools in packages/daemon/src/mcp/tools.ts. The new fact is a subset of information already captured.","fact":{"content":"Two MCP tools (secret_list and secret_exec) must be added to packages/daemon/src/mcp/tools.ts","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 already documents this implementation detail: 'secret_list: queries `GET /api/secrets` to return available secret names'. The new fact is fully covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The secret_list MCP tool queries the GET /api/secrets endpoint to retrieve and return available secret names","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"ff3a8b11-23cd-45a0-abca-39bf11ebbf9a","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact directly describes secret_exec functionality already mentioned in candidate 5. The new fact provides a clearer natural-language explanation of how the tool operates (injecting secrets as environment variables), which complements the existing technical specification.","fact":{"content":"The secret_exec MCP tool runs shell commands with secrets injected as environment variables","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"**MCP Tools**: Add two tools to `packages/daemon/src/mcp/tools.ts`: - `secret_list`: queries `GET /api/secrets` to return available secret names - `secret_exec`: runs commands with injected secrets, takes command string and env var → secret name mapping 3."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already documents secret_exec parameters: 'takes command string and env var → secret name mapping', which directly matches the new fact about command string and environment variable name-to-secret mapping","fact":{"content":"The secret_exec MCP tool accepts a command string and a mapping of environment variable names to secret names as input parameters","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 8a9c06e0-8b88-445c-aa75-6e4388d6ffb2
memory_id: 7f96464e-6ec9-46cc-95ad-36cf2c73a7ed
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T06:31:36.938Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T06:32:55.669Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T06:26:15.075Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T06:32:55.669Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Signetai should be installable globally via npm using `npm install -g signetai`","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Signetai should be installable and executable via npx using `npx signetai`","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The postinstall script in the signetai package uses ECMAScript modules (ESM)","type":"fact","confidence":0.85},{"content":"ESM-based postinstall scripts are flaky and unreliable in some npm environments","type":"fact","confidence":0.85},{"content":"A plan to fix signetai npm installation compatibility involves three key changes, with the primary focus on addressing the problematic postinstall script behavior","type":"procedural","confidence":0.7}],"entities":[{"source":"signetai package","relationship":"should be installable via","target":"npm (global)","confidence":0.9},{"source":"signetai package","relationship":"should be installable via","target":"npx","confidence":0.9},{"source":"signetai postinstall script","relationship":"uses","target":"ESM","confidence":0.85},{"source":"ESM postinstall scripts","relationship":"causes flakiness in","target":"npm environments","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] (ID: f9c02338-98df-4ce0-8fac-041517545141) already explicitly covers this fact: 'Signetai is being set up for npm installation via both `npm install -g signetai` (global) and `npx signetai` (direct execution)'. The new fact is redundant and fully contained within the existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Signetai should be installable globally via npm using `npm install -g signetai`","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already covered by candidate [1] ('Signetai is installable via `npx signetai` command') which contains identical procedural information. Candidate [4] also covers this as part of a broader decision about npm installation methods.","fact":{"content":"Signetai should be installable and executable via npx using `npx signetai`","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already explicitly captures that the postinstall script currently uses ESM (stated as 'Convert... from ESM to CommonJS'). The new fact is a subset of information already contained in the existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The postinstall script in the signetai package uses ECMAScript modules (ESM)","type":"fact","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] (7f96464e) already explicitly captures this issue: 'The main issue was the postinstall script using ESM, which can be flaky in some npm environments.' The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"ESM-based postinstall scripts are flaky and unreliable in some npm environments","type":"fact","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact is already well-covered by existing candidates [3] and [5], which both document the plan to fix signetai npm installation compatibility and specifically mention the three key changes and postinstall script conversion. No new information to capture.","fact":{"content":"A plan to fix signetai npm installation compatibility involves three key changes, with the primary focus on addressing the problematic postinstall script behavior","type":"procedural","confidence":0.7}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 3ef188fe-d600-4d5b-af0e-f087c1a09f96
memory_id: cb32e729-c916-49cd-80fc-02e49896a978
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T06:32:57.671Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T06:34:11.494Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T06:26:15.137Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T06:34:11.494Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Watchtower is a React application","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Watchtower uses opentui library for terminal rendering","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Watchtower integrates Zustand for state management","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Watchtower maintains WebSocket connections to pm-server for bidirectional communication","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Architectural exploration of the watchtower codebase was performed as a precursor to implementation planning","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"Watchtower","relationship":"built-with","target":"React","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Watchtower","relationship":"uses","target":"opentui","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Watchtower","relationship":"uses","target":"Zustand","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Watchtower","relationship":"communicates-with","target":"pm-server","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"add","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact about Watchtower's technology stack (React) has no match in existing candidates. Candidate 4 discusses a different project's React/Astro setup. This warrants a new memory entry specific to Watchtower.","fact":{"content":"Watchtower is a React application","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This fact is already comprehensively covered by existing memories. Candidate [3] explicitly states watchtower is 'a React terminal UI built with opentui' and candidate [5] states 'Watchtower is currently a React application using opentui for terminal rendering'. The new fact adds no novel information.","fact":{"content":"Watchtower uses opentui library for terminal rendering","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact about Watchtower's state management library (Zustand) is distinct from existing candidate which appears to cover API route integration. This is a valuable technical detail about the project's architecture that warrants its own memory entry.","fact":{"content":"Watchtower integrates Zustand for state management","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"d49ea256-5490-4474-9723-b7b15bb63621","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact refines existing candidate [4] with more specificity about 'bidirectional' communication. Both describe the same Watchtower-pm-server WebSocket relationship. Merge into single consolidated memory.","fact":{"content":"Watchtower maintains WebSocket connections to pm-server for bidirectional communication","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"Watchtower establishes WebSocket connections to pm-server for real-time communication"},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this fact: 'Work began with architectural exploration to understand the current watchtower codebase before planning implementation.' The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Architectural exploration of the watchtower codebase was performed as a precursor to implementation planning","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":2,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":2},"warnings":[]}


id: f16c05b1-4525-4a66-a11d-4b87393f2dc6
memory_id: 51f84dc0-d10a-4d3b-8b32-ad2c0a50c427
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T07:41:44.922Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T07:42:50.976Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T07:41:43.430Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T07:42:50.976Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The engage project's dev server is configured to be started with the command `bun dev` based on project configuration","type":"fact","confidence":0.8},{"content":"When Nicholai executed `bun dev` for the engage project, the command did not work as expected","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Troubleshooting the engage project dev server failure involved reading the package.json file to investigate configuration","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The troubleshooting session for the engage project dev server was incomplete at session end with no findings or resolution documented","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"engage project","relationship":"configured with","target":"bun dev command","confidence":0.8},{"source":"bun dev command","relationship":"failed for","target":"engage project","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"reported failure of","target":"engage project dev server startup","confidence":0.9},{"source":"package.json","relationship":"investigated during","target":"engage project troubleshooting","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Existing memory [1] already contains this fact and provides richer context including the troubleshooting attempt. New fact is subsumed by the existing candidate.","fact":{"content":"The engage project's dev server is configured to be started with the command `bun dev` based on project configuration","type":"fact","confidence":0.8}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing candidate [1] already captures that `bun dev` for engage didn't work as expected. The new fact is less detailed and redundant with the existing memory, which specifically documents this troubleshooting session.","fact":{"content":"When Nicholai executed `bun dev` for the engage project, the command did not work as expected","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already comprehensively documents this exact scenario: engage dev server troubleshooting initiated by reading package.json. The new fact adds no novel information.","fact":{"content":"Troubleshooting the engage project dev server failure involved reading the package.json file to investigate configuration","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact scenario: engage dev server troubleshooting was initiated, the session ended before completion, and no resolution/findings were reached. New fact adds no novel information.","fact":{"content":"The troubleshooting session for the engage project dev server was incomplete at session end with no findings or resolution documented","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 110ffaf3-9307-45c0-a82e-daeb63992a51
memory_id: b5b7a730-2046-4564-b5a8-0c7ffae82ec8
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T09:55:16.294Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T09:56:19.049Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T09:55:14.991Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T09:56:19.049Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"No coding work was performed during the 2026-02-27 session","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The 2026-02-27 session was initialized via remote control bridge at 05:37 UTC in the signetai directory","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The SessionStart hook executed successfully during the 2026-02-27 session initialization","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The Signet agent context was loaded during the 2026-02-27 session initialization","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The 2026-02-27 session was a session initiation event with no subsequent development activity","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"2026-02-27 session","relationship":"initialized via","target":"remote control bridge","confidence":0.95},{"source":"2026-02-27 session","relationship":"location","target":"signetai directory","confidence":0.95},{"source":"SessionStart hook","relationship":"loaded","target":"Signet agent context","confidence":0.95},{"source":"SessionStart hook","relationship":"status","target":"executed successfully","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"add","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact documents 2026-02-27 session. Existing candidate [2] covers 2026-02-23 (different session). Both are session-specific notes on different dates and should be kept separate.","fact":{"content":"No coding work was performed during the 2026-02-27 session","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already contains the exact same session initialization details: 2026-02-27 date, 05:37 UTC timestamp, remote control bridge method, and signetai directory location. The new fact is fully covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The 2026-02-27 session was initialized via remote control bridge at 05:37 UTC in the signetai directory","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents the 2026-02-27 session initialization with SessionStart hook execution at 05:37 UTC in signetai. New fact adds no new information and is covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The SessionStart hook executed successfully during the 2026-02-27 session initialization","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","targetMemoryId":"b5b7a730-2046-4564-b5a8-0c7ffae82ec8","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents the 2026-02-27 session initialization with explicit mention of Signet agent context loading via SessionStart hook. New fact provides no additional detail or contradictory information.","fact":{"content":"The Signet agent context was loaded during the 2026-02-27 session initialization","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"# 2026-02-27 Session Notes No coding work was performed during this session. The session was initialized via remote control bridge at 05:37 UTC in the signetai directory. The SessionStart hook executed successfully, loading the Signet agent context. This was a session initiation event with no subsequent development activity."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing candidate [5] (b5b7a730-2046-4564-b5a8-0c7ffae82ec8) already documents the 2026-02-27 session as a session initialization event with no development activity. The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The 2026-02-27 session was a session initiation event with no subsequent development activity","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":1,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":1},"warnings":[]}


id: e64c0824-7e42-47c1-9990-e45927da16de
memory_id: 7c55e5be-8102-43a0-a0ba-c0dfda016461
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T09:58:57.107Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:00:22.326Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T09:58:55.485Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:00:22.326Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Nicholai demonstrated Signet to a friend","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Signet provides persistent memory that persists across sessions and platforms","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Signet provides agent identity that travels across different AI platforms (Claude Code, OpenCode, Cursor, etc.)","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Signet automatically injects relevant context into agent conversations","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Signet provides explicit memory commands for saving and recalling information","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Signet's core differentiation from competing solutions is its combination of persistent memory, portable agent identity, automatic context injection, and explicit memory management","type":"fact","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"demonstrated","target":"Signet","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"provides","target":"persistent memory","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"provides","target":"portable agent identity","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Signet agent identity","relationship":"travels across","target":"multiple AI platforms","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"provides","target":"automatic context injection","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"provides","target":"explicit memory commands","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"differentiates from","target":"competing solutions","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","targetMemoryId":"7c55e5be-8102-43a0-a0ba-c0dfda016461","confidence":0.98,"reason":"New fact is already covered by candidate [5], which contains detailed context about the Signet demo to a friend, including what was explained and the purpose of the demo. No new information to add.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai demonstrated Signet to a friend","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"## Signet Demo & Explanation Nicholai gave a brief demo of Signet to a friend, requesting a high-level explanation of how the system works and what differentiates it from competing solutions. Provided an explanation of Signet's core value proposition: persistent memory and agent identity that travels across AI platforms, automatic context injection, and explicit memory commands."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate 5 already captures the core concept: 'persistent memory and agent identity that travels across AI platforms.' The new fact is a simpler restatement of information already documented in memory and CLAUDE.md. Adding it separately would create redundancy without new substantive content.","fact":{"content":"Signet provides persistent memory that persists across sessions and platforms","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"1d65c1ff-20da-4715-bcd6-184f2dac9da7","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact reinforces and exemplifies the 'portable identity' aspect of the existing candidate. Merging adds concrete platform examples (Claude Code, OpenCode, Cursor) to the technical spec details already captured, creating a more complete picture of Signet's cross-platform capabilities.","fact":{"content":"Signet provides agent identity that travels across different AI platforms (Claude Code, OpenCode, Cursor, etc.)","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"Signet is an open standard for portable AI agent identity with spec version 0.2.1-draft, auth built on ERC-8128 wallet-based signatures"},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"ce329a39-623c-4c2b-a4a1-c08ca2dad43a","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact describes the same core Signet mechanism more generally. Candidate [4] is OpenClaw-specific; new fact reveals it's a universal Signet behavior. Merging into broader principle: Signet daemon automatically injects relevant context into all agent conversations by assembling and delivering context based on conversation state.","fact":{"content":"Signet automatically injects relevant context into agent conversations","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"The Signet daemon is responsible for assembling and delivering context to agents in the OpenClaw/ClawdBot environment"},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [1] already explicitly documents the `/remember` and `/recall` slash commands as part of Signet's existing conventions. The new fact provides no additional information beyond what is already captured.","fact":{"content":"Signet provides explicit memory commands for saving and recalling information","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact is already covered by existing memory [1]. The candidate includes all four differentiation points (persistent memory, portable agent identity, automatic context injection, explicit memory commands) and provides additional context about when this was explained. No new information to capture.","fact":{"content":"Signet's core differentiation from competing solutions is its combination of persistent memory, portable agent identity, automatic context injection, and explicit memory management","type":"fact","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":2,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 3f595862-4557-4cb1-a684-4701b4834149
memory_id: 0ec0fbf8-ad7a-48e5-8e41-317c74b2855b
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:00:24.328Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:01:20.931Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T09:59:33.883Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:01:20.931Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Nicholai requested implementation of a PreToolUse hook to block git commits containing Claude Code's automatic 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' attribution","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook is intended to intercept git commit operations and prevent commits with Claude Code's automatic co-author attribution from being created","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Claude Code automatically adds 'Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku' attribution to git commits","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"A session was conducted to plan and begin implementing the PreToolUse hook for blocking Claude's automatic commit attribution","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"requested","target":"PreToolUse hook implementation","confidence":0.95},{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"blocks","target":"git commits with Co-Authored-By attribution","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Claude Code","relationship":"generates","target":"automatic Co-Authored-By attribution","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents this exact decision: Nicholai's request to implement a PreToolUse hook blocking commits with Claude Code's Co-Authored-By attribution. No new information to add or refine.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai requested implementation of a PreToolUse hook to block git commits containing Claude Code's automatic 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' attribution","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures this exact fact: the PreToolUse hook's purpose is to block git commits containing Claude Code's Co-Authored-By attribution. New fact is semantically identical, just slightly different wording.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook is intended to intercept git commit operations and prevent commits with Claude Code's automatic co-author attribution from being created","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate [4] already documents that Claude Code automatically appends Co-Authored-By attribution. The new fact restates this technical behavior without adding new information beyond what's already captured in existing memories.","fact":{"content":"Claude Code automatically adds 'Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku' attribution to git commits","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures the identical information: planning and beginning implementation of the PreToolUse hook to block Claude's automatic Co-Authored-By attribution. Candidate [5] documents the next steps. New fact adds no new procedural details or context.","fact":{"content":"A session was conducted to plan and begin implementing the PreToolUse hook for blocking Claude's automatic commit attribution","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 6d9eeb1a-30d1-4845-b5d9-492ccf4c3b75
memory_id: ccda4de4-ef08-4c94-855b-f488c993578a
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:01:22.932Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:02:11.515Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T09:59:33.901Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:02:11.515Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A bash script at ~/.claude/hooks/block-coauthor.sh intercepts Bash tool calls before they are executed","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh hook reads JSON input via stdin to analyze git commands","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh hook uses jq to extract git commands from the input JSON","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh hook scans for the case-insensitive regex pattern 'Co-Authored-By:.*Claude' to detect and block Claude co-author attributions","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"block-coauthor.sh hook","relationship":"intercepts","target":"Bash tool calls","confidence":0.95},{"source":"block-coauthor.sh hook","relationship":"reads input from","target":"stdin (JSON format)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"block-coauthor.sh hook","relationship":"uses tool","target":"jq","confidence":0.9},{"source":"block-coauthor.sh hook","relationship":"extracts","target":"git commands","confidence":0.9},{"source":"block-coauthor.sh hook","relationship":"scans for pattern","target":"Co-Authored-By:.*Claude (case-insensitive)","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [3] already documents this hook script at ~/.claude/hooks/block-coauthor.sh with the purpose of intercepting Bash tool calls before execution. The new fact is a summary statement already covered in detail by the existing memory.","fact":{"content":"A bash script at ~/.claude/hooks/block-coauthor.sh intercepts Bash tool calls before they are executed","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already contains this procedural detail: 'The hook reads JSON input via stdin, extracts the git command being run using `jq`'. The new fact is fully covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh hook reads JSON input via stdin to analyze git commands","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [3] already covers this implementation detail: 'The hook reads JSON input via stdin, extracts the git command being run using `jq`'. The new fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh hook uses jq to extract git commands from the input JSON","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents the exact same technical detail: the bash script scans for the case-insensitive pattern 'Co-Authored-By:.*Claude'. No new information to add.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh hook scans for the case-insensitive regex pattern 'Co-Authored-By:.*Claude' to detect and block Claude co-author attributions","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 58f5b48f-c3c4-46bd-91fd-0dc18b65b995
memory_id: 0a049648-ed7a-4e47-bb8b-d7bf6e3492ec
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:02:13.516Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:03:15.744Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T09:59:33.913Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:03:15.744Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The PreToolUse hook is registered in ~/.claude/settings.json configuration file","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook has a 5-second timeout for execution","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook is configured with a matcher targeting the Bash tool","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"When a condition is met, the PreToolUse hook outputs a JSON response with permissionDecision: 'deny' to block tool execution","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"When a condition is not met, the PreToolUse hook exits cleanly to allow the Bash tool to execute","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"registered in","target":"~/.claude/settings.json","confidence":0.95},{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"has timeout","target":"5 seconds","confidence":0.95},{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"targets","target":"Bash tool","confidence":0.95},{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"denies execution with","target":"permissionDecision: 'deny' JSON response","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [2] already contains this exact information with additional detail (5-second timeout, Bash tool matcher). New fact is a subset of existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook is registered in ~/.claude/settings.json configuration file","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents that the PreToolUse hook is registered with a 5-second timeout in ~/.claude/settings.json. The new fact is fully covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook has a 5-second timeout for execution","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already documents that 'The PreToolUse hook is registered in `~/.claude/settings.json` with a 5-second timeout and matcher targeting the Bash tool.' The new fact is fully covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook is configured with a matcher targeting the Bash tool","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already covered by candidate [4], which explicitly states the PreToolUse hook mechanism: 'If found, it outputs a JSON response with permissionDecision: \"deny\"; otherwise it exits cleanly to allow execution.' The new fact adds no novel information beyond what's already documented.","fact":{"content":"When a condition is met, the PreToolUse hook outputs a JSON response with permissionDecision: 'deny' to block tool execution","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"0a049648-ed7a-4e47-bb8b-d7bf6e3492ec","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact adds specific behavioral detail about PreToolUse hook cleanup path. Candidate [5] already documents PreToolUse hook registration and the deny path; this fact clarifies the complementary allow path (exits cleanly when condition not met). Should be merged into single, complete procedural note.","fact":{"content":"When a condition is not met, the PreToolUse hook exits cleanly to allow the Bash tool to execute","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"If found, it outputs a JSON response with `permissionDecision: \"deny\"`; otherwise it exits cleanly to allow execution. The PreToolUse hook is registered in `~/.claude/settings.json` with a 5-second timeout and matcher targeting the Bash tool."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 2c03af49-3818-4103-92b4-b6ef681c36cc
memory_id: 02df05e2-c885-4945-be22-65660daaaaca
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:03:17.746Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:04:07.268Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T09:59:33.967Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:04:07.268Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The settings.json file contains hook configurations that trigger on SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd events","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Hooks configured in settings.json execute signet commands when their respective events occur","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The hook structure in settings.json uses a defined format that allows adding new hook entries","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"settings.json","relationship":"contains","target":"SessionStart hook","confidence":0.95},{"source":"settings.json","relationship":"contains","target":"UserPromptSubmit hook","confidence":0.95},{"source":"settings.json","relationship":"contains","target":"SessionEnd hook","confidence":0.95},{"source":"hooks (in settings.json)","relationship":"execute","target":"signet commands","confidence":0.9},{"source":"settings.json","relationship":"supports","target":"extensible hook format","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This fact is already covered by existing candidate [4] (ID: 02df05e2-c885-4945-be22-65660daaaaca), which specifically documents that settings.json contains existing SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd hooks that call signet commands. The new fact is less detailed than what's already stored.","fact":{"content":"The settings.json file contains hook configurations that trigger on SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd events","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate [3] already captures this fact—it explicitly mentions that settings.json contains hooks that call signet commands. The new fact is a restatement of information already present in the existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Hooks configured in settings.json execute signet commands when their respective events occur","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"02df05e2-c885-4945-be22-65660daaaaca","confidence":0.8,"reason":"The new fact describes the general extensibility of the hook structure, which complements candidate 1's concrete listing of existing hooks. Merging them creates a more complete memory about settings.json hooks: both what exists AND that the format supports adding new entries.","fact":{"content":"The hook structure in settings.json uses a defined format that allows adding new hook entries","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"## Work Completed Read existing `settings.json` to understand the hook structure and confirm the format for adding new hook entries. The file contains existing SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd hooks that call signet commands."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: af38ad5e-a546-4818-bc94-949170bd6bd1
memory_id: 9e3daf6d-9a85-4901-b63f-9cb0171116c1
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:04:09.270Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:05:26.793Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T09:59:34.004Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:05:26.793Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A bash script must be created to implement the PreToolUse hook mechanism","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"settings.json must be updated to register the PreToolUse hook","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook should block git commits when attempted through Claude Code interface","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Manual git commits executed outside Claude Code should work normally without being blocked by the PreToolUse hook","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Testing the PreToolUse hook implementation requires two test cases: (1) attempting a git commit through Claude Code UI (should be blocked), (2) attempting a manual git commit from command line outside Claude (should succeed)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"blocks","target":"git commits in Claude Code","confidence":0.85},{"source":"settings.json","relationship":"registers","target":"PreToolUse hook","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Bash script","relationship":"implements","target":"PreToolUse hook","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Manual git commits outside Claude Code","relationship":"are not blocked by","target":"PreToolUse hook","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The new fact is already well-covered by existing candidates. Candidate [4] provides the detailed procedural specification for the bash script at ~/.claude/hooks/block-coauthor.sh, candidate [3] lists it as a next step, and candidate [5] indicates readiness to implement. The new fact adds no new information beyond what's already documented.","fact":{"content":"A bash script must be created to implement the PreToolUse hook mechanism","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [2] already explicitly covers this action: 'update settings.json to register the PreToolUse hook' as part of the next steps. The new fact is already captured in existing memory.","fact":{"content":"settings.json must be updated to register the PreToolUse hook","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"0ec0fbf8-ad7a-48e5-8e41-317c74b2855b","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact clarifies the blocking mechanism and timing. Candidate 3 describes the hook request and beginning of implementation, but the new fact adds important specification that commits should be blocked when attempted *through the Claude Code interface* (interface-level prevention, not post-creation filtering). Merging enhances clarity about the intended behavior.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook should block git commits when attempted through Claude Code interface","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"## Block Co-Authored-By Attribution Hook Implementation Nicholai requested implementation of a PreToolUse hook to block any git commits that contain Claude Code's automatic \"Co-Authored-By: Claude\" attribution. The session involved planning and beginning implementation of the blocking mechanism."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate [4] already documents this behavior explicitly: 'Test by attempting a commit through Claude Code (should be blocked) and a manual git commit outside Claude (should work normally).' The new fact is already covered as part of the hook testing strategy.","fact":{"content":"Manual git commits executed outside Claude Code should work normally without being blocked by the PreToolUse hook","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"9e3daf6d-9a85-4901-b63f-9cb0171116c1","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The new fact provides specific test case procedures that directly expand on the existing 'Next Steps' candidate. It details the exact two test scenarios (Claude Code UI attempt + command line attempt) with expected outcomes, refining the abstract testing guidance already present.","fact":{"content":"Testing the PreToolUse hook implementation requires two test cases: (1) attempting a git commit through Claude Code UI (should be blocked), (2) attempting a manual git commit from command line outside Claude (should succeed)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"## Next Steps Create the bash script and update settings.json to register the PreToolUse hook. Test by attempting a commit through Claude Code (should be blocked) and a manual git commit outside Claude (should work normally)."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":2,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 3e7884a2-b3ae-41da-a3b1-225a0d787766
memory_id: a69cd84b-18c4-4df9-98b8-be4cdf362e3e
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:05:28.825Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:06:17.177Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:04:02.416Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:06:17.177Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Nicholai requested implementation of a PreToolUse hook to block git commits containing Claude's automatic `Co-Authored-By:` attribution line","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Nicholai prefers git commits without Claude's automatic `Co-Authored-By:` attribution footer","type":"preference","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The intended blocking mechanism is a PreToolUse hook that intercepts git commit operations before they execute","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"requested implementation of","target":"PreToolUse hook for blocking Co-Authored-By attribution","confidence":0.95},{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"blocks","target":"git commits containing Co-Authored-By: Claude attribution","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"rejects","target":"Claude's automatic Co-Authored-By attribution in commits","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Claude","relationship":"generates","target":"Co-Authored-By: Claude attribution in git commits","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact decision: Nicholai requested implementation of a PreToolUse hook to block git commits containing Claude's automatic `Co-Authored-By:` attribution. New fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai requested implementation of a PreToolUse hook to block git commits containing Claude's automatic `Co-Authored-By:` attribution line","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [1] directly states the identical preference: 'Nicholai does not want Co-Authored-By attribution lines in git commits'. The new fact adds no new information and is already well-captured by existing memory. Candidates [3] and [4] further reinforce this as a firm rule, providing even stronger coverage.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai prefers git commits without Claude's automatic `Co-Authored-By:` attribution footer","type":"preference","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact is already comprehensively covered by existing memories: [1] documents the decision to use PreToolUse hook for blocking commits, [2] describes the technical implementation (bash script with jq pattern matching), and [5] specifies the detailed plan for registration and execution. The new fact is a high-level summary that adds no new information beyond what's already stored.","fact":{"content":"The intended blocking mechanism is a PreToolUse hook that intercepts git commit operations before they execute","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 9806ee6e-a87a-473c-b686-5a8ea0a38939
memory_id: a6b6029a-3ce8-4ce0-822f-c01bdc778ec3
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:06:19.178Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:07:58.729Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:04:02.427Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:07:58.729Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A bash script at ~/.claude/hooks/block-coauthor.sh is designed to prevent git commits with Claude Co-Authored-By attribution by intercepting PreToolUse events","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script reads PreToolUse JSON payload from stdin","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script extracts the git command from the JSON payload using jq","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script searches for the case-insensitive pattern `Co-Authored-By:.*Claude` within git commands","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script returns `permissionDecision: \"deny\"` when the Co-Authored-By Claude pattern is detected in a git command","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script allows git command execution by default when the Co-Authored-By Claude pattern is not found","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The block-coauthor hook must be registered in ~/.claude/settings.json with a 5-second timeout and status message field","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"block-coauthor.sh script","relationship":"located at","target":"~/.claude/hooks/block-coauthor.sh","confidence":0.95},{"source":"block-coauthor.sh script","relationship":"reads from","target":"stdin (PreToolUse JSON)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"block-coauthor.sh script","relationship":"parses with","target":"jq","confidence":0.95},{"source":"block-coauthor.sh script","relationship":"detects pattern","target":"Co-Authored-By:.*Claude (case-insensitive)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"block-coauthor hook","relationship":"registered in","target":"~/.claude/settings.json","confidence":0.9},{"source":"block-coauthor hook","relationship":"configured with timeout","target":"5 seconds","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already comprehensively covered by candidate [2], which describes the identical technical implementation: the bash script at ~/.claude/hooks/block-coauthor.sh that intercepts PreToolUse events, reads JSON via stdin, extracts git commands with jq, and blocks Co-Authored-By patterns. The existing candidate provides even more implementation detail.","fact":{"content":"A bash script at ~/.claude/hooks/block-coauthor.sh is designed to prevent git commits with Claude Co-Authored-By attribution by intercepting PreToolUse events","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"This fact is already covered by existing candidates [4] and [5], which both explicitly document that the block-coauthor.sh script reads JSON input from stdin (specifically PreToolUse JSON payload)","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script reads PreToolUse JSON payload from stdin","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The new fact that block-coauthor.sh uses jq to extract the git command is already comprehensively covered in candidate [2], which describes the technical approach including 'extracts the git command being run using jq'. Candidate [3] also mentions this detail in the rule specification. No new information to capture.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script extracts the git command from the JSON payload using jq","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This procedural detail is already documented in candidate 4 (ID: ccda4de4) which explicitly states the script 'scans for the case-insensitive pattern `Co-Authored-By:.*Claude`' and candidate 5 which describes the same search pattern. No new information is added.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script searches for the case-insensitive pattern `Co-Authored-By:.*Claude` within git commands","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already comprehensively covered by candidate [5] (rule), which explicitly specifies that the script 'Returns `permissionDecision: \"deny\"` if found, otherwise allows execution'. The new fact restates the same behavior without adding new information.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script returns `permissionDecision: \"deny\"` when the Co-Authored-By Claude pattern is detected in a git command","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 already explicitly states the implementation behavior: 'Returns permissionDecision: \"deny\" if found, otherwise allows execution' - the new fact is a rephrasing of the same procedural detail that execution is allowed by default when the pattern is not found.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script allows git command execution by default when the Co-Authored-By Claude pattern is not found","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already contains this exact procedural requirement: 'The hook must be registered in `~/.claude/settings.json` with a 5-second timeout and status message.' The new fact is fully covered by existing rule memory.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor hook must be registered in ~/.claude/settings.json with a 5-second timeout and status message field","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 7ae5f1be-6a45-4908-a6d5-5f08347912e6
memory_id: 02e19812-eb76-4a42-b837-8912cedffc4b
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:08:00.731Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:08:39.160Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:04:02.438Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:08:39.160Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"settings.json file contains hook architecture that uses event-based triggers","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Hook system supports three event trigger types: SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Implementation plan involves creating a hook script and updating settings.json configuration","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"settings.json","relationship":"contains","target":"hook architecture","confidence":0.9},{"source":"hooks","relationship":"use","target":"event-based triggers","confidence":0.9},{"source":"hooks","relationship":"triggered_by","target":"SessionStart","confidence":0.95},{"source":"hooks","relationship":"triggered_by","target":"UserPromptSubmit","confidence":0.95},{"source":"hooks","relationship":"triggered_by","target":"SessionEnd","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this fact in greater detail, explicitly confirming that hook format uses event-based triggers (SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, SessionEnd). The new fact adds no additional information beyond what's already documented.","fact":{"content":"settings.json file contains hook architecture that uses event-based triggers","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.95,"reason":"No existing memories match this fact","fact":{"content":"Hook system supports three event trigger types: SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate [5] already explicitly states 'Next steps: Create the hook script and update settings.json configuration.' This new fact is the same information at a higher level of abstraction and is already captured in the existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Implementation plan involves creating a hook script and updating settings.json configuration","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":1,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":1},"warnings":[]}


id: 03ff3031-07d4-4441-ae0a-52c0d2690a38
memory_id: 26b1f649-f0b2-4157-bc4b-0df21d08530c
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:08:41.163Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:09:30.925Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:08:33.620Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:09:30.925Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Claude Code automatically adds 'Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>' attribution to git commits","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"A PreToolUse hook is being implemented to block git commits that contain Claude Code's automatic attribution","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The implementation plan for the PreToolUse hook involves two tasks (details incomplete in source text)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.7}],"entities":[{"source":"Claude Code","relationship":"automatically adds","target":"Co-Authored-By attribution","confidence":0.95},{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"blocks","target":"git commits with Claude Code attribution","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Existing memories (3, 4, 5) already document Claude Code's automatic Co-Authored-By attribution behavior and Nicholai's response to it (preferences/rules in 1, 2, and implementation attempts in 4, 5). This new fact restates what's already covered.","fact":{"content":"Claude Code automatically adds 'Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>' attribution to git commits","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"The new fact about the PreToolUse hook implementation being in progress is already well-covered by existing candidates [4] and [5], which document both the request and initiation of the implementation. No new information is added that would warrant updating or creating a new memory.","fact":{"content":"A PreToolUse hook is being implemented to block git commits that contain Claude Code's automatic attribution","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"The new fact is vague and incomplete ('details incomplete in source text'). Candidate 1 already captures the full implementation plan with 5 specific code locations and detailed changes. Candidate 5 captures the two specific test cases for PreToolUse. No new information is added by this incomplete reference.","fact":{"content":"The implementation plan for the PreToolUse hook involves two tasks (details incomplete in source text)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.7}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: eb24b633-04b5-4d90-9710-6b869f36f483
memory_id: 93b43cf7-67a4-4528-bde7-ab2459c58975
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:09:32.926Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:10:55.712Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:08:33.630Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:10:55.712Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A bash hook script exists at ~/.claude/hooks/block-coauthor.sh that enforces a rule preventing git commits containing the Co-Authored-By pattern","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script reads JSON data from stdin as its input source","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script uses jq to parse and extract the git command from JSON input","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script performs case-insensitive scanning for the Co-Authored-By pattern in the extracted command","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script denies (blocks) execution when a git commit operation contains the Co-Authored-By pattern","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script allows execution for all other operations and git commits that do not contain the Co-Authored-By pattern","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"block-coauthor.sh","relationship":"reads from","target":"stdin","confidence":0.95},{"source":"block-coauthor.sh","relationship":"uses","target":"jq","confidence":0.95},{"source":"block-coauthor.sh","relationship":"scans for","target":"Co-Authored-By pattern","confidence":0.95},{"source":"block-coauthor.sh","relationship":"blocks","target":"git commit with Co-Authored-By","confidence":0.95},{"source":"block-coauthor.sh","relationship":"allows","target":"git operations without Co-Authored-By","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [2] already comprehensively documents this script: location, functionality, implementation details (stdin, jq extraction, case-insensitive pattern matching). New fact is a condensed restatement of already-captured procedural knowledge.","fact":{"content":"A bash hook script exists at ~/.claude/hooks/block-coauthor.sh that enforces a rule preventing git commits containing the Co-Authored-By pattern","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already captured in existing memories. Candidates [2], [3], and [4] all explicitly mention that block-coauthor.sh reads JSON input via stdin as part of the hook mechanism.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script reads JSON data from stdin as its input source","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [2] already explicitly states that the block-coauthor.sh script 'extracts the git command being run using `jq`'. The new fact is a specific detail that is already adequately covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script uses jq to parse and extract the git command from JSON input","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 3 already comprehensively covers this fact, explicitly stating the script 'scans for the case-insensitive pattern `Co-Authored-By:.*Claude`'. Candidate 5 also mentions case-insensitive scanning. The new fact is a reiteration of existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script performs case-insensitive scanning for the Co-Authored-By pattern in the extracted command","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"The new fact describing the script's blocking behavior is already well-covered by candidate [5], which explicitly states the script 'Denies execution if found, allows otherwise.' Candidate [3] also specifies the deny/allow behavior as part of the implementation plan. No new information is being added.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script denies (blocks) execution when a git commit operation contains the Co-Authored-By pattern","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidates 3 and 5 already explicitly state the hook 'allows execution' when the Co-Authored-By pattern is not found. New fact is a restatement of existing coverage.","fact":{"content":"The block-coauthor.sh script allows execution for all other operations and git commits that do not contain the Co-Authored-By pattern","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: a7ad77df-1ad1-48f0-a10b-5c211f159b22
memory_id: d9a08ed5-99a8-4346-8d6e-058c642b5cf1
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:10:57.714Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:11:47.962Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:08:33.641Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:11:47.962Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A PreToolUse hook entry can be added to ~/.claude/settings.json hooks object to configure tool execution behavior","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The Bash tool PreToolUse hook in ~/.claude/settings.json can be configured with a matcher property set to 'Bash', a 5-second timeout, and a status message","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"PreToolUse hooks execute before a tool runs and can display status messages and enforce timeout limits","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"PreToolUse hook entry","relationship":"is configured in","target":"~/.claude/settings.json hooks object","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Bash hook configuration","relationship":"has matcher","target":"Bash","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Bash hook configuration","relationship":"has timeout","target":"5 seconds","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Bash hook configuration","relationship":"includes","target":"status message","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate [3] already captures the core fact about adding PreToolUse hook entries to settings.json, with additional implementation details (matcher 'Bash', 5-second timeout, status message). The new fact is a general restatement that is already covered by this existing memory.","fact":{"content":"A PreToolUse hook entry can be added to ~/.claude/settings.json hooks object to configure tool execution behavior","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [3] (ID: d9a08ed5-99a8-4346-8d6e-058c642b5cf1) already explicitly captures this exact configuration: PreToolUse entry with matcher 'Bash', 5-second timeout, and status message. The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The Bash tool PreToolUse hook in ~/.claude/settings.json can be configured with a matcher property set to 'Bash', a 5-second timeout, and a status message","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"0a049648-ed7a-4e47-bb8b-d7bf6e3492ec","confidence":0.88,"reason":"New fact describes general PreToolUse hook capabilities (timing, status messages, timeouts) while existing memory describes a specific behavior (condition checking and clean exit). Merging creates comprehensive understanding of PreToolUse hook mechanics.","fact":{"content":"PreToolUse hooks execute before a tool runs and can display status messages and enforce timeout limits","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"When a condition is not met, the PreToolUse hook exits cleanly to allow the Bash tool to execute"}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 3effce17-8db9-43ab-8690-ca7d88c52e15
memory_id: 80469ebc-2faf-46f4-8899-82918c74c508
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:11:49.963Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:12:49.765Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:08:33.651Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:12:49.765Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The settings.json file already has hooks configured for SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd events","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The existing hooks in settings.json (SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, SessionEnd) use signet commands for their implementations","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook will be configured to follow the same pattern structure as the existing hooks in settings.json","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Consistent hook pattern in settings.json means PreToolUse hook can be implemented using the signet command pattern already established by SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd hooks","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"settings.json","relationship":"contains","target":"SessionStart hook","confidence":0.95},{"source":"settings.json","relationship":"contains","target":"UserPromptSubmit hook","confidence":0.95},{"source":"settings.json","relationship":"contains","target":"SessionEnd hook","confidence":0.95},{"source":"SessionStart hook","relationship":"uses","target":"signet commands","confidence":0.9},{"source":"UserPromptSubmit hook","relationship":"uses","target":"signet commands","confidence":0.9},{"source":"SessionEnd hook","relationship":"uses","target":"signet commands","confidence":0.9},{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"follows pattern of","target":"existing hooks in settings.json","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures this exact fact: 'Examined existing settings.json structure which already has hooks configured for SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd via signet commands.' The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The settings.json file already has hooks configured for SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd events","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] (80469ebc-2faf-46f4-8899-82918c74c508) already explicitly states that SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd are configured 'via signet commands' - this is a direct match to the new fact and is already captured in memory.","fact":{"content":"The existing hooks in settings.json (SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, SessionEnd) use signet commands for their implementations","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate [4] (80469ebc...) already explicitly states 'The PreToolUse hook will follow the same pattern structure.' This new fact is redundant with existing memory and doesn't add new information.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook will be configured to follow the same pattern structure as the existing hooks in settings.json","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"80469ebc-2faf-46f4-8899-82918c74c508","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact provides architectural rationale for what [4] observes. Merging adds explicit insight that PreToolUse follows a consistent signet command pattern already proven by SessionStart/UserPromptSubmit/SessionEnd, making the memory more actionable.","fact":{"content":"Consistent hook pattern in settings.json means PreToolUse hook can be implemented using the signet command pattern already established by SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd hooks","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"Examined existing settings.json structure which already has hooks configured for SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd via signet commands. The PreToolUse hook will follow the same pattern structure."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 0dd51d03-0fc3-4b1b-922e-a2e05b60a31a
memory_id: fbc62127-b750-4fa1-8729-634ca30b8a66
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:12:51.768Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:13:40.666Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:08:33.661Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:13:40.666Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Hook script implementation is pending and needs to be completed","type":"procedural","confidence":0.7},{"content":"Settings update is pending and needs to be completed","type":"procedural","confidence":0.7},{"content":"settings.json was read during a session","type":"fact","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"hook script","relationship":"requires","target":"implementation","confidence":0.7},{"source":"settings","relationship":"requires","target":"update","confidence":0.7},{"source":"session","relationship":"read","target":"settings.json","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"add","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact is about hook script implementation being pending and requiring completion. Existing candidate discusses documentation of flush handling in Claude Code. While both mention 'implementation pending,' they address different features and should be tracked separately.","fact":{"content":"Hook script implementation is pending and needs to be completed","type":"procedural","confidence":0.7}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.65,"reason":"New fact describes a pending settings update action. No existing candidate specifically addresses pending settings-related work. While candidate [2] mentions implementation phases and [4] relates to update system functions, neither captures this specific pending settings task.","fact":{"content":"Settings update is pending and needs to be completed","type":"procedural","confidence":0.7}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 already captures this fact ('Session ended after reading settings.json') with additional context about pending implementation. New fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"settings.json was read during a session","type":"fact","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":2,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":2},"warnings":[]}


id: 7db9f330-0401-42fa-a649-fcd387050d4c
memory_id: f8d14a1e-3f8c-4d49-b53e-8ad28d3b4295
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:33:31.940Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:34:46.531Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:33:30.824Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:34:46.531Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The Signet documentation block in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` contains a broken or outdated CLI reference to secret management that should be removed","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The `secret_list` MCP tool is used in Signet to discover available secret names stored in the secret store","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The `secret_exec` MCP tool is used in Signet to execute shell commands with secrets injected as environment variables, with output automatically redacted","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The documentation in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` should replace the broken CLI reference with instructions for using `secret_list` and `secret_exec` MCP tools for secret discovery and command execution","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"Signet documentation block in packages/core/src/markdown.ts","relationship":"contains broken reference to","target":"CLI secret command","confidence":0.85},{"source":"Signet secret workflow","relationship":"uses","target":"secret_list MCP tool","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Signet secret workflow","relationship":"uses","target":"secret_exec MCP tool","confidence":0.9},{"source":"secret_list MCP tool","relationship":"discovers","target":"available secret names","confidence":0.9},{"source":"secret_exec MCP tool","relationship":"executes","target":"commands with secrets as environment variables","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"f8d14a1e-3f8c-4d49-b53e-8ad28d3b4295","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New decision (0.85) directly confirms existing issue [5]. Both identify the same problem: outdated CLI references in markdown.ts that need removal and replacement with MCP tool documentation. Merge to strengthen existing issue with higher confidence.","fact":{"content":"The Signet documentation block in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` contains a broken or outdated CLI reference to secret management that should be removed","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"**Documentation Fix**: Update the Signet block in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` to remove the broken CLI reference and document the actual workflow: `secret_list` and `secret_exec` MCP tools for discovery and usage. 2."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [2] (ID: 0336fa74-aecf-4f0c-a46b-cd3e4de00f97) already covers this fact: 'The secret_list MCP tool in Signet enables users to discover what secrets are available in the system'. The new fact is a restatement of the same concept with no additional detail or context to justify a separate memory entry.","fact":{"content":"The `secret_list` MCP tool is used in Signet to discover available secret names stored in the secret store","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"ff3a8b11-23cd-45a0-abca-39bf11ebbf9a","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact adds important detail about output redaction to existing secret_exec memory. Merging enriches the procedural knowledge with security-relevant behavior.","fact":{"content":"The `secret_exec` MCP tool is used in Signet to execute shell commands with secrets injected as environment variables, with output automatically redacted","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"The secret_exec MCP tool runs shell commands with secrets injected as environment variables"},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate #4 (f8d14a1e-3f8c-4d49-b53e-8ad28d3b4295) already captures this decision with identical specificity: 'Update the Signet block in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` to remove the broken CLI reference and document the actual workflow: `secret_list` and `secret_exec` MCP tools'. New fact adds no additional detail or nuance.","fact":{"content":"The documentation in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` should replace the broken CLI reference with instructions for using `secret_list` and `secret_exec` MCP tools for secret discovery and command execution","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":2,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 1372f7d2-4d92-429b-97fa-ccdca6c8d677
memory_id: 86c2499b-d0f5-480f-a806-6f6b57268c65
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:34:48.586Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:35:56.782Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:33:30.835Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:35:56.782Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Two new MCP tools (secret_list and secret_exec) must be added to packages/daemon/src/mcp/tools.ts","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The secret_list MCP tool queries the GET /api/secrets endpoint to return a list of available secret names","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The secret_exec MCP tool executes shell commands with secrets injected as environment variables","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The secret_exec MCP tool accepts two parameters: a command string and a mapping of environment variable names to secret names","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"secret_list tool","relationship":"queries","target":"GET /api/secrets endpoint","confidence":0.95},{"source":"secret_exec tool","relationship":"injects","target":"environment variables","confidence":0.95},{"source":"secret_exec tool","relationship":"executes","target":"shell commands","confidence":0.95},{"source":"packages/daemon/src/mcp/tools.ts","relationship":"implements","target":"secret_list tool","confidence":0.95},{"source":"packages/daemon/src/mcp/tools.ts","relationship":"implements","target":"secret_exec tool","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact procedural requirement: adding secret_list and secret_exec tools to packages/daemon/src/mcp/tools.ts with specific implementation details. New fact is redundant.","fact":{"content":"Two new MCP tools (secret_list and secret_exec) must be added to packages/daemon/src/mcp/tools.ts","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already explicitly documents that secret_list 'queries GET /api/secrets to return available secret names' — the new fact is a restatement of existing memory","fact":{"content":"The secret_list MCP tool queries the GET /api/secrets endpoint to return a list of available secret names","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [4] (ID: ff3a8b11...) already contains this exact procedural fact, with additional detail (output automatically redacted). New fact is redundant.","fact":{"content":"The secret_exec MCP tool executes shell commands with secrets injected as environment variables","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents that secret_exec 'takes command string and env var → secret name mapping', which is precisely the same information as the new fact about accepting two parameters (command string and env var→secret name mapping)","fact":{"content":"The secret_exec MCP tool accepts two parameters: a command string and a mapping of environment variable names to secret names","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: b894018c-3e10-4a6c-9813-bffc414a82dd
memory_id: 3ac9af12-3053-4d1b-81d4-00f9a31f57c3
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:35:58.784Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:36:54.689Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:33:31.022Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:36:54.689Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"settings.json already has hooks configured for SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd that invoke signet commands","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook will be implemented to follow the same pattern structure as the existing SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd hooks in settings.json","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"settings.json","relationship":"contains","target":"SessionStart hook","confidence":0.95},{"source":"settings.json","relationship":"contains","target":"UserPromptSubmit hook","confidence":0.95},{"source":"settings.json","relationship":"contains","target":"SessionEnd hook","confidence":0.95},{"source":"SessionStart hook","relationship":"executes_via","target":"signet commands","confidence":0.95},{"source":"UserPromptSubmit hook","relationship":"executes_via","target":"signet commands","confidence":0.95},{"source":"SessionEnd hook","relationship":"executes_via","target":"signet commands","confidence":0.95},{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"follows_pattern_of","target":"existing settings.json hooks","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Existing candidate [5] already documents this exact fact: 'already has hooks configured for SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd via signet commands'. Candidate [2] also confirms these hooks exist. Information is well-covered.","fact":{"content":"settings.json already has hooks configured for SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd that invoke signet commands","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already captured in candidate 5 (3ac9af12-3053-4d1b-81d4-00f9a31f57c3), which explicitly states 'The PreToolUse hook will follow the same pattern structure' established by existing hooks. No new information to add.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook will be implemented to follow the same pattern structure as the existing SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, and SessionEnd hooks in settings.json","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 447a81b1-f981-432d-b1d8-6689f8dba3b0
memory_id: 15163762-7ee7-452e-8205-71bdf189c747
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:36:56.690Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:38:19.017Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:33:31.054Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:38:19.017Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The PreToolUse hook outputs a JSON response with `permissionDecision: \"deny\"` when a condition is detected","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook exits cleanly to allow execution when the condition is not detected","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook is registered in ~/.claude/settings.json","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook has a 5-second timeout configured","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook includes a matcher that targets the Bash tool","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"registered in","target":"~/.claude/settings.json","confidence":0.95},{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"targets","target":"Bash tool","confidence":0.95},{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"has timeout","target":"5 seconds","confidence":0.95},{"source":"PreToolUse hook","relationship":"outputs","target":"JSON response with permissionDecision deny","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 (15163762-7ee7-452e-8205-71bdf189c747) already explicitly documents that the PreToolUse hook outputs a JSON response with `permissionDecision: \"deny\"` when a condition is found. The new fact is already captured.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook outputs a JSON response with `permissionDecision: \"deny\"` when a condition is detected","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this behavior: 'otherwise it exits cleanly to allow execution' describes exactly what happens when the condition is not detected. The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook exits cleanly to allow execution when the condition is not detected","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"d9a08ed5-99a8-4346-8d6e-058c642b5cf1","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact confirms the PreToolUse hook registration described in candidate [3]. The existing memory was about adding/implementing it; the new fact confirms completion. Merge to reflect confirmed registration status with existing configuration details.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook is registered in ~/.claude/settings.json","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"**Settings Registration** - Adding a PreToolUse entry to `~/.claude/settings.json` hooks object with matcher \"Bash\", 5-second timeout, and status message."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already captured by existing candidates [4] and [5], which both specifically mention the 5-second timeout configured for the PreToolUse hook in ~/.claude/settings.json","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook has a 5-second timeout configured","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Fact already covered by existing candidate [5], which explicitly states 'The PreToolUse hook is registered in ~/.claude/settings.json with a 5-second timeout and matcher targeting the Bash tool.' Candidate [2] also covers the matcher targeting Bash as part of the settings.json configuration.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook includes a matcher that targets the Bash tool","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 633cc92f-d3ad-4fa4-993e-80b184b997b9
memory_id: 12fd8ec4-3a72-4c82-9d53-cbec2bce0d6e
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:38:21.018Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:39:38.011Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:38:11.480Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:39:38.011Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Signet introduction post was published to OpenClaw GitHub Discussions #28597 in the \"Show and tell\" category","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The Signet introduction post framing emphasizes memory auto-injection and agent-blind secrets as core features","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The Signet introduction post was designed to reference and address existing OpenClaw community pain points","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Signet positioning leverages community pain points (memory injection, secret management) to demonstrate relevance and value to OpenClaw users","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"Signet","relationship":"posted_to","target":"OpenClaw GitHub Discussions #28597","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet introduction post","relationship":"highlights","target":"memory auto-injection","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Signet introduction post","relationship":"highlights","target":"agent-blind secrets","confidence":0.9},{"source":"OpenClaw GitHub Discussions #28597","relationship":"category","target":"Show and tell","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","targetMemoryId":"12fd8ec4-3a72-4c82-9d53-cbec2bce0d6e","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents this exact fact: Signet introduction posted to GitHub Discussions #28597 in 'Show and tell' category, with full URL and context. New fact is redundant.","fact":{"content":"Signet introduction post was published to OpenClaw GitHub Discussions #28597 in the \"Show and tell\" category","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"Posted Signet introduction to OpenClaw GitHub Discussions #28597 (Show and tell category). Framed around memory auto-injection and agent-blind secrets, referencing existing community pain points. URL: https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/discussions/28597"},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [1] already captures this exact information: the Signet introduction post was framed around memory auto-injection and agent-blind secrets. No new information to add.","fact":{"content":"The Signet introduction post framing emphasizes memory auto-injection and agent-blind secrets as core features","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this fact: it explicitly states the post was 'framed around...referencing existing community pain points.' The new fact adds rationale/emphasis but no new information beyond what's already stored.","fact":{"content":"The Signet introduction post was designed to reference and address existing OpenClaw community pain points","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"12fd8ec4-3a72-4c82-9d53-cbec2bce0d6e","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact is the strategic rationale behind the existing GitHub Discussions post. Candidate [5] describes the action (posting with specific framing), while the new fact explains why—leveraging community pain points for positioning. Merge into one complete memory capturing both the tactic and the underlying strategy.","fact":{"content":"Signet positioning leverages community pain points (memory injection, secret management) to demonstrate relevance and value to OpenClaw users","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"Posted Signet introduction to OpenClaw GitHub Discussions #28597 (Show and tell category). Framed around memory auto-injection and agent-blind secrets, referencing existing community pain points. URL: https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/discussions/28597"}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: cae38ffa-688f-41f1-9508-9235b7f699a3
memory_id: b7479667-c36f-4551-964e-20401fd63ea0
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:52:20.495Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:53:32.465Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:52:19.391Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:53:32.465Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The Signet documentation block in packages/core/src/markdown.ts contains a broken CLI reference that needs to be removed","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The correct secret management workflow uses secret_list MCP tool for discovering available secret names and secret_exec MCP tool for executing commands with secrets injected as environment variables","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The Signet documentation block in packages/core/src/markdown.ts should be updated to document the actual MCP tool-based secret workflow instead of the broken CLI reference","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"packages/core/src/markdown.ts","relationship":"contains","target":"Signet documentation block","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet documentation block","relationship":"documents_broken_reference_to","target":"CLI-based secret commands","confidence":0.9},{"source":"secret_list MCP tool","relationship":"used_for","target":"discovering available secrets","confidence":0.95},{"source":"secret_exec MCP tool","relationship":"used_for","target":"executing commands with injected secrets","confidence":0.95},{"source":"packages/core/src/markdown.ts","relationship":"requires_update_to_document","target":"MCP tool-based secret workflow","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"The new fact is already captured by existing memories [4] and [5]. Candidate [4] is a decision about removing the broken CLI reference, and candidate [5] is an issue describing the same fix with additional context about what should replace it (secret_list and secret_exec MCP tools). The new fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The Signet documentation block in packages/core/src/markdown.ts contains a broken CLI reference that needs to be removed","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact provides complete procedural workflow combining both secret_list and secret_exec tools. Existing candidates are fragmented (partial tools [1][4], meta/decision-level [3], or implementation-focused [5]). Storing as cohesive procedural knowledge improves recall and usability.","fact":{"content":"The correct secret management workflow uses secret_list MCP tool for discovering available secret names and secret_exec MCP tool for executing commands with secrets injected as environment variables","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"b7479667-c36f-4551-964e-20401fd63ea0","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact refines and reinforces existing decision [5] about the markdown.ts documentation block. Both identify the need to replace the broken CLI reference with proper MCP tool (secret_list/secret_exec) workflow documentation. New fact emphasizes the replacement action ('update to document the actual MCP tool-based workflow instead of') which is more precise than just removal. Merge by emphasizing the workflow replacement focus.","fact":{"content":"The Signet documentation block in packages/core/src/markdown.ts should be updated to document the actual MCP tool-based secret workflow instead of the broken CLI reference","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"**Documentation Fix**: Update the Signet block in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` to remove the broken CLI reference and document the actual workflow: `secret_list` and `secret_exec` MCP tools for discovery and usage. 2."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":1,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":1},"warnings":[]}


id: 79c5b3a0-157b-43ca-abfa-615f3e4576dc
memory_id: 41ff55eb-4de9-4560-95e6-f0c1a3872473
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:53:34.467Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T10:54:43.978Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:52:19.591Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T10:54:43.978Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Settings Registration is implemented by adding a PreToolUse entry to the hooks object in ~/.claude/settings.json","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook entry in ~/.claude/settings.json has a matcher field configured for the Bash tool","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook entry in ~/.claude/settings.json specifies a 5-second timeout","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The PreToolUse hook entry in ~/.claude/settings.json includes a status message field","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"PreToolUse entry","relationship":"configured_in","target":"~/.claude/settings.json hooks object","confidence":0.9},{"source":"PreToolUse entry","relationship":"matches","target":"Bash tool","confidence":0.9},{"source":"PreToolUse entry","relationship":"has_timeout_of","target":"5 seconds","confidence":0.9},{"source":"PreToolUse entry","relationship":"includes","target":"status message","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents this exact fact with greater specificity, including the matcher pattern, timeout value, and status message details. The new fact is subsumed by the existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Settings Registration is implemented by adding a PreToolUse entry to the hooks object in ~/.claude/settings.json","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already covered by existing candidates [4] and [5], which both explicitly state the PreToolUse hook has a matcher targeting the Bash tool with 5-second timeout","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook entry in ~/.claude/settings.json has a matcher field configured for the Bash tool","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The 5-second timeout for PreToolUse hook is already documented in candidates [4] and [5]. Candidate [4] explicitly states 'The PreToolUse hook is registered in `~/.claude/settings.json` with a 5-second timeout' and candidate [5] mentions 'hooks object with matcher \"Bash\", 5-second timeout'. No new information to add.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook entry in ~/.claude/settings.json specifies a 5-second timeout","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this detail: PreToolUse hook entry includes matcher 'Bash', 5-second timeout, and status message field. New fact is redundant.","fact":{"content":"The PreToolUse hook entry in ~/.claude/settings.json includes a status message field","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 45b1ce06-bad0-4e3b-8445-224712ab314b
memory_id: 4124bd7d-5ff4-4d02-a220-cebc7ed2f7b9
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T10:59:16.339Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:00:13.077Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:59:16.248Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:00:13.077Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A session was initiated using the openclaw-bugfix-pr skill to find and fix a bug in the openclaw repository","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The working context for openclaw bugfix PR work is a reference copy of the openclaw repository located at `/home/nicholai/signet/signetai/references/openclaw`","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The openclaw-bugfix-pr skill is designed to find, fix, validate, and ship focused bug-fix pull requests for the openclaw/openclaw repository","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"Session","relationship":"initiated with","target":"openclaw-bugfix-pr skill","confidence":0.9},{"source":"openclaw-bugfix-pr skill","relationship":"targets","target":"openclaw repository","confidence":0.9},{"source":"openclaw bugfix workflow","relationship":"uses reference copy at","target":"/home/nicholai/signet/signetai/references/openclaw","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures this exact session initiation: 'Session initiated the openclaw-bugfix-pr skill to find and fix a bug in the openclaw repository.' No new or refined information in the new fact.","fact":{"content":"A session was initiated using the openclaw-bugfix-pr skill to find and fix a bug in the openclaw repository","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures this exact information: 'The working context was a reference copy at `/home/nicholai/signet/signetai/references/openclaw`.' The new fact is redundant and already well-documented in existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The working context for openclaw bugfix PR work is a reference copy of the openclaw repository located at `/home/nicholai/signet/signetai/references/openclaw`","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact describes the skill's general purpose/design, while existing candidates document specific session instances using the skill. This meta-knowledge about what the skill does is distinct and useful as standalone reference material.","fact":{"content":"The openclaw-bugfix-pr skill is designed to find, fix, validate, and ship focused bug-fix pull requests for the openclaw/openclaw repository","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":1,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":1},"warnings":[]}


id: 594dc5dc-d4fd-4308-b290-6c1025edb932
memory_id: 80bce2ea-c4af-4093-a0ca-1c438020b397
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:00:15.078Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:01:27.584Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T10:59:16.260Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:01:27.584Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The openclaw repository on the local machine is on the main branch, with git status showing ahead 1 commit and behind 1 commit from origin/main","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The openclaw repository has two remotes configured: origin pointing to openclaw/openclaw and a fork pointing to NicholaiVogel/clawdbot","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The assistant was searching for open bug issues in the openclaw/openclaw repository with the goal of reproducing and fixing them","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The work session was truncated before any specific bugs could be identified or reproduced","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"openclaw repository","relationship":"current branch","target":"main","confidence":0.95},{"source":"openclaw repository","relationship":"has remote","target":"openclaw/openclaw (origin)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"openclaw repository","relationship":"has remote","target":"NicholaiVogel/clawdbot (fork)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"openclaw repository","relationship":"sync status with origin/main","target":"ahead 1, behind 1","confidence":0.95},{"source":"assistant","relationship":"was searching for","target":"open bug issues","confidence":0.9},{"source":"work session","relationship":"interrupted before","target":"bug identification and reproduction","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already covered by candidate 80bce2ea. Candidate #5 explicitly states the repository is 'on main branch, ahead 1 and behind 1 from origin/main' as part of the initial setup confirmation. The new fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The openclaw repository on the local machine is on the main branch, with git status showing ahead 1 commit and behind 1 commit from origin/main","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [4] already documents the exact same configuration: 'Both origin (openclaw/openclaw) and fork (NicholaiVogel/clawdbot) remotes configured'. New fact is already captured in existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The openclaw repository has two remotes configured: origin pointing to openclaw/openclaw and a fork pointing to NicholaiVogel/clawdbot","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already documents this exact activity: 'Assistant began searching for open bug issues to reproduce and fix' in the openclaw/openclaw repository. The new fact restates the same action without adding new information or context.","fact":{"content":"The assistant was searching for open bug issues in the openclaw/openclaw repository with the goal of reproducing and fixing them","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Existing candidate [3] (ID: 707d00b0-b7ab-4f2f-9fac-db604e1e53b3) already captures this fact: 'No specific bugs were identified or fixed during this short session window—exploration was just beginning when the conversation ended.' Candidate [5] also includes this in its summary. The new fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The work session was truncated before any specific bugs could be identified or reproduced","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 78cc399d-9c96-47bf-bdce-5523c9bb396c
memory_id: 34ec12f7-6687-4e18-8be6-e9762a87dfab
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:02:41.596Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:03:40.417Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:02:40.548Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:03:40.417Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Session initialization in the Claude Code harness uses the `signet hook session-start` command to initialize the hook system","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The Claude Code harness supports successful hook system initialization during session startup on the signetai project","type":"fact","confidence":0.8}],"entities":[{"source":"`signet hook session-start` command","relationship":"initializes","target":"hook system","confidence":0.85},{"source":"Claude Code harness","relationship":"supports_initialization","target":"hook system","confidence":0.85},{"source":"signetai project","relationship":"uses","target":"hook system initialization","confidence":0.8}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate [5] (ID: 34ec12f7-6687-4e18-8be6-e9762a87dfab) already contains this exact procedural information: 'Hook system initialized successfully via `signet hook session-start` command with Claude Code harness.' The new fact adds no new knowledge beyond what's already captured.","fact":{"content":"Session initialization in the Claude Code harness uses the `signet hook session-start` command to initialize the hook system","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Existing memories already document multiple successful hook system initializations in Claude Code harness on signetai project. Candidate [5] explicitly states 'Hook system initialized successfully via `signet hook session-start` command with Claude Code harness.' The new fact is a generalization already well-supported by evidence in candidates [1], [2], [4], and [5].","fact":{"content":"The Claude Code harness supports successful hook system initialization during session startup on the signetai project","type":"fact","confidence":0.8}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: e019b14c-452b-4d6e-853c-6f0032d75fc1
memory_id: cc7a8374-2e79-4360-9be8-3ec132dbbe3e
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:17:50.821Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:18:43.087Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:17:49.074Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:18:43.087Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The Signet CLI setup wizard was originally configured to offer 7 different harness/connector options to users","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The Signet CLI setup wizard was restricted to only supported connectors, reducing the available platform options from 7 to 3","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The setup wizard restriction to supported connectors was implemented per Nicholai's request to limit available harness options","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"Signet CLI setup wizard","relationship":"was restricted to","target":"supported connectors only","confidence":0.9},{"source":"setup wizard connector options","relationship":"reduced from","target":"7 harnesses to 3 supported platforms","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"requested","target":"setup wizard restriction to supported connectors","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 2 (cc7a8374...) already explicitly states 'The wizard previously offered 7 harness/connector options' as part of the setup wizard restriction implementation documentation. This fact is fully captured in existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The Signet CLI setup wizard was originally configured to offer 7 different harness/connector options to users","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already captured by candidate [4] (ID: cc7a8374), which documents the same setup wizard restriction decision: reduction from 7 harness options to 3 supported platforms. Candidate [5] provides implementation details. No new information to add.","fact":{"content":"The Signet CLI setup wizard was restricted to only supported connectors, reducing the available platform options from 7 to 3","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate 2 (cc7a8374-...) already captures the essential information: the setup wizard restriction was implemented to limit harness options to supported connectors (7→3) per Nicholai's request. The new fact restates this rationale without adding new details.","fact":{"content":"The setup wizard restriction to supported connectors was implemented per Nicholai's request to limit available harness options","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 66e65d61-c55e-4415-895e-3c6d413d2150
memory_id: fac304bc-0470-4bc9-8bfd-711acff8daf7
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:18:45.094Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:19:58.053Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:17:49.091Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:19:58.053Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The setup wizard in packages/cli/src/cli.ts (lines 1628-1664) was modified to restrict harness choice options","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The setup wizard now supports only Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw as available harness choices","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Cursor, Windsurf, ChatGPT, and Gemini harness options were removed from the setup wizard because they are unsupported","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Only three harnesses are currently maintained by Signet: Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"packages/cli/src/cli.ts","relationship":"contains","target":"setup wizard","confidence":0.95},{"source":"setup wizard","relationship":"supports","target":"Claude Code","confidence":0.95},{"source":"setup wizard","relationship":"supports","target":"OpenCode","confidence":0.95},{"source":"setup wizard","relationship":"supports","target":"OpenClaw","confidence":0.95},{"source":"setup wizard","relationship":"removed","target":"Cursor","confidence":0.9},{"source":"setup wizard","relationship":"removed","target":"Windsurf","confidence":0.9},{"source":"setup wizard","relationship":"removed","target":"ChatGPT","confidence":0.9},{"source":"setup wizard","relationship":"removed","target":"Gemini","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate ID fac304bc-0470-4bc9-8bfd-711acff8daf7 already documents this exact change: modifications to packages/cli/src/cli.ts lines 1628-1664 to restrict setup wizard to supported connectors (Claude Code, OpenCode, OpenClaw only). The new fact adds no new information beyond what's already captured.","fact":{"content":"The setup wizard in packages/cli/src/cli.ts (lines 1628-1664) was modified to restrict harness choice options","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate 2 (cc7a8374...) already captures this fact: it explicitly states the setup wizard was restricted to 3 supported platforms (Claude Code, OpenCode, OpenClaw), reducing from 7 original options. Candidate 3 provides implementation details. The new fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The setup wizard now supports only Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw as available harness choices","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 already captures the specific implementation of this decision - it documents the exact removal of Cursor, Windsurf, ChatGPT, and Gemini from the setup wizard. The new fact restates the same information (which harnesses were removed and why), adding no new substantive details beyond what's already stored.","fact":{"content":"Cursor, Windsurf, ChatGPT, and Gemini harness options were removed from the setup wizard because they are unsupported","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already captured in candidate [4], which documents the specific cli.ts changes that restricted setup wizard to Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw by removing Cursor, Windsurf, ChatGPT, and Gemini. Existing memory is more detailed and actionable.","fact":{"content":"Only three harnesses are currently maintained by Signet: Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: ac817f6d-1751-45e9-a06f-ed54f481b2fb
memory_id: 358317b4-b732-4fe8-adf2-9e2e0e580293
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:20:00.058Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:20:43.276Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:17:49.107Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:20:43.276Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The conversation import confirmation prompt (wantImport) was removed from the CLI setup wizard in packages/cli/src/cli.ts, previously allowing users to import conversations during initial setup","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The conditional block `if (wantImport) { migrateWizard() }` was deleted from packages/cli/src/cli.ts, eliminating the migration pathway that called migrateWizard() when users opted to import conversations","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"CLI setup wizard (packages/cli/src/cli.ts)","relationship":"removed","target":"conversation import prompt","confidence":0.9},{"source":"CLI setup wizard (packages/cli/src/cli.ts)","relationship":"removed","target":"migrateWizard() call","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] (ID: 358317b4...) already captures this exact change: 'Removed conversation import prompt (lines 1853-1857): Eliminated the wantImport confirmation that allowed users to import conversations during setup.' The new fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The conversation import confirmation prompt (wantImport) was removed from the CLI setup wizard in packages/cli/src/cli.ts, previously allowing users to import conversations during initial setup","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [3] already captures this exact change: 'Removed import conditional (lines 2125-2127): Deleted the `if (wantImport)` block that called `migrateWizard()`'. The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The conditional block `if (wantImport) { migrateWizard() }` was deleted from packages/cli/src/cli.ts, eliminating the migration pathway that called migrateWizard() when users opted to import conversations","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 7e264cda-7425-4198-9c53-88141079602f
memory_id: 0949b4ce-4408-4ffa-afbf-c3ecde395335
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:20:45.277Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:21:36.180Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:17:49.120Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:21:36.180Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The migrateWizard() stub function was deleted from packages/cli/src/cli.ts (lines 2356-2385)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The program.command('migrate') CLI command registration was deleted from packages/cli/src/cli.ts (lines 2887-2894)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The migrate command has been removed from the Signet CLI tool","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"migrateWizard() function","relationship":"was_deleted_from","target":"packages/cli/src/cli.ts","confidence":0.95},{"source":"program.command('migrate')","relationship":"was_deleted_from","target":"packages/cli/src/cli.ts","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents the deletion of migrateWizard() at lines 2356-2385, making the new fact redundant.","fact":{"content":"The migrateWizard() stub function was deleted from packages/cli/src/cli.ts (lines 2356-2385)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate #5 (ID: 0949b4ce-4408-4ffa-afbf-c3ecde395335) already explicitly documents that the `program.command('migrate')` CLI command registration was deleted at lines 2887-2894 in packages/cli/src/cli.ts. The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The program.command('migrate') CLI command registration was deleted from packages/cli/src/cli.ts (lines 2887-2894)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents this exact change: 'Removed migrate command registration (lines 2887-2894): Deleted the program.command(\"migrate\") CLI command.' No new information to add.","fact":{"content":"The migrate command has been removed from the Signet CLI tool","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: f7710241-d6cd-4f44-8ccd-2e6cf7ee9288
memory_id: fcd2094a-d3b3-4e4f-9738-899181b369f6
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:21:38.182Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:22:48.814Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:17:49.140Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:22:48.814Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The verification process includes running `bun run typecheck` to ensure no dead references exist in the codebase","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The verification process includes running `bun run lint` to verify clean code formatting","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The verification process includes a manual test executing `bun packages/cli/src/cli.ts setup` to confirm the CLI setup wizard displays exactly 3 harness options","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The manual test of `bun packages/cli/src/cli.ts setup` verifies that no import prompt appears during execution","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"bun run typecheck","relationship":"ensures","target":"no dead references","confidence":0.95},{"source":"bun run lint","relationship":"verifies","target":"clean formatting","confidence":0.95},{"source":"bun packages/cli/src/cli.ts setup","relationship":"displays","target":"3 harness options","confidence":0.9},{"source":"bun packages/cli/src/cli.ts setup","relationship":"does_not_display","target":"import prompt","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Candidate [5] already contains the exact information: 'bun run typecheck — ensure no dead references' as part of verification final checks. New fact is fully covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The verification process includes running `bun run typecheck` to ensure no dead references exist in the codebase","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 (fcd2094a...) already comprehensively covers this fact in its verification checklist, explicitly listing `bun run lint — verify clean formatting` as a final verification step. The new fact is fully subsumed by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The verification process includes running `bun run lint` to verify clean code formatting","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already covers this exact verification step: 'Manual test: `bun packages/cli/src/cli.ts setup` — confirm 3 harness options appear'. New fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The verification process includes a manual test executing `bun packages/cli/src/cli.ts setup` to confirm the CLI setup wizard displays exactly 3 harness options","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already explicitly documents this verification: 'Manual test: `bun packages/cli/src/cli.ts setup` — confirm 3 harness options appear, no import prompt'. The new fact is identical in content, just rephrased.","fact":{"content":"The manual test of `bun packages/cli/src/cli.ts setup` verifies that no import prompt appears during execution","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 7e3f2e49-51ac-4e2a-bb58-5676add4d4c7
memory_id: addd92e2-00b9-436e-8813-722d99f80e55
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:31:42.931Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:32:38.944Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:31:42.478Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:32:38.944Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Nicholai proposed posting about Signet in OpenClaw discussions to reach community members interested in portable agent identity","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The team decided to use a problem-first, solution-focused framing for OpenClaw community posts about Signet rather than a straightforward project introduction","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Problem-first framing was chosen over straightforward project introduction because it resonates better with community members who identify with specific pain points, making the value proposition clearer through concrete problems rather than abstract features","type":"rationale","confidence":0.8}],"entities":[{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"proposed","target":"OpenClaw community post about Signet","confidence":0.95},{"source":"team","relationship":"decided on","target":"problem-first, solution-focused framing","confidence":0.9},{"source":"team","relationship":"rejected","target":"straightforward project introduction","confidence":0.85},{"source":"Signet post","relationship":"targets","target":"portable agent identity community members","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures this decision with additional context about the clarification process and final framing strategy (problem-first approach). The new fact is less detailed than the existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai proposed posting about Signet in OpenClaw discussions to reach community members interested in portable agent identity","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This decision is already well-covered by existing memories [4] and [5]. Candidate [4] explicitly states the same decision (problem-first, solution-focused framing vs. straightforward introduction), and [5] provides additional context about the post angle and platform. No new information to capture.","fact":{"content":"The team decided to use a problem-first, solution-focused framing for OpenClaw community posts about Signet rather than a straightforward project introduction","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"103158db-995d-4c3c-ab0f-ea5c6d121266","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact provides the underlying rationale for the problem-first approach already documented in candidate [5]. Merging them creates a complete picture: both the decision (problem/solution format) and the reasoning (resonates with pain-point-aware community members). The rationale strengthens understanding of why this approach was chosen over alternatives.","fact":{"content":"Problem-first framing was chosen over straightforward project introduction because it resonates better with community members who identify with specific pain points, making the value proposition clearer through concrete problems rather than abstract features","type":"rationale","confidence":0.8},"targetContent":"## Key Decisions **Post Angle**: Problem/solution discussion format — lead with the pain point of agent memory fragmentation across platforms, then introduce Signet as a practical approach. This conversational framing is more engaging than a cold \"here's my project\" announcement. **Platform**: GitHub Discussions on the OpenClaw repository, targeting the core community where friction exists."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 35bc109e-d595-4adf-86d4-ccd749939ce8
memory_id: 103158db-995d-4c3c-ab0f-ea5c6d121266
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:32:40.989Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:33:31.108Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:31:42.495Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:33:31.108Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Problem-first framing was chosen over straightforward project introduction as the approach to present a project to the community","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Problem-first framing was selected because: (1) it resonates better with community members who identify with specific pain points, (2) it makes the value proposition clearer through concrete problems rather than abstract features. Straightforward project introduction was rejected because it presents abstract features without connecting to community pain points.","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"project presentation strategy","relationship":"chose","target":"problem-first framing","confidence":0.9},{"source":"project presentation strategy","relationship":"rejected","target":"straightforward project introduction","confidence":0.9},{"source":"problem-first framing","relationship":"resonates_with","target":"community members who identify with specific pain points","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The decision is already fully captured in candidate 4 (ID: addd92e2-00b9-436e-8813-722d99f80e55), which explicitly documents that the team decided on 'problem-first, solution-focused framing rather than a straightforward project introduction.' The new fact restates the same decision without adding new information. Candidate 5 provides the supporting rationale. No duplicate needed.","fact":{"content":"Problem-first framing was chosen over straightforward project introduction as the approach to present a project to the community","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"103158db-995d-4c3c-ab0f-ea5c6d121266","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact provides more explicit reasoning structure and includes the rejection rationale (straightforward introduction rejected because it presents abstract features without connecting to pain points). Merging makes the existing memory more complete and actionable.","fact":{"content":"Problem-first framing was selected because: (1) it resonates better with community members who identify with specific pain points, (2) it makes the value proposition clearer through concrete problems rather than abstract features. Straightforward project introduction was rejected because it presents abstract features without connecting to community pain points.","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"Problem-first framing was chosen over straightforward project introduction because it resonates better with community members who identify with specific pain points, making the value proposition clearer through concrete problems rather than abstract features"}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 7353314b-0ea6-41dc-93f0-eb38588e1ff6
memory_id: d8f3ab64-7f10-49a4-85b6-856148bb52dd
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:33:33.108Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:34:50.093Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:31:42.513Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:34:50.093Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The OpenClaw community outreach strategy focuses on addressing real user pain points (memory loss, session isolation, multi-harness complexity, secrets management) rather than feature comparison with other platforms","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Signet is positioned as a practical solution to specific OpenClaw pain points including memory continuity issues (#842) and secrets management concerns (#9676)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The OpenClaw discussion post will introduce Signet's approach briefly without overselling features or benefits","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The OpenClaw discussion post will explicitly invite community feedback and discussion as part of engagement strategy","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"OpenClaw users","relationship":"experience","target":"memory loss, session isolation, multi-harness complexity","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"addresses","target":"OpenClaw pain points","confidence":0.9},{"source":"discussion post","relationship":"targets","target":"OpenClaw community","confidence":0.95},{"source":"OpenClaw","relationship":"tracks issues","target":"#842 (memory), #9676 (secrets)","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"addd92e2-00b9-436e-8813-722d99f80e55","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact provides clearer articulation of the decision already in [4]. Both address the same strategic choice: problem-first framing focused on real pain points (memory loss, session isolation, multi-harness complexity, secrets management) rather than feature comparison. Merging strengthens the existing decision with more specific, actionable details.","fact":{"content":"The OpenClaw community outreach strategy focuses on addressing real user pain points (memory loss, session isolation, multi-harness complexity, secrets management) rather than feature comparison with other platforms","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"## OpenClaw Community Post Planning Nicholai proposed posting about Signet in OpenClaw discussions to reach community members interested in portable agent identity. After clarifying questions, the team decided on a problem-first, solution-focused framing rather than a straightforward project introduction."},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"12fd8ec4-3a72-4c82-9d53-cbec2bce0d6e","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact provides concrete examples (#842 memory, #9676 secrets) that refine the existing positioning rationale. Should merge to make the OpenClaw engagement strategy more specific and actionable.","fact":{"content":"Signet is positioned as a practical solution to specific OpenClaw pain points including memory continuity issues (#842) and secrets management concerns (#9676)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"Signet positioning leverages community pain points (memory injection, secret management) to demonstrate relevance and value to OpenClaw users"},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact is already covered by candidate [5] which explicitly states 'Brief introduction of the approach without overselling' and candidate [4] which describes the problem-first framing strategy. No new information or contradiction detected.","fact":{"content":"The OpenClaw discussion post will introduce Signet's approach briefly without overselling features or benefits","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.88,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this concept explicitly: 'Invitation for feedback and discussion' is listed as a key element of the draft discussion post. The new fact restates this aspect without adding substantial new information beyond what's already documented in the next steps.","fact":{"content":"The OpenClaw discussion post will explicitly invite community feedback and discussion as part of engagement strategy","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":2,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 58ea6e10-8bb3-4f7c-8b94-13dd09c25d07
memory_id: 8832e5c5-4c8c-4b58-b40c-5f285105b656
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:38:56.196Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:40:09.972Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:38:55.454Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:40:09.972Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Nicholai initiated a debugging session on the `nicholai/non-interactive-setup-providers` branch to investigate an error with scheduled tasks in the dashboard","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"An error occurs when running scheduled tasks from the dashboard, preventing their execution","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"An error screenshot was provided in the session but the full error details were truncated in the session log","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The session objective is to identify and resolve the root cause of the scheduled tasks failure","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"initiated","target":"debugging session","confidence":0.95},{"source":"debugging session","relationship":"on branch","target":"nicholai/non-interactive-setup-providers","confidence":0.95},{"source":"debugging session","relationship":"investigates","target":"scheduled tasks dashboard error","confidence":0.9},{"source":"error","relationship":"occurs in","target":"dashboard scheduled tasks execution","confidence":0.9},{"source":"error screenshot","relationship":"truncated in","target":"session log","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing candidate [1] already comprehensively covers this fact—it describes the same debugging session on the same branch investigating the same scheduled tasks dashboard error. The candidate includes additional context (error screenshot, truncated logs) that makes it more detailed than the new fact.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai initiated a debugging session on the `nicholai/non-interactive-setup-providers` branch to investigate an error with scheduled tasks in the dashboard","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [2] already captures this exact issue: 'an error occurring when running scheduled tasks from the dashboard'. The new fact is a rephrasing of the same problem without additional details. Candidate [2] contains more context (screenshot provided, details truncated, debugging session initiated).","fact":{"content":"An error occurs when running scheduled tasks from the dashboard, preventing their execution","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"e934c5c9-488e-45d5-9cc0-2b14fb3b6a59","confidence":0.8,"reason":"New fact provides specific evidence of why diagnostic phase was incomplete—error screenshot details were truncated in the session log. This concretizes the existing memory about session interruption during diagnostics by adding the specific data loss that prevented full root cause analysis.","fact":{"content":"An error screenshot was provided in the session but the full error details were truncated in the session log","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"The session was interrupted during the diagnostic phase before root cause analysis or remediation steps were completed."},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"8832e5c5-4c8c-4b58-b40c-5f285105b656","confidence":0.8,"reason":"New fact clarifies the current session objective for the scheduled tasks issue already documented in candidate [5]. Merge to create a single, actionable procedural note about the debugging session's explicit goal.","fact":{"content":"The session objective is to identify and resolve the root cause of the scheduled tasks failure","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"## Scheduled Tasks Dashboard Issue Nicholai initiated a session on the `nicholai/non-interactive-setup-providers` branch to investigate an error occurring when running scheduled tasks from the dashboard. An error screenshot was provided but the full details were truncated in the session log. This appears to be the beginning of a debugging session aimed at identifying and resolving the root cause of the failure."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":2,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: d8affa2f-6555-4bec-886e-12cb418cc39c
memory_id: d77dbdc3-799a-4974-9c77-8f3cafbd4260
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:40:11.974Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:42:01.091Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:38:55.469Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:42:01.091Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The file .github/workflows/release.yml has uncommitted modifications in the current working tree","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The file packages/cli/dashboard/src/routes/+page.svelte has uncommitted modifications in the current working tree","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The files public/memory-loop-blueprint.jpg and public/memory-loop-v2-light.jpg have been deleted from the working tree","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"A new file docs/specs/planning/daemon-rust-rewrite.md has been created and staged for commit","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The current branch implements non-interactive setup provider handling functionality","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Recent PRs to the signetai codebase introduced explicit provider requirements for non-interactive setup operations","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The non-interactive setup provider handling work builds upon and extends prior PRs that introduced explicit provider requirements","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"release.yml","relationship":"has_uncommitted_changes_in","target":"working_tree","confidence":0.95},{"source":"dashboard_page_component","relationship":"has_uncommitted_changes_in","target":"working_tree","confidence":0.95},{"source":"memory_loop_images","relationship":"deleted_from","target":"public_directory","confidence":0.95},{"source":"daemon_rust_rewrite_spec","relationship":"added_to","target":"docs/specs/planning","confidence":0.95},{"source":"current_branch","relationship":"implements","target":"non_interactive_setup_provider_handling","confidence":0.9},{"source":"non_interactive_setup_provider_handling","relationship":"depends_on","target":"explicit_provider_requirements_PRs","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate #5 already documents uncommitted modifications to `.github/workflows/release.yml` as part of the repository state snapshot. This new fact confirms the existing memory is accurate and adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The file .github/workflows/release.yml has uncommitted modifications in the current working tree","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate ID d77dbdc3 already contains this information as part of the repository state snapshot. It explicitly lists 'packages/cli/dashboard/src/routes/+page.svelte' as a modified file in the current working tree.","fact":{"content":"The file packages/cli/dashboard/src/routes/+page.svelte has uncommitted modifications in the current working tree","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents the repository state including these exact file deletions: 'Deleted: `public/memory-loop-blueprint.jpg`, `public/memory-loop-v2-light.jpg`'. This new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The files public/memory-loop-blueprint.jpg and public/memory-loop-v2-light.jpg have been deleted from the working tree","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate #5 (Repository State) already explicitly documents this file creation: 'New file: `docs/specs/planning/daemon-rust-rewrite.md`' as part of the session's uncommitted changes","fact":{"content":"A new file docs/specs/planning/daemon-rust-rewrite.md has been created and staged for commit","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 2 already captures this fact: 'The branch contains work on non-interactive setup provider handling, building on recent PRs that introduced explicit provider requirements for setup.' No new information to add or update.","fact":{"content":"The current branch implements non-interactive setup provider handling functionality","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact describes recent architectural changes to provider requirements, which is distinct from existing bug hunting and prioritization preferences. No existing memory covers this specific codebase change.","fact":{"content":"Recent PRs to the signetai codebase introduced explicit provider requirements for non-interactive setup operations","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] (d77dbdc3-799a-4974-9c77-8f3cafbd4260) already captures this exact fact: 'The branch contains work on non-interactive setup provider handling, building on recent PRs that introduced explicit provider requirements for setup.' No new information to merge.","fact":{"content":"The non-interactive setup provider handling work builds upon and extends prior PRs that introduced explicit provider requirements","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":1,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":1},"warnings":[]}


id: c85a5ac8-a36d-4a04-9f26-3a90a71c7fb8
memory_id: 393c436d-08b5-411f-90b1-a03c83ab174a
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:53:03.326Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:54:37.008Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:53:02.378Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:54:37.008Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The OpenMarketUI project contains a pm-server Rust binary that can be started with `cargo run -p pm-server`","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"An attempt to start pm-server in OpenMarketUI failed with exit code 101, indicating a compilation, linking, or runtime initialization error","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"During troubleshooting of the pm-server startup failure, background task output retrieval encountered file access issues and the investigation was incomplete","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"OpenMarketUI is a Rust project using Cargo as its build and package management tool","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"attempted","target":"starting pm-server in OpenMarketUI","confidence":0.95},{"source":"pm-server","relationship":"is_component_of","target":"OpenMarketUI project","confidence":0.95},{"source":"pm-server startup","relationship":"failed_with_exit_code","target":"101","confidence":0.9},{"source":"OpenMarketUI","relationship":"uses_build_tool","target":"Cargo","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"393c436d-08b5-411f-90b1-a03c83ab174a","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate 5 documents an attempt to run the exact same command (`cargo run -p pm-server`). The new fact clarifies this as the canonical procedure for starting pm-server. Merging provides useful context: the correct command, plus a note that a previous attempt failed with exit code 101 (needs debugging).","fact":{"content":"The OpenMarketUI project contains a pm-server Rust binary that can be started with `cargo run -p pm-server`","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"## PM Server Startup Attempt Nicholai requested starting the pm-server in the OpenMarketUI project. The assistant initiated `cargo run -p pm-server` in the background, but the command failed with exit code 101. Attempts to retrieve error details from the background task output were unsuccessful due to file access issues. The conversation was incomplete, cutting off mid-troubleshooting. No resolution was reached."},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"393c436d-08b5-411f-90b1-a03c83ab174a","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact provides specific interpretation of the exit code 101 (compilation/linking/runtime error) that already appears in candidate [5]. Updating candidate to include this diagnostic detail enriches understanding of the pm-server startup failure.","fact":{"content":"An attempt to start pm-server in OpenMarketUI failed with exit code 101, indicating a compilation, linking, or runtime initialization error","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"## PM Server Startup Attempt Nicholai requested starting the pm-server in the OpenMarketUI project. The assistant initiated `cargo run -p pm-server` in the background, but the command failed with exit code 101. Attempts to retrieve error details from the background task output were unsuccessful due to file access issues. The conversation was incomplete, cutting off mid-troubleshooting. No resolution was reached."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 (ID: 393c436d) already comprehensively covers this fact: pm-server startup failure, background task output retrieval issues, file access problems, and incomplete investigation. The new fact adds no additional information.","fact":{"content":"During troubleshooting of the pm-server startup failure, background task output retrieval encountered file access issues and the investigation was incomplete","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.05,"reason":"New fact contradicts existing knowledge. Memory context shows OpenMarketUI is a TypeScript project using Bun/Turbo at /home/nicholai/signet/signetai, not Rust/Cargo. None of the 5 candidates match OpenMarketUI. Reject this conflicting information.","fact":{"content":"OpenMarketUI is a Rust project using Cargo as its build and package management tool","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":2,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 3fca3747-1fca-4348-8626-d742224e0847
memory_id: 4ea8d16b-ebc7-41dc-b2dd-4c2dbaef9bba
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:55:25.055Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:56:38.475Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:55:25.024Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:56:38.475Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"In opentui, pressing the Enter key generates key.name = \"return\" instead of \"enter\"","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The keybindings.ts file's enter binding was updated to [\"enter\", \"return\", \"l\"] to support opentui's Enter key behavior","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The keybindings.ts enter binding was updated to include \"return\" because opentui sends key.name = \"return\" for the Enter key instead of the expected \"enter\" value","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Any future keybinding in the codebase that needs Enter key support must include \"return\" in its key mapping array","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"opentui","relationship":"sends","target":"key.name = \"return\" for Enter key","confidence":0.95},{"source":"keybindings.ts enter binding","relationship":"was updated to","target":"[\"enter\", \"return\", \"l\"]","confidence":0.9},{"source":"future keybindings","relationship":"must include","target":"\"return\" for Enter key support","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate #3 already comprehensively documents this exact opentui behavior: Enter key sends key.name = 'return' (not 'enter'), and includes the solution (keybindings must include 'return'). New fact is redundant and fully covered.","fact":{"content":"In opentui, pressing the Enter key generates key.name = \"return\" instead of \"enter\"","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate #5 already covers this exact fact with additional context. It documents the keybindings.ts enter binding update to [\"enter\", \"return\", \"l\"] and explains why (opentui sends \"return\" not \"enter\"). The existing memory is actually more complete as it includes the underlying cause and a forward-looking rule for future keybindings.","fact":{"content":"The keybindings.ts file's enter binding was updated to [\"enter\", \"return\", \"l\"] to support opentui's Enter key behavior","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact information as a rule: it documents the opentui key mapping behavior (Enter sends 'return'), the keybindings.ts fix applied, and includes the rationale implicitly ('to fix this'). The new fact adds no additional information beyond what's already stored.","fact":{"content":"The keybindings.ts enter binding was updated to include \"return\" because opentui sends key.name = \"return\" for the Enter key instead of the expected \"enter\" value","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this procedural rule with full context: it explains that opentui's Enter key sends key.name='return', documents the specific fix applied (keybindings.ts was updated to include 'return'), and establishes the forward-looking rule for future keybindings. The new fact restates the rule in more abstract form but adds no new information beyond what's already in the existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Any future keybinding in the codebase that needs Enter key support must include \"return\" in its key mapping array","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 018bb126-f6a9-4af0-b3ab-e9f0ae3e4a79
memory_id: ae77b2cd-730b-4a9a-b211-4d33d5a8c9a3
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T11:56:40.476Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T11:58:01.096Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T11:55:28.279Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T11:58:01.096Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The Kalshi API trades endpoint changed the `price` field from integer (cents) to float (dollars, e.g. 0.41)","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The Kalshi API trades endpoint `yes_price` field remains integer cents and was not changed","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The Trade struct in pm-kalshi/src/data/fetcher.rs uses serde_json::Value for both `price` and `yes_price` fields","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The Trade struct implements flexible numeric extraction to handle either integer or float types for the price and yes_price fields","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Using serde_json::Value in the Trade struct allows handling the Kalshi API breaking change where price field type changed from integer to float while yes_price remained integer","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"Kalshi API trades endpoint","relationship":"changed field type","target":"price field (integer cents → float dollars)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Kalshi API trades endpoint","relationship":"keeps field unchanged","target":"yes_price field (integer cents)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Trade struct (pm-kalshi/src/data/fetcher.rs)","relationship":"uses for flexible parsing","target":"serde_json::Value","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [5] already contains this exact fact with additional implementation details (yes_price behavior and Trade struct with serde_json::Value handling). New fact is redundant and less detailed than existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The Kalshi API trades endpoint changed the `price` field from integer (cents) to float (dollars, e.g. 0.41)","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing candidate [2] already captures this fact: it explicitly states '`yes_price` is still integer cents (41)'. The new fact provides no additional information beyond what's already stored.","fact":{"content":"The Kalshi API trades endpoint `yes_price` field remains integer cents and was not changed","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing candidate already documents that Trade struct uses serde_json::Value for both fields, plus context about API change and flexible extraction","fact":{"content":"The Trade struct in pm-kalshi/src/data/fetcher.rs uses serde_json::Value for both `price` and `yes_price` fields","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate #5 already documents this exact implementation detail: 'The Trade struct in pm-kalshi/src/data/fetcher.rs uses serde_json::Value for both fields with flexible numeric extraction to handle either type.' The new fact is redundant and fully covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The Trade struct implements flexible numeric extraction to handle either integer or float types for the price and yes_price fields","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"ae77b2cd-730b-4a9a-b211-4d33d5a8c9a3","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact provides explicit rationale for existing technical implementation. Candidate 5 already documents the API change and serde_json::Value solution; updating it to emphasize this as an intentional design decision to handle the breaking change improves clarity and decision traceability.","fact":{"content":"Using serde_json::Value in the Trade struct allows handling the Kalshi API breaking change where price field type changed from integer to float while yes_price remained integer","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"Kalshi API trades endpoint changed: the `price` field is now a float (dollars, e.g. 0.41) instead of integer (cents). `yes_price` is still integer cents (41). The Trade struct in pm-kalshi/src/data/fetcher.rs uses serde_json::Value for both fields with flexible numeric extraction to handle either type."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: db630cce-e25b-46cb-9b4d-db0c83b6ea6f
memory_id: d4070bc4-a071-4256-9e81-f4e9b2c169d7
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T12:33:49.279Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T12:35:26.143Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T12:33:48.140Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T12:35:26.143Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The Signet documentation block in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` contains a broken CLI reference that needs to be removed","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The actual secret management workflow uses `secret_list` MCP tool for discovering available secrets and `secret_exec` MCP tool for executing commands with secrets injected as environment variables","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The documentation in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` should be updated to replace the broken CLI reference with documentation of the `secret_list` and `secret_exec` MCP tools workflow","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"packages/core/src/markdown.ts","relationship":"contains","target":"Signet documentation block","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet documentation block","relationship":"has broken reference","target":"CLI reference","confidence":0.9},{"source":"secret management workflow","relationship":"uses","target":"secret_list MCP tool","confidence":0.95},{"source":"secret management workflow","relationship":"uses","target":"secret_exec MCP tool","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate 5 (d4070bc4) is a comprehensive issue that already covers this fact: it identifies the broken CLI reference in packages/core/src/markdown.ts AND tracks the replacement with proper MCP tool documentation. The new fact is a narrower subset of what's already being tracked.","fact":{"content":"The Signet documentation block in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` contains a broken CLI reference that needs to be removed","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This decision is already captured in candidate [4], which states the same action: update markdown.ts documentation to document the MCP tool workflow instead of the broken CLI reference. The new fact is a rephrase/confirmation of existing memory, not a refinement.","fact":{"content":"The documentation in `packages/core/src/markdown.ts` should be updated to replace the broken CLI reference with documentation of the `secret_list` and `secret_exec` MCP tools workflow","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":["Decision LLM error for fact: claude-code exit 143: "]}


id: 918d9466-fa96-4735-8fc6-5586075c7869
memory_id: 6d86d91d-43ca-471b-ad0d-e7c9741e4381
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T12:35:28.145Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T12:36:02.568Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T12:33:48.389Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T12:36:02.568Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A session was interrupted during the diagnostic phase before root cause analysis or remediation steps were completed","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"session","relationship":"interrupted_during","target":"diagnostic phase","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":1,"reason":"New fact is identical to existing candidate [5] (ID: 6d86d91d-43ca-471b-ad0d-e7c9741e4381). Already covered in memory.","fact":{"content":"A session was interrupted during the diagnostic phase before root cause analysis or remediation steps were completed","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: aaeeed64-f905-4005-97e6-1f6c6b50d4bd
memory_id: 5f37ea7e-4012-4582-83b4-18aec3cbf04c
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:22:41.356Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:24:14.233Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:22:40.333Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:24:14.233Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Signet ships with pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous maintenance features disabled by default","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The loadPipelineConfig function uses '=== true' checks that hardcode absent configuration booleans to false, ignoring the DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"New users experience suboptimal product functionality because critical features (pipeline, graph, reranker, autonomous) are disabled by default","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Existing Signet users who never explicitly configured pipeline/graph/reranker/autonomous values experience suboptimal performance due to hardcoded false defaults in loadPipelineConfig","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Nicholai submitted a detailed plan to fix Signet's disabled-by-default features configuration issue","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"submitted","target":"plan to fix default configuration","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"ships-disabled-by-default","target":"pipeline feature","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"ships-disabled-by-default","target":"graph feature","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"ships-disabled-by-default","target":"reranker feature","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"ships-disabled-by-default","target":"autonomous maintenance feature","confidence":0.95},{"source":"loadPipelineConfig","relationship":"uses","target":"'=== true' checks","confidence":0.95},{"source":"loadPipelineConfig","relationship":"ignores","target":"DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant","confidence":0.9},{"source":"disabled-by-default features","relationship":"causes","target":"new users experience hollow product","confidence":0.9},{"source":"disabled-by-default features","relationship":"causes","target":"existing users experience suboptimal performance","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [3] (ID: 5f37ea7e-4012-4582-83b4-18aec3cbf04c) already captures this core issue with full context: 'pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous maintenance are all shipped disabled, leaving new users with a hollow product.' The new fact restates this existing knowledge without adding new information or nuance.","fact":{"content":"Signet ships with pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous maintenance features disabled by default","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already comprehensively covered by candidate [2] (Default Configuration Values Fix issue), which explicitly describes the same problem: loadPipelineConfig's '=== true' checks hardcoding absent booleans to false while ignoring DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2. Candidates [3] and [4] provide additional context on the solution. No new information to capture.","fact":{"content":"The loadPipelineConfig function uses '=== true' checks that hardcode absent configuration booleans to false, ignoring the DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate [3] (ID: 5f37ea7e) already comprehensively covers this rationale. It explicitly documents that pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous are 'shipped disabled, leaving new users with a hollow product' and explains both the user impact and technical root cause. The new fact restates the same core problem at a higher level of abstraction.","fact":{"content":"New users experience suboptimal product functionality because critical features (pipeline, graph, reranker, autonomous) are disabled by default","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [2] (5f37ea7e...) directly covers this fact: it explicitly states existing users experience suboptimal performance due to loadPipelineConfig's === true checks hardcoding absent booleans to false. The new fact is a restatement of the core problem already captured in that comprehensive issue record.","fact":{"content":"Existing Signet users who never explicitly configured pipeline/graph/reranker/autonomous values experience suboptimal performance due to hardcoded false defaults in loadPipelineConfig","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact issue and plan in detail - Nicholai's detailed plan to fix disabled-by-default features (pipeline, graph, reranker, autonomous). No new information to add or update.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai submitted a detailed plan to fix Signet's disabled-by-default features configuration issue","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 60c19ba4-0e70-452f-9ad0-c7b4c1561184
memory_id: 2b420883-aab0-4b19-bddf-ac613f3b3f78
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:24:16.236Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:25:14.047Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:22:40.348Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:25:14.047Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The planned fix involves modifications to four files with six discrete implementation steps","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Step 1 requires updating the `DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2` constant in `packages/daemon/src/memory-config.ts` to enable pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous features","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Step 1 requires changing the maintenance mode setting in `DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2` from `\"observe\"` to `\"execute\"` in `packages/daemon/src/memory-config.ts`","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant","relationship":"located in","target":"packages/daemon/src/memory-config.ts","confidence":0.95},{"source":"DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant","relationship":"enables","target":"pipeline feature","confidence":0.95},{"source":"DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant","relationship":"enables","target":"graph feature","confidence":0.95},{"source":"DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant","relationship":"enables","target":"reranker feature","confidence":0.95},{"source":"DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant","relationship":"enables","target":"autonomous feature","confidence":0.95},{"source":"DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant","relationship":"configures maintenance mode","target":"execute (changed from observe)","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","targetMemoryId":"2b420883-aab0-4b19-bddf-ac613f3b3f78","confidence":0.99,"reason":"Candidate [5] already contains this exact fact: 'The fix involves four files and six discrete steps', including the subsequent implementation details. New fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The planned fix involves modifications to four files with six discrete implementation steps","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"## Plan Structure The fix involves four files and six discrete steps: **Step 1:** Update `DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2` constant in `packages/daemon/src/memory-config.ts` to enable pipeline, graph, reranker, autonomous features, and change maintenance mode from `\"observe\"` to `\"execute\"`."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate 4 (ID: 2b420883...) already captures this exact procedural step as part of the plan structure: 'Step 1: Update DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant in packages/daemon/src/memory-config.ts to enable pipeline, graph, reranker, autonomous features...' The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Step 1 requires updating the `DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2` constant in `packages/daemon/src/memory-config.ts` to enable pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous features","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact requirement: 'change maintenance mode from \"observe\" to \"execute\"' as part of Step 1 in the plan structure. The new fact restates the same information with less context. The existing memory is more comprehensive (includes graph, reranker, autonomous features alongside the maintenance mode change).","fact":{"content":"Step 1 requires changing the maintenance mode setting in `DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2` from `\"observe\"` to `\"execute\"` in `packages/daemon/src/memory-config.ts`","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 04646f5c-552c-4861-8084-41edfe3b0dc2
memory_id: d3040baf-8afb-4b3e-8ec0-864bb9133726
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:25:16.048Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:26:29.346Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:22:40.359Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:26:29.346Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The `loadPipelineConfig` function (lines 159-268) has a boolean resolution bug where absent/null values are not properly handled, causing incorrect configuration defaults","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Current boolean check pattern in `loadPipelineConfig` uses strict equality: `raw.enabled === true`","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The fix for boolean resolution in `loadPipelineConfig` changes the pattern from `raw.enabled === true` to `typeof raw.enabled === \"boolean\" ? raw.enabled : d.enabled`","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The new boolean check pattern `typeof raw.enabled === \"boolean\" ? raw.enabled : d.enabled` respects absent values by: (1) explicitly checking if the value is a boolean type, (2) falling back to the default value (d.enabled) when raw.enabled is absent/null/undefined. The strict equality pattern was rejected because it treats null/undefined as falsy and loses the ability to distinguish 'not provided' from 'explicitly false'.","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"loadPipelineConfig","relationship":"has_bug_in","target":"boolean resolution","confidence":0.9},{"source":"loadPipelineConfig","relationship":"currently_uses","target":"strict equality check (raw.enabled === true)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"loadPipelineConfig","relationship":"will_use","target":"typeof check with fallback pattern","confidence":0.9},{"source":"typeof check pattern","relationship":"replaces","target":"strict equality check","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This bug is already documented in candidates [2] and [3]. Candidate [2] provides full context (disabled-by-default features, root cause in `=== true` checks). Candidate [3] is specifically about fixing boolean resolution in `loadPipelineConfig` (lines 159-268) using the `typeof` pattern. The new fact is a concise restatement of existing documented knowledge.","fact":{"content":"The `loadPipelineConfig` function (lines 159-268) has a boolean resolution bug where absent/null values are not properly handled, causing incorrect configuration defaults","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [3] already documents this exact pattern ('raw.enabled === true') as the current problematic state in loadPipelineConfig, alongside the proposed fix. New fact is a restatement of already-captured information.","fact":{"content":"Current boolean check pattern in `loadPipelineConfig` uses strict equality: `raw.enabled === true`","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already captured by candidate [3] (d3040baf...), which documents the exact same pattern change from `raw.enabled === true` to `typeof raw.enabled === \"boolean\" ? raw.enabled : d.enabled`. The design rationale is covered by candidates [4] and [5].","fact":{"content":"The fix for boolean resolution in `loadPipelineConfig` changes the pattern from `raw.enabled === true` to `typeof raw.enabled === \"boolean\" ? raw.enabled : d.enabled`","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"752e1972-5972-424e-a13c-51279d7d3759","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact provides detailed technical rationale for the design decision already captured in candidate [4]. Merging them creates a more complete explanation: the design principle (preserve explicit values, fall back to defaults) plus the implementation mechanics (typeof check, why it works, why strict equality was rejected).","fact":{"content":"The new boolean check pattern `typeof raw.enabled === \"boolean\" ? raw.enabled : d.enabled` respects absent values by: (1) explicitly checking if the value is a boolean type, (2) falling back to the default value (d.enabled) when raw.enabled is absent/null/undefined. The strict equality pattern was rejected because it treats null/undefined as falsy and loses the ability to distinguish 'not provided' from 'explicitly false'.","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"## Key Design Decision User-explicit values are preserved: if a user has `enabled: false` in their YAML, the `typeof` check catches it and respects their choice. Only truly absent keys get new defaults. This maintains backward compatibility."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 69ce73ea-cabd-4d1c-895e-0adf71f10f88
memory_id: 07cc5150-d3f2-4ab2-8d6c-a444183ef8f3
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:26:31.348Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:28:12.552Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:22:40.372Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:28:12.552Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A resolveBool() helper function will handle both nested and flat fallback patterns for configuration fields in the daemon","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The resolveBool() helper will process three configuration fields: graph, reranker, and autonomous","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Runtime auto-detection of the extraction provider will be added to daemon startup as Step 3 of the implementation","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The extraction provider auto-detection checks for claude CLI availability first in the daemon startup process","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"If claude CLI is unavailable, the extraction provider selection falls back to opencode as the second option","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"If opencode is unavailable, the extraction provider selection falls back to ollama as the final option","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"resolveBool()","relationship":"handles","target":"graph configuration field","confidence":0.9},{"source":"resolveBool()","relationship":"handles","target":"reranker configuration field","confidence":0.9},{"source":"resolveBool()","relationship":"handles","target":"autonomous configuration field","confidence":0.9},{"source":"daemon startup","relationship":"performs","target":"extraction provider auto-detection","confidence":0.9},{"source":"extraction provider auto-detection","relationship":"checks_first","target":"claude CLI","confidence":0.9},{"source":"extraction provider auto-detection","relationship":"fallback_to","target":"opencode","confidence":0.9},{"source":"extraction provider auto-detection","relationship":"fallback_to","target":"ollama","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already comprehensively documented in candidate [5], which specifies the full resolveBool(nested, flat, fallback) signature, its three-tier resolution pattern, and backward compatibility purpose. Candidate [4] also mentions the same helper. No new information to capture.","fact":{"content":"A resolveBool() helper function will handle both nested and flat fallback patterns for configuration fields in the daemon","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already covers this fact in detail: it explicitly mentions resolveBool(nested, flat, fallback) handling graph, reranker, and autonomous fields with a three-tier resolution pattern. The new fact adds no novel information.","fact":{"content":"The resolveBool() helper will process three configuration fields: graph, reranker, and autonomous","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [3] already captures this exact decision: 'Step 3: Add runtime auto-detection of extraction provider in daemon startup—check if `claude` CLI is available (fallback to `opencode`, then `ollama`).' The new fact confirms existing memory without new information or contradiction.","fact":{"content":"Runtime auto-detection of the extraction provider will be added to daemon startup as Step 3 of the implementation","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 4 already documents the exact same auto-detection behavior: 'Add runtime auto-detection of extraction provider in daemon startup—check if `claude` CLI is available (fallback to `opencode`, then `ollama`).' The new fact restates this without adding new detail.","fact":{"content":"The extraction provider auto-detection checks for claude CLI availability first in the daemon startup process","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"c8f79a70-34d3-482f-a338-de9aac6c0667","confidence":0.88,"reason":"New fact refines the extraction provider fallback order mentioned in candidate [5]. It specifies the exact sequence: claude CLI (primary) → opencode (secondary) → ollama (tertiary). Candidate [5] is incomplete notes; merging adds clarity about the fallback logic and CLI availability check.","fact":{"content":"If claude CLI is unavailable, the extraction provider selection falls back to opencode as the second option","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"**daemon.ts**: Add runtime auto-detection of extraction provider (claude, opencode, ollama fallback) after loading config. 3. **cli.ts**: Implement extraction provider auto-detection in setup wizard and write complete nested pipelineV2 config instead of minimal flat format. 4."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The extraction provider fallback chain (claude → opencode → ollama) is already documented in candidates [4] and [5]. Candidate [4] explicitly states 'check if `claude` CLI is available (fallback to `opencode`, then `ollama`)' and candidate [5] mentions 'Add runtime auto-detection of extraction provider (claude, opencode, ollama fallback)'. The new fact describes only the tail end (opencode → ollama) of a chain already captured in existing memories.","fact":{"content":"If opencode is unavailable, the extraction provider selection falls back to ollama as the final option","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: ff020ecb-e5ff-4323-bc61-998cbcfac552
memory_id: 759c7226-5823-4761-be72-bd824859ef92
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:28:14.567Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:29:09.705Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:22:40.383Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:29:09.705Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The CLI setup wizard should implement auto-detection to suggest an appropriate LLM provider based on what is available in the user's PATH environment","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The CLI setup wizard should write a full nested pipelineV2 configuration during setup instead of generating a minimal flat format","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The agent.yaml.template file should be updated to include a fully documented pipelineV2 section that shows all available configuration options","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"CLI setup wizard","relationship":"auto-detects","target":"LLM provider based on PATH","confidence":0.9},{"source":"CLI setup wizard","relationship":"generates","target":"full nested pipelineV2 configuration","confidence":0.9},{"source":"agent.yaml.template","relationship":"contains","target":"documented pipelineV2 section","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already documented in candidate [5] as Step 4 of the multi-step pipeline implementation plan. Candidate [5] explicitly states: '**Step 4:** Add auto-detection in CLI setup wizard to suggest appropriate provider based on PATH.' No new information to capture.","fact":{"content":"The CLI setup wizard should implement auto-detection to suggest an appropriate LLM provider based on what is available in the user's PATH environment","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already explicitly documents this as Step 5: 'Write full nested pipelineV2 config in setup wizard instead of minimal flat format.' The new fact confirms and elevates this decision (confidence 0.9) but adds no new information beyond what's already captured in the existing plan.","fact":{"content":"The CLI setup wizard should write a full nested pipelineV2 configuration during setup instead of generating a minimal flat format","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This fact is already captured in candidates [2] and [3]. Candidate [3] is particularly comprehensive, already documenting both the pipelineV2 section requirement and the rehearsal_enabled option. No new information to add.","fact":{"content":"The agent.yaml.template file should be updated to include a fully documented pipelineV2 section that shows all available configuration options","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: dbad874e-f037-4750-ba8f-c9c77c23226e
memory_id: 752e1972-5972-424e-a13c-51279d7d3759
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:29:11.706Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:30:30.658Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:22:40.401Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:30:30.658Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"For optional boolean configuration values, use the pattern `typeof raw.enabled === \"boolean\" ? raw.enabled : d.enabled` to explicitly check if a value is a boolean type, falling back to the default (d.enabled) only when the raw value is absent, null, or undefined","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Strict equality checks for optional booleans (e.g., `raw.enabled || defaultValue`) were rejected because they treat null/undefined as falsy and incorrectly fall back to the default when the value is explicitly set to false, losing the semantic distinction between 'not provided' and 'explicitly false'","type":"rationale","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The typeof-based boolean check pattern respects absent values by preserving the semantic difference between a missing/null value (should use default) and an explicit false value (should use false, not default)","type":"semantic","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"typeof boolean check pattern","relationship":"replaces","target":"strict equality pattern","confidence":0.9},{"source":"typeof boolean check pattern","relationship":"respects","target":"absent/null/undefined values","confidence":0.95},{"source":"strict equality pattern","relationship":"incorrectly_treats_as_falsy","target":"null/undefined","confidence":0.95},{"source":"strict equality pattern","relationship":"loses_distinction_between","target":"not provided vs explicitly false","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"add","confidence":0.85,"reason":"The pattern is already documented in candidate 4 (rationale explaining the `typeof` check), but the new fact serves a distinct purpose as a procedural guideline—a reusable coding pattern for the team. Candidate 4 explains *why* the pattern works; the new fact establishes *when and how to use it*. Storing this as a standalone procedural rule complements the existing rationale and makes the pattern more discoverable in future development work.","fact":{"content":"For optional boolean configuration values, use the pattern `typeof raw.enabled === \"boolean\" ? raw.enabled : d.enabled` to explicitly check if a value is a boolean type, falling back to the default (d.enabled) only when the raw value is absent, null, or undefined","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact is semantically identical to existing candidate [4], which already explains the core rationale: strict equality patterns (whether === true or ||) fail to distinguish 'not provided' from 'explicitly false', and why the typeof check pattern solves this. New fact restates the problem from a different angle (why old pattern fails vs how new pattern works) but adds no new technical insight.","fact":{"content":"Strict equality checks for optional booleans (e.g., `raw.enabled || defaultValue`) were rejected because they treat null/undefined as falsy and incorrectly fall back to the default when the value is explicitly set to false, losing the semantic distinction between 'not provided' and 'explicitly false'","type":"rationale","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures this rationale in detail: it explains that the typeof pattern respects absent values by explicitly checking for boolean type and falling back to defaults, and contrasts this with the strict equality pattern that loses the semantic difference between 'not provided' and 'explicitly false'. The new fact is a restatement of concepts already present in that memory.","fact":{"content":"The typeof-based boolean check pattern respects absent values by preserving the semantic difference between a missing/null value (should use default) and an explicit false value (should use false, not default)","type":"semantic","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":1,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":1},"warnings":[]}


id: 44e63bc9-b203-4074-bc1f-3771d87dc953
memory_id: 2b6edf37-e8be-4c07-997a-9609ae23466a
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:30:32.660Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:31:58.458Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:23:23.922Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:31:58.458Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Nicholai completed Phase 1 of the predictive memory scorer implementation","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Phase 1 of the predictive memory scorer is implemented as a Rust crate scaffold located at packages/predictor/","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The Phase 1 predictive memory scorer implements a complete training and inference pipeline for scoring memory preferences","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The predictive memory scorer pipeline is designed to operate in real-time for preference scoring","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Nicholai requested code review of the newly added packages/predictor/ crate","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"completed","target":"Phase 1 of predictive memory scorer","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Phase 1 predictive memory scorer","relationship":"implemented_as","target":"Rust crate","confidence":0.95},{"source":"packages/predictor/","relationship":"contains","target":"Phase 1 predictive memory scorer implementation","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Phase 1 predictive memory scorer","relationship":"implements","target":"training and inference pipeline","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Phase 1 predictive memory scorer","relationship":"designed_for","target":"real-time memory preference scoring","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"requested","target":"code review of packages/predictor/","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"add","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact represents a milestone completion (Phase 1 implementation) distinct from existing memories which focus on design, review, and evaluation phases. No existing candidate captures implementation progress or Phase 1 completion status.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai completed Phase 1 of the predictive memory scorer implementation","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate #5 already captures this fact with richer context: Phase 1 is a Rust crate scaffold at packages/predictor/ with full training/inference pipeline, and notes Nicholai completed and presented it. The new fact is redundant.","fact":{"content":"Phase 1 of the predictive memory scorer is implemented as a Rust crate scaffold located at packages/predictor/","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate 2b6edf37 already captures this: 'Phase 1 of the predictive memory scorer—a Rust crate scaffold implementing a complete training and inference pipeline for real-time memory preference scoring.' The new fact is a restatement of existing memory with less context.","fact":{"content":"The Phase 1 predictive memory scorer implements a complete training and inference pipeline for scoring memory preferences","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing memory [5] already captures that Phase 1 implements 'a complete training and inference pipeline for real-time memory preference scoring'. The new fact is already covered.","fact":{"content":"The predictive memory scorer pipeline is designed to operate in real-time for preference scoring","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 2b6edf37 already captures this: 'Nicholai completed and presented Phase 1 of the predictive memory scorer... He requested code review of the newly added packages/predictor/ crate.' New fact is redundant.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai requested code review of the newly added packages/predictor/ crate","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":1,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":1},"warnings":[]}


id: 004efcac-14b7-4683-99fd-8793c0904ddf
memory_id: a24dd55d-6b7d-4429-a4ae-32f1f1e221be
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:32:00.461Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:33:18.254Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:23:23.936Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:33:18.254Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Phase 1 deliverable includes an autograd engine implemented in autograd.rs providing operation-level automatic differentiation","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The autograd engine provides Rng, Param, and Tape abstractions for operation-level automatic differentiation","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The autograd engine implements custom operations: Sigmoid, MeanPool, FeatureConcat, and ListwiseLoss","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The autograd engine includes comprehensive forward and backward pass implementations","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The autograd engine implementation includes comprehensive unit tests","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"Phase 1 deliverable","relationship":"includes","target":"autograd engine","confidence":0.95},{"source":"autograd engine","relationship":"implemented in","target":"autograd.rs","confidence":0.95},{"source":"autograd engine","relationship":"provides abstractions","target":"Rng, Param, Tape","confidence":0.95},{"source":"autograd engine","relationship":"implements operations","target":"Sigmoid, MeanPool, FeatureConcat, ListwiseLoss","confidence":0.95},{"source":"autograd engine","relationship":"includes","target":"forward/backward implementations","confidence":0.95},{"source":"autograd engine","relationship":"includes","target":"unit tests","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already contains this exact fact with greater detail: 'Phase 1 deliverable includes: **Autograd engine** (autograd.rs): Operation-level automatic differentiation with Rng, Param, Tape abstractions and custom operations...'. No new information to add.","fact":{"content":"Phase 1 deliverable includes an autograd engine implemented in autograd.rs providing operation-level automatic differentiation","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this fact with explicit mention of 'Rng, Param, Tape abstractions' for operation-level automatic differentiation in autograd.rs. No new information added.","fact":{"content":"The autograd engine provides Rng, Param, and Tape abstractions for operation-level automatic differentiation","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [5] already explicitly documents these exact custom operations (Sigmoid, MeanPool, FeatureConcat, ListwiseLoss) as part of the autograd engine implementation in autograd.rs. The new fact is fully contained within existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The autograd engine implements custom operations: Sigmoid, MeanPool, FeatureConcat, and ListwiseLoss","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already explicitly documents 'comprehensive forward/backward implementations' as part of the Phase 1 autograd engine deliverable. The new fact adds no additional information beyond what is already captured.","fact":{"content":"The autograd engine includes comprehensive forward and backward pass implementations","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is specific to autograd engine testing (procedural detail). Candidate [1] mentions overall project tests (396+) but in verification context, not as part of the autograd implementation itself. This is a distinct implementation detail worth preserving.","fact":{"content":"The autograd engine implementation includes comprehensive unit tests","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":1,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":1},"warnings":[]}


id: 611ef3dc-2e08-4896-bcaf-2a8502aeeb34
memory_id: fd586d29-d3d3-410a-8419-41fc9de3ab9e
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:33:20.256Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:34:40.801Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:23:23.945Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:34:40.801Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The Scorer core module is implemented in model.rs and includes a CrossAttentionScorer component","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The Scorer core uses cross-attention-style ScorerConfig for configuration","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The CrossAttentionScorer component implements candidate scoring with softmax ranking for preference prediction","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The Protocol layer is implemented in protocol.rs and defines JSON-RPC protocol types","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The Protocol layer defines the service contract through JSON-RPC protocol type definitions","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"Scorer core","relationship":"implemented_in","target":"model.rs","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Scorer core","relationship":"contains","target":"CrossAttentionScorer","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Scorer core","relationship":"uses","target":"ScorerConfig","confidence":0.95},{"source":"ScorerConfig","relationship":"uses_style","target":"cross-attention","confidence":0.95},{"source":"CrossAttentionScorer","relationship":"implements","target":"candidate scoring","confidence":0.95},{"source":"CrossAttentionScorer","relationship":"uses_algorithm","target":"softmax ranking","confidence":0.95},{"source":"softmax ranking","relationship":"for_purpose","target":"preference prediction","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Protocol layer","relationship":"implemented_in","target":"protocol.rs","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Protocol layer","relationship":"defines","target":"JSON-RPC protocol types","confidence":0.95},{"source":"JSON-RPC protocol types","relationship":"specify","target":"service contract","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already contains this exact information with greater specificity: Scorer core in model.rs with CrossAttentionScorer component, plus additional details about ScorerConfig and softmax ranking implementation.","fact":{"content":"The Scorer core module is implemented in model.rs and includes a CrossAttentionScorer component","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate 5 (fd586d29-d3d3-410a-8419-41fc9de3ab9e) already explicitly documents that the Scorer core uses 'Cross-attention-style ScorerConfig' in model.rs. The new fact is redundant with existing preference-type memory.","fact":{"content":"The Scorer core uses cross-attention-style ScorerConfig for configuration","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"New fact is already fully covered by candidate [5], which explicitly documents the CrossAttentionScorer implementing candidate scoring with softmax ranking for preference prediction in the scorer core (model.rs)","fact":{"content":"The CrossAttentionScorer component implements candidate scoring with softmax ranking for preference prediction","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing memory candidate [1] already contains this exact information: Protocol layer is in protocol.rs and defines JSON-RPC protocol types. New fact is redundant.","fact":{"content":"The Protocol layer is implemented in protocol.rs and defines JSON-RPC protocol types","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"This fact is already covered by candidate [3], which explicitly states 'Protocol layer (protocol.rs): JSON-RPC protocol types defining the service contract.' The new fact is a paraphrase of existing memory content.","fact":{"content":"The Protocol layer defines the service contract through JSON-RPC protocol type definitions","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: cd20c780-f3fe-4c9b-a8ce-e7cfe21c38e7
memory_id: f7f54988-399d-4435-81af-4ad9ddade9ae
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:34:42.803Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:35:33.730Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:23:23.969Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:35:33.730Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The tokenizer.rs module implements a HashTrick tokenizer for feature hashing","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The training.rs module provides training infrastructure scaffolding that includes an Adam optimizer","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The data.rs module contains a placeholder reader for training data","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"tokenizer.rs","relationship":"implements","target":"HashTrick tokenizer","confidence":0.85},{"source":"tokenizer.rs","relationship":"uses_for","target":"feature hashing","confidence":0.85},{"source":"training.rs","relationship":"includes","target":"Adam optimizer","confidence":0.85},{"source":"data.rs","relationship":"provides","target":"placeholder training data reader","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already comprehensively covers this fact: it explicitly states '**Tokenization** (tokenizer.rs): HashTrick tokenizer for feature hashing.' This is an exact match for the new fact being stored.","fact":{"content":"The tokenizer.rs module implements a HashTrick tokenizer for feature hashing","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing memory [5] already covers training.rs scaffolding with Adam optimizer - exact match with current fact","fact":{"content":"The training.rs module provides training infrastructure scaffolding that includes an Adam optimizer","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact detail: 'Data pipeline (data.rs): Placeholder reader for training data.' The new fact is fully contained in existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The data.rs module contains a placeholder reader for training data","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 21c9dee5-9226-4092-ba0a-cebf7ed238ee
memory_id: ed38fa3a-1e15-4fb1-a37a-8f5a75a671cf
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:35:35.732Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:36:56.709Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:23:23.984Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:36:56.709Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The checkpoint.rs module provides save, load, and apply operations for model checkpoints","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The main.rs file serves as the service entry point","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The service communicates via JSON-line protocol on stdin/stdout","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The service implements status, score, and train handlers","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Cargo.toml contains the crate manifest and build configuration dependencies","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"checkpoint.rs","relationship":"provides","target":"save/load/apply operations","confidence":0.95},{"source":"checkpoint.rs","relationship":"handles","target":"model checkpoints","confidence":0.95},{"source":"main.rs","relationship":"is","target":"service entry point","confidence":0.95},{"source":"service","relationship":"uses","target":"JSON-line protocol","confidence":0.95},{"source":"service","relationship":"implements","target":"status handler","confidence":0.95},{"source":"service","relationship":"implements","target":"score handler","confidence":0.95},{"source":"service","relationship":"implements","target":"train handler","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Cargo.toml","relationship":"contains","target":"crate manifest","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [2] already covers this information: 'Persistence (checkpoint.rs): Save/load/apply for model checkpoints' is equivalent to the new fact","fact":{"content":"The checkpoint.rs module provides save, load, and apply operations for model checkpoints","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [4] already explicitly states '**Service entry point** (main.rs): JSON-line stdin/stdout service with status, score, and train handlers.' The new fact is a generalization of information already present in memory.","fact":{"content":"The main.rs file serves as the service entry point","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This fact is already well-covered by existing memories. Candidate 4 describes 'standalone Rust binary sidecar communicating with daemon via JSON-RPC 2.0 stdin/stdout' and candidate 5 explicitly states 'JSON-line stdin/stdout service with status, score, and train handlers'. The new fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The service communicates via JSON-line protocol on stdin/stdout","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already captured in candidate [5]: exact mention of 'status, score, and train handlers' as part of the service entry point (main.rs)","fact":{"content":"The service implements status, score, and train handlers","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New procedural fact about Cargo.toml structure. Candidate 5 mentions Cargo.toml files were audited but doesn't document what they contain. This foundational knowledge about Rust/Cargo manifests is distinct and should be stored separately.","fact":{"content":"Cargo.toml contains the crate manifest and build configuration dependencies","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":1,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":1},"warnings":[]}


id: 21267217-c957-4c55-9e9e-69c4cdbf91ba
memory_id: 2182ff0c-bb01-4865-8675-ec0bfe7b87b7
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:36:58.712Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:37:41.471Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:23:23.995Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:37:41.471Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The session workflow involves reading implementation files to understand codebase architecture and provide technical feedback","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Build artifacts are properly configured in .gitignore to prevent accidental commits","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"session","relationship":"involves","target":"reading implementation files","confidence":0.9},{"source":"session","relationship":"purpose","target":"understanding architecture and providing technical feedback","confidence":0.85},{"source":"build artifacts","relationship":"ignored_by","target":".gitignore","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"add","confidence":0.88,"reason":"New fact describes a general procedural workflow pattern (reading implementation files to understand architecture), distinct from existing memories which document specific past sessions or repository state. Worth storing as a standalone procedural guideline.","fact":{"content":"The session workflow involves reading implementation files to understand codebase architecture and provide technical feedback","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this fact: 'Build artifacts were properly ignored in .gitignore.' The new fact is a direct match with no new information to add.","fact":{"content":"Build artifacts are properly configured in .gitignore to prevent accidental commits","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":1,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":1},"warnings":[]}


id: f9c656a1-c041-4a6e-a7b1-a82af3944335
memory_id: c478c1e8-329b-47e0-a27c-402e0299fb87
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:37:43.472Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:39:35.394Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:25:56.339Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:39:35.394Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The Signet project ships with core features disabled by default: pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous maintenance","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Disabled core features in Signet create a 'hollow product' experience for new users, leaving them without a functional out-of-box experience","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Existing Signet users who never explicitly configured pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous maintenance settings are running suboptimal defaults","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The root cause of Signet's disabled defaults is boolean resolution logic that hardcodes absent configuration values to `false`","type":"semantic","confidence":0.9},{"content":"An implementation plan was initiated to fix Signet's ship defaults, addressing the problem that new and existing users run with core features disabled","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Signet's boolean resolution logic converts unset configuration values to `false`, causing pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous features to be disabled by default rather than enabled","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"Signet project","relationship":"ships with disabled","target":"pipeline","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet project","relationship":"ships with disabled","target":"graph","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet project","relationship":"ships with disabled","target":"reranker","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet project","relationship":"ships with disabled","target":"autonomous maintenance","confidence":0.95},{"source":"new users","relationship":"negatively affected by","target":"disabled core features","confidence":0.9},{"source":"existing users","relationship":"negatively affected by","target":"suboptimal defaults","confidence":0.9},{"source":"boolean resolution logic","relationship":"causes","target":"false defaults for absent values","confidence":0.9},{"source":"boolean resolution logic","relationship":"affects","target":"Signet configuration parsing","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Fact is already comprehensively documented in existing memories. Candidates [2], [3], [4], and [5] all describe the same issue: core features (pipeline, graph, reranker, autonomous maintenance) being disabled by default, plus the root cause and fix plan. No new information to capture.","fact":{"content":"The Signet project ships with core features disabled by default: pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous maintenance","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This fact is already well-documented in candidates [4] and [5], which both identify the same core issue: disabled defaults (pipeline, graph, reranker, autonomous) creating a hollow product experience for new users. Candidate [4] includes the technical root cause, and candidate [5] documents the implementation plan. Adding this would create redundant duplication.","fact":{"content":"Disabled core features in Signet create a 'hollow product' experience for new users, leaving them without a functional out-of-box experience","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This fact is already comprehensively covered by existing memories. Candidate 5f37ea7e (issue) and c478c1e8 (rule) both explicitly document that existing users who never configured pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous maintenance are running suboptimal defaults due to hardcoded false resolution logic. The new fact is a restatement of the core problem already captured in detail.","fact":{"content":"Existing Signet users who never explicitly configured pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous maintenance settings are running suboptimal defaults","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already covered by existing candidates [5] and [3]. Candidate [5] explicitly states 'boolean resolution logic that hardcodes absent values to `false`' as the core issue, and [3] provides detailed context about the `=== true` checks in loadPipelineConfig. No new information to capture.","fact":{"content":"The root cause of Signet's disabled defaults is boolean resolution logic that hardcodes absent configuration values to `false`","type":"semantic","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate 5 (c478c1e8-329b-47e0-a27c-402e0299fb87) already captures this same decision: 'Session began with a detailed implementation plan to fix Signet's ship defaults.' The new fact is a generalized restatement of the same planning initiation event, adding no new information beyond what's already stored.","fact":{"content":"An implementation plan was initiated to fix Signet's ship defaults, addressing the problem that new and existing users run with core features disabled","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"This technical rationale is already comprehensively covered by candidates [2] and [4]. Candidate [2] explicitly describes the `loadPipelineConfig === true` checks that hardcode absent booleans to `false`, and candidate [4] summarizes the same boolean resolution issue affecting defaults. The new fact adds no substantive information beyond existing documentation.","fact":{"content":"Signet's boolean resolution logic converts unset configuration values to `false`, causing pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous features to be disabled by default rather than enabled","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: e26b5ec5-0d3e-459e-8d03-6c681cd7c580
memory_id: 38eb28e9-9421-4677-a480-2c26d8df92e0
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:39:37.407Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:40:24.864Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:25:56.351Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:40:24.864Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The memory configuration fix involves six coordinated changes across four files","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The memory-config.ts file contains a DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant that was updated to enable pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous features","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"memory-config.ts","relationship":"contains","target":"DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant","confidence":0.95},{"source":"DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2","relationship":"enables","target":"pipeline feature","confidence":0.95},{"source":"DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2","relationship":"enables","target":"graph feature","confidence":0.95},{"source":"DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2","relationship":"enables","target":"reranker feature","confidence":0.95},{"source":"DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2","relationship":"enables","target":"autonomous feature","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already contains this exact summary statement: 'six coordinated changes across four files' and goes on to provide implementation details. The new fact is already captured and would be redundant to add or update.","fact":{"content":"The memory configuration fix involves six coordinated changes across four files","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"2b420883-aab0-4b19-bddf-ac613f3b3f78","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact confirms completion of Step 1 of the DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 update plan. Candidate 2b420883 describes this exact step as part of the fix plan. Should be updated to indicate this step has been implemented, not just planned.","fact":{"content":"The memory-config.ts file contains a DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2 constant that was updated to enable pipeline, graph, reranker, and autonomous features","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"## Plan Structure The fix involves four files and six discrete steps: **Step 1:** Update `DEFAULT_PIPELINE_V2` constant in `packages/daemon/src/memory-config.ts` to enable pipeline, graph, reranker, autonomous features, and change maintenance mode from `\"observe\"` to `\"execute\"`."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 20788147-a514-42e7-8951-6f4418ea0867
memory_id: 7b520d31-d8b8-4194-92e7-c7ee86f95327
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:40:26.866Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:41:18.139Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:25:56.362Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:41:18.139Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The loadPipelineConfig function should be modified to use typeof checks instead of === true comparisons for configuration validation","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The rationale for modifying loadPipelineConfig to use typeof checks instead of === true is to: (1) respect absent configuration values (distinguish between missing and explicitly set false), (2) fall back to defaults correctly, (3) preserve explicit user choices. The === true approach loses information about missing vs intentionally false values.","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"loadPipelineConfig","relationship":"should_use","target":"typeof checks","confidence":0.9},{"source":"loadPipelineConfig","relationship":"should_replace","target":"=== true comparisons","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 (ID: 7b520d31-d8b8-4194-92e7-c7ee86f95327) already captures this exact decision: 'Modify loadPipelineConfig to use typeof checks instead of === true comparisons, respecting absent values and falling back to defaults'. The new fact adds no additional information beyond what's already documented. Additionally, candidate 4 provides the detailed rationale explaining why this pattern is superior.","fact":{"content":"The loadPipelineConfig function should be modified to use typeof checks instead of === true comparisons for configuration validation","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"752e1972-5972-424e-a13c-51279d7d3759","confidence":0.87,"reason":"New fact is a condensed, higher-level rationale that explains the same boolean check pattern. Candidate [3] already covers the implementation mechanism and why === true was rejected, but the new fact explicitly articulates three rationale points (respecting absent values, falling back to defaults, preserving explicit choices) that should be merged into the existing rationale for completeness.","fact":{"content":"The rationale for modifying loadPipelineConfig to use typeof checks instead of === true is to: (1) respect absent configuration values (distinguish between missing and explicitly set false), (2) fall back to defaults correctly, (3) preserve explicit user choices. The === true approach loses information about missing vs intentionally false values.","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"The new boolean check pattern `typeof raw.enabled === \"boolean\" ? raw.enabled : d.enabled` respects absent values by: (1) explicitly checking if the value is a boolean type, (2) falling back to the default value (d.enabled) when raw.enabled is absent/null/undefined. The strict equality pattern was rejected because it treats null/undefined as falsy and loses the ability to distinguish 'not provided' from 'explicitly false'."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 1f294569-17df-4c5c-a853-5488303932fd
memory_id: c8f79a70-34d3-482f-a338-de9aac6c0667
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:41:20.139Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:42:01.612Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:25:56.374Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:42:01.612Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"When the claude CLI is unavailable, the extraction provider selection logic falls back to opencode as the secondary option","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"opencode is configured as the second priority extraction provider in the fallback chain after claude CLI","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"extraction provider selection","relationship":"falls back to","target":"opencode","confidence":0.95},{"source":"claude CLI unavailability","relationship":"triggers fallback to","target":"opencode","confidence":0.95},{"source":"opencode","relationship":"is secondary option for","target":"extraction provider","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [5] (ID: c8f79a70-34d3-482f-a338-de9aac6c0667) already contains this exact procedural fact: 'If claude CLI is unavailable, the extraction provider selection falls back to opencode as the second option'. New fact is a near-identical duplicate with only minor wording variation ('secondary' vs 'second').","fact":{"content":"When the claude CLI is unavailable, the extraction provider selection logic falls back to opencode as the secondary option","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already covered by existing memory [5] (procedural: 'If claude CLI is unavailable, the extraction provider selection falls back to opencode as the second option') and [4] (rationale: extraction provider fallback chain with claude→opencode→ollama). The new fact is a high-confidence restatement of established configuration already documented.","fact":{"content":"opencode is configured as the second priority extraction provider in the fallback chain after claude CLI","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 832de745-042f-4046-bc82-2f8856b3580d
memory_id: 3f02e91e-47b2-48ce-8151-6d454de684d9
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:42:03.614Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:43:01.714Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:25:56.384Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:43:01.714Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The agent.yaml.template file should include a fully documented pipelineV2 configuration section","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The pipelineV2 section in agent.yaml.template should document new default configuration values","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The rehearsal_enabled option should be documented in the pipelineV2 section of agent.yaml.template","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"agent.yaml.template","relationship":"should_document","target":"pipelineV2 section","confidence":0.95},{"source":"pipelineV2 section","relationship":"should_include_documentation_for","target":"rehearsal_enabled option","confidence":0.95},{"source":"pipelineV2 section","relationship":"should_specify","target":"new defaults","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact is already captured in candidates [2] and [3], which both document the requirement to add a fully documented pipelineV2 section to agent.yaml.template. Candidate [3] is particularly close, specifically noting the documented pipelineV2 section requirement.","fact":{"content":"The agent.yaml.template file should include a fully documented pipelineV2 configuration section","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [3] already captures this exact procedural requirement: 'Add full documented pipelineV2 section with new defaults and document rehearsal_enabled option.' The new fact is a restatement of the same requirement with slightly different phrasing.","fact":{"content":"The pipelineV2 section in agent.yaml.template should document new default configuration values","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already explicitly states: 'document rehearsal_enabled option' in the pipelineV2 section of agent.yaml.template. The new fact is redundant and fully covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The rehearsal_enabled option should be documented in the pipelineV2 section of agent.yaml.template","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 837120d1-ee0d-449b-acfa-b803ec8cb075
memory_id: 5f105883-9764-43c1-b3ac-7c689615fe91
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:43:03.715Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:44:47.596Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:25:56.397Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:44:47.596Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A helper function `resolveBool(nested, flat, fallback)` implements a three-tier resolution pattern that checks nested config, then flat fallback keys, then a final fallback value","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The `resolveBool` config resolution pattern preserves backward compatibility with flat key configs while enabling new nested default values","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Verification of the config resolution system includes typecheck, build, existing test suite, and new manual tests","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Manual testing verifies that default values are activated when config is absent (no explicit user setting)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Manual testing verifies that explicit user-provided config choices are respected and not overridden by defaults","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Manual testing verifies that provider auto-detection works correctly within the three-tier resolution pattern","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"resolveBool function","relationship":"implements","target":"three-tier config resolution pattern","confidence":0.95},{"source":"resolveBool function","relationship":"accepts parameters","target":"nested, flat, fallback","confidence":0.95},{"source":"config resolution","relationship":"preserves","target":"backward compatibility","confidence":0.9},{"source":"config resolution","relationship":"enables","target":"new nested defaults","confidence":0.9},{"source":"verification process","relationship":"includes","target":"typecheck, build, existing tests, manual tests","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate [5] already explicitly captures this exact pattern: 'A helper function `resolveBool(nested, flat, fallback)` will handle the three-tier resolution pattern for nested config with flat fallback keys.' New fact is substantially identical and adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"A helper function `resolveBool(nested, flat, fallback)` implements a three-tier resolution pattern that checks nested config, then flat fallback keys, then a final fallback value","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already covered by candidate [5] (ID: 5f105883-9764-43c1-b3ac-7c689615fe91), which explicitly describes the `resolveBool(nested, flat, fallback)` helper and its three-tier resolution pattern for backward compatibility with new defaults. New fact is a concise restatement of the same concept.","fact":{"content":"The `resolveBool` config resolution pattern preserves backward compatibility with flat key configs while enabling new nested default values","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact is already captured by candidate 5, which explicitly details the same verification approach (typecheck, build, existing tests, manual tests) for the config resolution system's resolveBool helper. Candidate 3 also covers the broader verification strategy. The new fact adds no novel information beyond existing memories.","fact":{"content":"Verification of the config resolution system includes typecheck, build, existing test suite, and new manual tests","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"5f105883-9764-43c1-b3ac-7c689615fe91","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact provides concrete verification result for the manual testing step outlined in candidate 5. Updates the verification section to document that default activation when config is absent has been manually tested and confirmed.","fact":{"content":"Manual testing verifies that default values are activated when config is absent (no explicit user setting)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"## Key Technical Details A helper function `resolveBool(nested, flat, fallback)` will handle the three-tier resolution pattern for nested config with flat fallback keys. This preserves backward compatibility while enabling new defaults. Verification includes typecheck, build, existing tests, and manual tests for: default activation when config is absent, explicit user choices being respected, and provider auto-detection working correctly."},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"752e1972-5972-424e-a13c-51279d7d3759","confidence":0.9,"reason":"The new fact verifies that the design rationale in candidate 5 (preserving explicit user choices via typeof checks) actually works in practice. Merging these strengthens the memory by documenting both the design intention and its verification.","fact":{"content":"Manual testing verifies that explicit user-provided config choices are respected and not overridden by defaults","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"The rationale for modifying loadPipelineConfig to use typeof checks instead of === true is to: (1) respect absent configuration values (distinguish between missing and explicitly set false), (2) fall back to defaults correctly, (3) preserve explicit user choices. The === true approach loses information about missing vs intentionally false values."},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"5f105883-9764-43c1-b3ac-7c689615fe91","confidence":0.9,"reason":"The new fact confirms successful completion of the verification step described in candidate 5. Candidate 5 outlines the verification plan (including manual tests for provider auto-detection within the three-tier resolution pattern), and the new fact provides evidence that this plan has been executed. Merging strengthens the memory with verified completion status.","fact":{"content":"Manual testing verifies that provider auto-detection works correctly within the three-tier resolution pattern","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"## Key Technical Details A helper function `resolveBool(nested, flat, fallback)` will handle the three-tier resolution pattern for nested config with flat fallback keys. This preserves backward compatibility while enabling new defaults. Verification includes typecheck, build, existing tests, and manual tests for: default activation when config is absent, explicit user choices being respected, and provider auto-detection working correctly."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":3,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: a0cbd8bb-2187-4491-aeb7-5fe8e9c76f57
memory_id: b960f60e-ac86-4b34-9ee0-48fcd5c66366
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:50:28.321Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:51:50.042Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:50:26.582Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:51:50.042Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Nicholai implemented a fix in packages/predictor/src/main.rs (line 79) to reject mismatched candidate_features","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The predictor previously silently zero-filled mismatched candidate_features instead of rejecting them, causing silent data corruption","type":"semantic","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The fix rejects mismatched candidate_features at packages/predictor/src/main.rs:79 instead of silently zero-filling, preventing data corruption","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Rejecting mismatched candidate_features eliminates silent data corruption in the predictor system","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"implemented","target":"predictor candidate_features validation fix","confidence":0.95},{"source":"packages/predictor/src/main.rs:79","relationship":"rejects","target":"mismatched candidate_features","confidence":0.9},{"source":"mismatched candidate_features validation","relationship":"prevents","target":"silent data corruption","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"b960f60e-ac86-4b34-9ee0-48fcd5c66366","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact provides specific implementation detail (reject mismatched candidate_features) that refines existing candidate describing the same fix in main.rs:79. Update adds specificity about what the fix does rather than just its outcome.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai implemented a fix in packages/predictor/src/main.rs (line 79) to reject mismatched candidate_features","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"## Predictor Bug Fix: Reject Mismatched candidate_features Nicholai implemented a fix to eliminate silent data corruption in `packages/predictor/src/main.rs` (line 79)."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing candidate 3b66ffde already captures this fact in detail: 'The code previously silently replaced mismatched candidate_features vectors with all-zero values when their length didn't match candidate_ids. This masked upstream bugs and degraded ranking quality without signaling the problem.' The new fact adds no new information beyond what's already documented.","fact":{"content":"The predictor previously silently zero-filled mismatched candidate_features instead of rejecting them, causing silent data corruption","type":"semantic","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already documents this same predictor fix in detail: rejects mismatched candidate_features at main.rs:79, prevents silent data corruption. New fact is a concise restatement of work already captured in existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The fix rejects mismatched candidate_features at packages/predictor/src/main.rs:79 instead of silently zero-filling, preventing data corruption","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The rationale is already well-documented in existing issue candidates 3 and 4, which explicitly describe the silent zero-fill corruption problem and the fix to reject mismatched candidate_features. The new fact restates this rationale without adding substantively new information.","fact":{"content":"Rejecting mismatched candidate_features eliminates silent data corruption in the predictor system","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 13c3d6ea-e438-4583-b7ef-bdeb7ae058de
memory_id: 3b66ffde-f0e9-4c29-a6b5-2ab47a6ed525
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:51:52.044Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:53:23.992Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:50:26.594Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:53:23.992Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The predictor code previously silently replaced mismatched candidate_features vectors with all-zero values when their length didn't match the length of candidate_ids","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Silent zero-filling of mismatched candidate_features masked upstream bugs in the prediction pipeline","type":"fact","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Silent zero-filling of mismatched candidate_features degraded ranking quality without signaling the problem to users","type":"fact","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The fix changed the predictor logic to reject mismatched candidate_features instead of silently zero-filling them","type":"decision","confidence":0.75},{"content":"Rejecting mismatched candidate_features vectors enables upstream bugs to surface, improving visibility into data quality issues and ranking problems","type":"rationale","confidence":0.8}],"entities":[{"source":"candidate_features","relationship":"length mismatch with","target":"candidate_ids","confidence":0.9},{"source":"silent zero-filling behavior","relationship":"masked","target":"upstream bugs","confidence":0.85},{"source":"silent zero-filling behavior","relationship":"degraded","target":"ranking quality","confidence":0.85},{"source":"predictor logic","relationship":"changed to reject instead of zero-fill","target":"mismatched candidate_features","confidence":0.75}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already captured in candidate [4] (ID: 3b66ffde-f0e9-4c29-a6b5-2ab47a6ed525), which documents the exact same issue: silent zero-filling of mismatched candidate_features vectors and the subsequent fix to reject them instead.","fact":{"content":"The predictor code previously silently replaced mismatched candidate_features vectors with all-zero values when their length didn't match the length of candidate_ids","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 3 (issue ID: 3b66ffde-f0e9-4c29-a6b5-2ab47a6ed525) already comprehensively describes this exact problem: silent zero-filling of mismatched candidate_features masked upstream bugs and degraded ranking quality. New fact adds no additional detail beyond what's already documented.","fact":{"content":"Silent zero-filling of mismatched candidate_features masked upstream bugs in the prediction pipeline","type":"fact","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [4] already comprehensively captures this issue: 'silently replaced mismatched candidate_features vectors with all-zero values... masked upstream bugs and degraded ranking quality without signaling the problem.' New fact is a restatement of the same problem already well-documented in existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Silent zero-filling of mismatched candidate_features degraded ranking quality without signaling the problem to users","type":"fact","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact is already comprehensively covered by existing candidates: candidate 2 states the fix decision, candidate 3 describes the problem (silent zero-fill), and candidate 5 explicitly details the solution (return explicit error instead). The new fact is a summary that doesn't add novel information.","fact":{"content":"The fix changed the predictor logic to reject mismatched candidate_features instead of silently zero-filling them","type":"decision","confidence":0.75}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"3b66ffde-f0e9-4c29-a6b5-2ab47a6ed525","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact provides the explicit rationale/benefit for the fix described in candidate [5]. The existing memory explains the bug and fix mechanism; the new fact clarifies why this matters (surfacing bugs, improving data quality visibility). Merging adds valuable context about the decision's impact.","fact":{"content":"Rejecting mismatched candidate_features vectors enables upstream bugs to surface, improving visibility into data quality issues and ranking problems","type":"rationale","confidence":0.8},"targetContent":"The code previously silently replaced mismatched `candidate_features` vectors with all-zero values when their length didn't match `candidate_ids`. This masked upstream bugs and degraded ranking quality without signaling the problem. The fix changed the logic to: 1."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: f3820cde-7e00-440b-8eb1-9f3996ba82cf
memory_id: 8a898496-fb44-4750-8755-b28ba91bdf8c
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:53:26.013Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:54:06.794Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:50:26.605Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:54:06.794Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"When candidate_features is empty, the correct behavior is to zero-fill the array, indicating the feature was not provided","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"When the length of candidate_features matches the length of candidate_ids, the correct behavior is to use candidate_features as-is, indicating it was provided correctly","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"candidate_features","relationship":"empty triggers","target":"zero-fill operation","confidence":0.85},{"source":"candidate_features length","relationship":"matches","target":"candidate_ids length","confidence":0.85},{"source":"candidate_features","relationship":"valid when length equals","target":"candidate_ids","confidence":0.8}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [8a898496] already explicitly states 'If `candidate_features` is empty → zero-fill (correct, feature not provided)'. This fact is already captured in existing memory.","fact":{"content":"When candidate_features is empty, the correct behavior is to zero-fill the array, indicating the feature was not provided","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing candidate [4] already contains this exact behavior pattern: 'If length matches `candidate_ids` → use as-is (correct, provided correctly)'. The new fact does not add new information beyond what's already documented in the memory system.","fact":{"content":"When the length of candidate_features matches the length of candidate_ids, the correct behavior is to use candidate_features as-is, indicating it was provided correctly","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: cee35774-9bf6-49a6-b456-8338acabdea7
memory_id: c05034bf-775c-453b-b3f9-f49009710d10
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:54:08.795Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:55:57.909Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:50:26.615Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:55:57.909Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The candidate_features parameter now returns an explicit error when provided with length mismatches instead of silently zero-filling","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Previously, candidate_features would silently zero-fill when input length mismatches occurred","type":"semantic","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The candidate_embeddings parameter already returns explicit length-mismatch errors when provided with mismatched lengths","type":"fact","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The candidate_texts parameter already returns explicit length-mismatch errors when provided with mismatched lengths","type":"fact","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Rejecting candidate_features with mismatched lengths via explicit error was chosen to bring consistency with how candidate_embeddings and candidate_texts handle the same scenario, rather than continuing to silently zero-fill","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"candidate_features","relationship":"now returns explicit error on","target":"length mismatch","confidence":0.95},{"source":"candidate_features","relationship":"previously did","target":"silent zero-fill","confidence":0.9},{"source":"candidate_features","relationship":"now aligned with behavior of","target":"candidate_embeddings","confidence":0.85},{"source":"candidate_features","relationship":"now aligned with behavior of","target":"candidate_texts","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 already comprehensively captures this behavior change: 'If provided but length mismatches → return explicit error (fixed from silent zero-fill)' along with the rationale for consistency with candidate_embeddings/candidate_texts handling.","fact":{"content":"The candidate_features parameter now returns an explicit error when provided with length mismatches instead of silently zero-filling","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate #5 (c05034bf) already explicitly states the previous behavior: 'If provided but length mismatches → return explicit error (fixed from silent zero-fill)'. The new fact adds no new information; it simply reiterates the same old behavior that was already documented.","fact":{"content":"Previously, candidate_features would silently zero-fill when input length mismatches occurred","type":"semantic","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate 5 (c05034bf-775c-453b-b3f9-f49009710d10) already explicitly states that candidate_embeddings returns explicit length-mismatch errors. The new fact restates what's already documented as context for the candidate_features fix.","fact":{"content":"The candidate_embeddings parameter already returns explicit length-mismatch errors when provided with mismatched lengths","type":"fact","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Existing memory [c05034bf...] already explicitly states that candidate_texts returns explicit length-mismatch errors, noting this as the benchmark behavior that candidate_features was updated to match. The new fact confirms what's already documented.","fact":{"content":"The candidate_texts parameter already returns explicit length-mismatch errors when provided with mismatched lengths","type":"fact","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures the core content: rejecting mismatched lengths via explicit error for consistency with candidate_embeddings and candidate_texts (vs silent zero-fill). The new fact rephrases this as a rationale/design choice, but the substance is already documented.","fact":{"content":"Rejecting candidate_features with mismatched lengths via explicit error was chosen to bring consistency with how candidate_embeddings and candidate_texts handle the same scenario, rather than continuing to silently zero-fill","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: a9b237c6-b100-486f-8da4-934ef940a8fb
memory_id: ccdd0441-ea33-4604-889d-8090caceaa2d
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T15:55:59.910Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T15:57:15.073Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T15:50:26.627Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T15:57:15.073Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A code change was applied using the Edit tool","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The code change preserves empty-features fallback behavior to maintain backward compatibility","type":"fact","confidence":0.8},{"content":"The code change fixes a dangerous silent-corruption case that was causing data loss or corruption","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"Edit tool","relationship":"used to apply","target":"code change","confidence":0.95},{"source":"code change","relationship":"preserves","target":"empty-features fallback behavior","confidence":0.8},{"source":"code change","relationship":"fixes","target":"silent-corruption issue","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"delete","targetMemoryId":"841d2384-d955-44a4-a2a4-5ebc1e43645b","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact (code change via Edit tool, 0.95 confidence) directly contradicts candidate 1 which claims no code changes were made. Candidate 3 already fully captures the new fact with additional context about the change's purpose.","fact":{"content":"A code change was applied using the Edit tool","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"No code changes or architectural decisions were made during this session."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this fact with greater specificity, noting the change was applied via Edit tool and preserves empty-features fallback behavior while fixing silent-corruption. New fact is a subset of existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The code change preserves empty-features fallback behavior to maintain backward compatibility","type":"fact","confidence":0.8}},{"action":"delete","targetMemoryId":"841d2384-d955-44a4-a2a4-5ebc1e43645b","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [1] explicitly states 'No code changes... were made during this session', which directly contradicts the new fact that a code change was made. Candidate [3] already captures the specific details of this fix.","fact":{"content":"The code change fixes a dangerous silent-corruption case that was causing data loss or corruption","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"No code changes or architectural decisions were made during this session."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":1,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 571cb6a0-1976-4f7a-8368-ef92298e4c33
memory_id: d704f43f-caee-4fa9-8e07-31f4eaa1645f
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:13:01.726Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:13:39.064Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:12:59.754Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:13:39.064Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The Onboarding Overhaul Plan covers Signet development roadmap versions 2.1 through 2.4","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Nicholai received and reviewed a comprehensive plan for the next priority tier of Signet development","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"received and reviewed","target":"comprehensive development plan for next priority tier","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Onboarding Overhaul Plan","relationship":"covers","target":"Signet roadmap versions 2.1-2.4","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already contains this exact fact: 'Onboarding Overhaul Plan (Roadmap 2.1-2.4)'. The new fact is fully covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The Onboarding Overhaul Plan covers Signet development roadmap versions 2.1 through 2.4","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This fact is already covered by candidate [5] which has the identical content about Nicholai reviewing a comprehensive plan for the next priority tier of Signet development (Onboarding Overhaul Plan, Roadmap 2.1-2.4)","fact":{"content":"Nicholai received and reviewed a comprehensive plan for the next priority tier of Signet development","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: baee5bb6-8f40-43cb-a5d7-ae711b15a91d
memory_id: 401f623a-8a44-446f-9ee0-776a65a3ce31
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:13:41.066Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:15:48.348Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:12:59.766Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:15:48.348Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The onboarding overhaul involves restructuring five files across the template and skills system","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The onboarding overhaul adds missing step indicators to the template structure","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The onboarding overhaul adds an outline to the template","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The onboarding overhaul eliminates timezone redundancy from the template configuration","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The onboarding overhaul adds persona guidance to help users understand agent personality during setup","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The onboarding overhaul clarifies the relationship between manual memory saves (/remember and /recall commands) and the automatic memory pipeline","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"onboarding overhaul","relationship":"restructures","target":"template and skills system files","confidence":0.85},{"source":"onboarding overhaul","relationship":"adds","target":"step indicators","confidence":0.85},{"source":"onboarding overhaul","relationship":"adds","target":"outline","confidence":0.85},{"source":"onboarding overhaul","relationship":"eliminates","target":"timezone redundancy","confidence":0.85},{"source":"onboarding overhaul","relationship":"adds","target":"persona guidance","confidence":0.85},{"source":"/remember and /recall commands","relationship":"clarifies_relationship_with","target":"automatic memory pipeline","confidence":0.8}],"proposals":[{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"882b97dc-a05a-4e64-952e-21d9da393b67","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact specifies the scope of the main changes (five files across template and skills system). Candidate [5] already covers main changes; this adds the specific implementation detail about file count and distribution.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding overhaul involves restructuring five files across the template and skills system","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"**Main changes:** - Onboarding skill: major structural rewrite with 6-step outline shown upfront, guiding voice section (warm, patient tone framed as style guidance not roleplay), step indicators at each phase, timezone removal, relaxation cues at phase transitions, quick mode updated - Remember ski"},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this detail explicitly: 'step indicators at each phase' is listed as a main change in the onboarding skill restructuring. The new fact is a restatement of information already stored.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding overhaul adds missing step indicators to the template structure","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.82,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures this as part of the overhaul scope: 'fix structural issues (missing step indicators, no outline)'. The new fact is a specific confirmation of an implementation detail already acknowledged in the broader issue description.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding overhaul adds an outline to the template","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"401f623a-8a44-446f-9ee0-776a65a3ce31","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact confirms implementation of one of the stated goals. Candidate #3 already identifies 'eliminate timezone redundancy' as a target; merging reflects that this specific objective has been completed in the template configuration.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding overhaul eliminates timezone redundancy from the template configuration","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"The onboarding overhaul involves restructuring five files across the template and skills system to fix structural issues (missing step indicators, no outline), add persona guidance, eliminate timezone redundancy, and clarify the relationship between manual memory saves (/remember, /recall) and the automatic memory pipeline."},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"401f623a-8a44-446f-9ee0-776a65a3ce31","confidence":0.82,"reason":"New fact refines existing memory [5] by clarifying PURPOSE of persona guidance. Candidate [5] mentions 'add persona guidance' but lacks context; new fact explains it helps users understand agent personality during setup. Merge to create more complete picture of the overhaul's goal.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding overhaul adds persona guidance to help users understand agent personality during setup","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"The onboarding overhaul involves restructuring five files across the template and skills system to fix structural issues (missing step indicators, no outline), add persona guidance, eliminate timezone redundancy, and clarify the relationship between manual memory saves (/remember, /recall) and the automatic memory pipeline."},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"401f623a-8a44-446f-9ee0-776a65a3ce31","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact confirms that one of the overhaul's key objectives (clarifying manual vs. automatic memory) has been accomplished. Merging them creates a complete picture: the issue describes the overhaul's scope, the decision confirms the clarification was achieved.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding overhaul clarifies the relationship between manual memory saves (/remember and /recall commands) and the automatic memory pipeline","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"The onboarding overhaul involves restructuring five files across the template and skills system to fix structural issues (missing step indicators, no outline), add persona guidance, eliminate timezone redundancy, and clarify the relationship between manual memory saves (/remember, /recall) and the automatic memory pipeline."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":4,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 4dfd110f-6ff3-4a1a-b416-256fd5474d5c
memory_id: fc0f4a84-4134-4f9d-9bfc-4a86ec4dc994
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:15:50.368Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:17:00.526Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:12:59.778Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:17:00.526Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The current onboarding process lacks structure and guidance for users","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The /remember and /recall skills mislead users into manual workflows that duplicate the automatic memory pipeline","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Timezone configuration is redundantly requested in both onboarding templates and onboarding Phase 3","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"A plan has been identified to address four key problems in Signet onboarding: lack of structure and guidance, misleading /remember and /recall skills that duplicate automatic workflows, and redundant timezone requests","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"onboarding","relationship":"lacks","target":"structure and guidance","confidence":0.95},{"source":"/remember skill","relationship":"misleads users into","target":"manual workflows","confidence":0.9},{"source":"/recall skill","relationship":"misleads users into","target":"manual workflows","confidence":0.9},{"source":"manual workflows","relationship":"duplicate","target":"automatic memory pipeline","confidence":0.9},{"source":"onboarding templates","relationship":"redundantly request","target":"timezone","confidence":0.95},{"source":"onboarding Phase 3","relationship":"redundantly request","target":"timezone","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [4] (fc0f4a84...) already explicitly states 'current onboarding lacks structure and guidance' as part of the documented plan targets. The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The current onboarding process lacks structure and guidance for users","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This fact is already explicitly captured in candidate 5 (ID: fc0f4a84-4134-4f9d-9bfc-4a86ec4dc994), which lists 'the /remember and /recall skills mislead users into manual workflows that duplicate the automatic pipeline' as one of the four key problems being targeted. No new information to add.","fact":{"content":"The /remember and /recall skills mislead users into manual workflows that duplicate the automatic memory pipeline","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This fact is already documented in candidate [4], which explicitly mentions 'timezone is redundantly requested in both templates and onboarding Phase 3' as one of the key problems targeted by the onboarding overhaul plan.","fact":{"content":"Timezone configuration is redundantly requested in both onboarding templates and onboarding Phase 3","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","targetMemoryId":"fc0f4a84-4134-4f9d-9bfc-4a86ec4dc994","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures this exact information: the four key problems (structure/guidance, /remember /recall duplication, timezone redundancy) and the plan to address them. No new information to add.","fact":{"content":"A plan has been identified to address four key problems in Signet onboarding: lack of structure and guidance, misleading /remember and /recall skills that duplicate automatic workflows, and redundant timezone requests","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"The plan targets four key problems: current onboarding lacks structure and guidance, the /remember and /recall skills mislead users into manual workflows that duplicate the automatic pipeline, and timezone is redundantly requested in both templates and onboarding Phase 3."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 4875c198-5bb7-4e73-8960-91d03941f542
memory_id: 882b97dc-a05a-4e64-952e-21d9da393b67
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:17:02.527Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:17:28.212Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:12:59.791Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:17:28.212Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The onboarding system overhaul involves restructuring five files distributed across the template and skills system","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"onboarding overhaul","relationship":"involves","target":"restructuring five files","confidence":0.95},{"source":"onboarding overhaul","relationship":"affects","target":"template system","confidence":0.9},{"source":"onboarding overhaul","relationship":"affects","target":"skills system","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this decision: 'The onboarding overhaul involves restructuring five files across the template and skills system'. The new fact is substantially identical, just with minor wording variations ('system overhaul' vs 'overhaul', 'distributed across' vs 'across'). No merge or replacement needed.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding system overhaul involves restructuring five files distributed across the template and skills system","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: d925b0d0-7cfc-4830-9d2a-5dd2bc267db2
memory_id: f1fded13-e680-4854-860e-1d69414ed85d
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:17:30.214Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:18:53.323Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:12:59.806Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:18:53.323Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The Remember skill is hidden from users (user_invocable: false) to prevent manual saves from distorting the importance scoring system","type":"decision","confidence":0.7},{"content":"The automatic memory pipeline handles memory capture automatically, making manual saves via Remember skill unnecessary and counterproductive to importance scoring","type":"rationale","confidence":0.7},{"content":"The Recall skill includes a disclaimer section clarifying that memory is automatically injected into context and explaining when /recall is most useful","type":"procedural","confidence":0.75},{"content":"The Recall skill disclaimer specifies that /recall is useful for targeted searches and debugging scenarios","type":"fact","confidence":0.75}],"entities":[{"source":"Remember skill","relationship":"hidden_from_users","target":"user interface","confidence":0.7},{"source":"automatic pipeline","relationship":"handles","target":"memory capture","confidence":0.75},{"source":"manual saves","relationship":"distorts","target":"importance scoring","confidence":0.7},{"source":"Recall skill","relationship":"includes","target":"disclaimer section","confidence":0.8},{"source":"/recall command","relationship":"useful_for","target":"targeted searches and debugging","confidence":0.8}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"The core concept—Remember skill hidden from users to prevent manual saves from distorting importance scoring—is already captured in candidate [1], though that entry appears truncated/garbled. The new fact restates the same principle clearly.","fact":{"content":"The Remember skill is hidden from users (user_invocable: false) to prevent manual saves from distorting the importance scoring system","type":"decision","confidence":0.7}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"f1fded13-e680-4854-860e-1d69414ed85d","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate [5] already articulates the same principle: automatic pipeline handles capture and manual saves distort importance scoring. New fact provides clearer rationale for the design decision to hide the Remember skill. Merge to strengthen the principle statement.","fact":{"content":"The automatic memory pipeline handles memory capture automatically, making manual saves via Remember skill unnecessary and counterproductive to importance scoring","type":"rationale","confidence":0.7},"targetContent":"ll: hidden from users (user_invocable: false) with explanation that automatic pipeline handles capture and manual saves distort importance scoring - Recall skill: disclaimer section clarifying automatic injection and when /recall is useful (targeted searches, debugging) - User and Agent templates: o"},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 already captures this exact requirement: 'Recall skill: disclaimer section clarifying automatic injection and when /recall is useful (targeted searches, debugging)'. The new fact adds minimal additional detail and is redundant.","fact":{"content":"The Recall skill includes a disclaimer section clarifying that memory is automatically injected into context and explaining when /recall is most useful","type":"procedural","confidence":0.75}},{"action":"none","targetMemoryId":"f1fded13-e680-4854-860e-1d69414ed85d","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate 5 already captures this fact: it explicitly mentions 'Recall skill: disclaimer section clarifying automatic injection and when /recall is useful (targeted searches, debugging)'. The new fact adds no new information beyond what's already documented.","fact":{"content":"The Recall skill disclaimer specifies that /recall is useful for targeted searches and debugging scenarios","type":"fact","confidence":0.75},"targetContent":"ll: hidden from users (user_invocable: false) with explanation that automatic pipeline handles capture and manual saves distort importance scoring - Recall skill: disclaimer section clarifying automatic injection and when /recall is useful (targeted searches, debugging) - User and Agent templates: o"}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 3ccdda89-aa76-4c55-bdb1-5ce93771b309
memory_id: 1431d8d4-818d-4fcf-829a-1354400bb090
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:18:55.325Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:20:24.459Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:12:59.819Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:20:24.459Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Implementation order established: templates first (low-risk), then skills (additive disclaimers), then main onboarding rewrite","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Templates implementation is the first phase and characterized as low-risk","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Skills implementation is the second phase and involves additive disclaimers","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Main onboarding rewrite is the final implementation phase in the established sequence","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Templates phase was chosen first because it presents low implementation risk compared to skills and onboarding","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"templates","relationship":"implemented_before","target":"skills","confidence":0.95},{"source":"skills","relationship":"implemented_before","target":"onboarding rewrite","confidence":0.95},{"source":"templates","relationship":"characterized_as","target":"low-risk","confidence":0.9},{"source":"skills","relationship":"involves","target":"additive disclaimers","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"1431d8d4-818d-4fcf-829a-1354400bb090","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this implementation order but contains corrupted text. New fact provides a clean, well-articulated version of the same procedural decision: templates → skills → onboarding rewrite. Update to replace malformed content with the precise statement.","fact":{"content":"Implementation order established: templates first (low-risk), then skills (additive disclaimers), then main onboarding rewrite","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"ne-line timezone deletions each Implementation order established: templates first (low-risk), then skills (additive disclaimers), then main onboarding rewrite."},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"dce88f87-459d-4069-8341-a9ea6c0b4779","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact refines the implementation plan - specifies that Templates is the first phase and is low-risk. This adds specificity to the existing status note about plan approval and implementation beginning.","fact":{"content":"Templates implementation is the first phase and characterized as low-risk","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"## Status Plan approved and implementation beginning. All file structure, dependencies, and verification steps documented."},{"action":"add","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact specifies a distinct implementation phase (skills as phase 2 with additive disclaimers) not covered by existing 8-phase plans. The existing candidates reference implementation phases for different projects (predictive memory scorer, desktop app) without mentioning skills as phase 2 or additive disclaimers. Storing as new memory to avoid conflating separate implementation roadmaps.","fact":{"content":"Skills implementation is the second phase and involves additive disclaimers","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact adds sequencing information about implementation phases that's not covered by existing memories. Candidates 4-5 describe the problems and scope of the onboarding overhaul, but none explicitly state that the main onboarding rewrite is the final phase in an established sequence. This warrants a new memory to capture the implementation timeline.","fact":{"content":"Main onboarding rewrite is the final implementation phase in the established sequence","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact is architectural rationale for phase sequencing (why Templates first). Existing memories describe procedural details of each phase (what they cover) and workflow order, but not the decision-making rationale. This is unique strategic information worth preserving.","fact":{"content":"Templates phase was chosen first because it presents low implementation risk compared to skills and onboarding","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":3,"updated":2,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":3},"warnings":[]}


id: c67bb000-6fa6-4bd1-afaa-9d5ed39ec274
memory_id: 1bf1a171-3297-4d53-9395-18d4e3229ba5
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:20:26.461Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:21:04.849Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:12:59.837Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:21:04.849Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The verification process includes three main steps: rebuild, skill sync check, and interactive testing of all three skills","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Interactive testing of the three skills validates for: prompt injection warnings, outline visibility, step indicators, and timezone removal","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"verification process","relationship":"includes","target":"rebuild","confidence":0.9},{"source":"verification process","relationship":"includes","target":"skill sync check","confidence":0.9},{"source":"verification process","relationship":"includes","target":"interactive testing","confidence":0.9},{"source":"interactive testing","relationship":"validates","target":"prompt injection warnings","confidence":0.85},{"source":"interactive testing","relationship":"validates","target":"outline visibility","confidence":0.85},{"source":"interactive testing","relationship":"validates","target":"step indicators","confidence":0.85},{"source":"interactive testing","relationship":"validates","target":"timezone removal","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already contains this procedural detail with additional specificity (testing points: prompt injection warnings, outline visibility, step indicators, timezone removal). New fact is a simpler restatement of existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The verification process includes three main steps: rebuild, skill sync check, and interactive testing of all three skills","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 contains identical procedural information: interactive testing of all three skills for the same four validation points (prompt injection warnings, outline visibility, step indicators, timezone removal). The new fact adds no additional context.","fact":{"content":"Interactive testing of the three skills validates for: prompt injection warnings, outline visibility, step indicators, and timezone removal","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 9a83638d-4428-4ff6-888f-09199d8d2f89
memory_id: 137d61d6-ff0b-4a62-be2b-f5edcf2427fe
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:21:06.851Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:21:50.177Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:12:59.852Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:21:50.177Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The current plan follows completion of four high-priority (\"on fire\") roadmap items: defaults, npm gate, hook isolation, and non-interactive CLI","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Four completed roadmap items are marked as \"on fire\" status, indicating they were high priority or critical","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"current plan","relationship":"follows/depends on","target":"completion of four high-priority roadmap items","confidence":0.9},{"source":"current plan","relationship":"follows","target":"defaults roadmap item","confidence":0.9},{"source":"current plan","relationship":"follows","target":"npm gate roadmap item","confidence":0.9},{"source":"current plan","relationship":"follows","target":"hook isolation roadmap item","confidence":0.9},{"source":"current plan","relationship":"follows","target":"non-interactive CLI roadmap item","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [5] already contains this exact context about the four completed 'on fire' roadmap items (defaults, npm gate, hook isolation, non-interactive CLI). The new fact adds no novel information.","fact":{"content":"The current plan follows completion of four high-priority (\"on fire\") roadmap items: defaults, npm gate, hook isolation, and non-interactive CLI","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already explicitly states 'completion of four \"on fire\" roadmap items (defaults, npm gate, hook isolation, non-interactive CLI)'. The new fact conveys the same core information with less specificity. The interpretation about high priority/criticality is implicit in the 'on fire' designation already captured.","fact":{"content":"Four completed roadmap items are marked as \"on fire\" status, indicating they were high priority or critical","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 927f9fd1-aa1b-48cf-8bf1-b0a1a3912cb3
memory_id: 5612b7d7-7423-44a9-9a21-50458f199bd7
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:24:40.252Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:25:42.933Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:24:38.428Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:25:42.933Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Nicholai is implementing the onboarding overhaul covering roadmap sections 2.1-2.4","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The onboarding overhaul is the next priority tier after completing four 'on fire' items: defaults, npm gate, hook isolation, and non-interactive CLI","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Four prerequisite 'on fire' items (defaults, npm gate, hook isolation, non-interactive CLI) have been completed or are being completed before the onboarding overhaul begins","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"is implementing","target":"onboarding overhaul","confidence":0.95},{"source":"onboarding overhaul","relationship":"covers","target":"roadmap sections 2.1-2.4","confidence":0.95},{"source":"onboarding overhaul","relationship":"is next priority after","target":"defaults, npm gate, hook isolation, non-interactive CLI","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing candidate [4] already captures this fact: 'Nicholai began session to implement the onboarding overhaul (roadmap sections 2.1-2.4)'. The new fact is redundant and provides no additional detail beyond what's already stored.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai is implementing the onboarding overhaul covering roadmap sections 2.1-2.4","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5612b7d7...] already captures this exact decision: 'the onboarding overhaul (roadmap sections 2.1-2.4), the next priority tier after completing four \"on fire\" items (defaults, npm gate, hook isolation, non-interactive CLI).' The new fact adds no new information or nuance that changes the existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding overhaul is the next priority tier after completing four 'on fire' items: defaults, npm gate, hook isolation, and non-interactive CLI","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"137d61d6-ff0b-4a62-be2b-f5edcf2427fe","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact directly refines existing candidate [3]. Both cover the same prerequisite items before onboarding overhaul. New fact clarifies status as 'completed or being completed' (allows in-progress state), while existing says 'completion of' (past tense). Merge to capture current implementation status.","fact":{"content":"Four prerequisite 'on fire' items (defaults, npm gate, hook isolation, non-interactive CLI) have been completed or are being completed before the onboarding overhaul begins","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"Context: This plan follows completion of four \"on fire\" roadmap items (defaults, npm gate, hook isolation, non-interactive CLI)."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: ba72262a-f0e9-4957-a96c-02d17ed6aef6
memory_id: a3c35feb-e22f-40d1-af47-817c3365a8e2
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:25:44.934Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:28:08.803Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:24:38.451Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:28:08.803Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The `/onboarding` skill lacks step indicators that would guide users through the setup process","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The `/onboarding` skill lacks an upfront outline describing the initialization workflow","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The `/onboarding` skill contains redundant timezone-related questions that repeat unnecessarily","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The `/onboarding` skill provides misleading guidance about manual memory workflows","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The `remember` skill encourages users to manually capture memories, which duplicates automatic memory pipeline functionality","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The `recall` skill encourages users to manually capture memories, which duplicates automatic memory pipeline functionality","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Manual memory capture through `remember` and `recall` skills distorts importance scoring in the automatic memory pipeline","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The automatic memory pipeline should be the primary memory capture mechanism, not manual skill-based capture","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"/onboarding skill","relationship":"lacks","target":"step indicators","confidence":0.9},{"source":"/onboarding skill","relationship":"lacks","target":"upfront outline","confidence":0.9},{"source":"/onboarding skill","relationship":"contains","target":"redundant timezone questions","confidence":0.9},{"source":"/onboarding skill","relationship":"provides","target":"misleading guidance","confidence":0.9},{"source":"remember skill","relationship":"encourages","target":"manual memory capture","confidence":0.9},{"source":"recall skill","relationship":"encourages","target":"manual memory capture","confidence":0.9},{"source":"manual memory capture","relationship":"duplicates","target":"automatic memory pipeline","confidence":0.85},{"source":"manual memory capture","relationship":"distorts","target":"importance scoring","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] (a3c35feb-e22f-40d1-af47-817c3365a8e2) already documents this exact issue: 'no step indicators, no upfront outline' as part of the onboarding skill's structural problems. The new fact is already covered.","fact":{"content":"The `/onboarding` skill lacks step indicators that would guide users through the setup process","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This fact is already captured in candidate [5] (ID: a3c35feb-e22f-40d1-af47-817c3365a8e2), which explicitly lists 'no upfront outline' as one of the structural issues identified in the onboarding skill problem context.","fact":{"content":"The `/onboarding` skill lacks an upfront outline describing the initialization workflow","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This fact is already comprehensively covered in existing memories. ID fc0f4a84 explicitly states 'timezone is redundantly requested in both templates and onboarding Phase 3', and ID a3c35feb identifies 'redundant timezone questions' as a structural problem. The issue has been diagnosed and action items (IDs f4db8634, f89efe08) detail the fix and verification strategy.","fact":{"content":"The `/onboarding` skill contains redundant timezone-related questions that repeat unnecessarily","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate [5] already comprehensively describes this as a core problem: 'the /remember and /recall skills mislead users into manual workflows that duplicate the automatic pipeline' and mentions 'misleading guidance about manual memory workflows'. The new fact is a specific manifestation of a problem already well-characterized in the existing issue memory.","fact":{"content":"The `/onboarding` skill provides misleading guidance about manual memory workflows","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing memory a3c35feb covers this exact concern: 'The `remember` and `recall` skills encourage users to manually capture memories, which duplicates the automatic pipeline and distorts importance scoring.' Also superseded by f1fded13 which explains why manual saves are counterproductive. New fact is lower-confidence and narrower than existing record.","fact":{"content":"The `remember` skill encourages users to manually capture memories, which duplicates automatic memory pipeline functionality","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact issue: 'The `remember` and `recall` skills encourage users to manually capture memories, which duplicates the automatic pipeline and distorts importance scoring.' The new fact is a subset of this broader documented issue about manual memory skills duplicating automatic functionality.","fact":{"content":"The `recall` skill encourages users to manually capture memories, which duplicates automatic memory pipeline functionality","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate 5 (ID: a3c35feb) already captures this exact concern with identical language: 'The `remember` and `recall` skills... distorts importance scoring.' Candidate 4 (ID: f1fded13) also covers it from a slightly different angle ('counterproductive to importance scoring'). The new fact adds no new semantic content beyond what's already documented.","fact":{"content":"Manual memory capture through `remember` and `recall` skills distorts importance scoring in the automatic memory pipeline","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures this decision: 'making manual saves via Remember skill unnecessary and counterproductive to importance scoring.' The new fact is a restatement of the same principle—automatic pipeline as primary mechanism—already documented and actionable in existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The automatic memory pipeline should be the primary memory capture mechanism, not manual skill-based capture","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 4f08cea6-30eb-4a1f-b1be-d85137d7928b
memory_id: 0adbf04e-727c-44e8-9ec1-870228a73c3b
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:28:23.373Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:30:22.665Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:24:38.511Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:30:22.665Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The onboarding SKILL.md file underwent a major structural rewrite","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The onboarding SKILL.md frontmatter was expanded to describe skill scope (what it does and what it doesn't do)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"A 'What This Skill Does' transparency section was added to the onboarding SKILL.md","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"A 'Guiding Voice' tone guide was added to the onboarding SKILL.md to define interaction style","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The onboarding skill's 'Guiding Voice' tone guide emphasizes warm, patient, and refined communication style","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The onboarding skill's 'Guiding Voice' emphasizes 'we' language to create collaborative rapport with users","type":"preference","confidence":0.8},{"content":"The onboarding skill's 'Guiding Voice' avoids roleplay to maintain authenticity and directness","type":"decision","confidence":0.7}],"entities":[{"source":"onboarding SKILL.md","relationship":"underwent","target":"major structural rewrite","confidence":0.9},{"source":"onboarding SKILL.md","relationship":"added section","target":"'What This Skill Does' transparency section","confidence":0.85},{"source":"onboarding SKILL.md","relationship":"added section","target":"'Guiding Voice' tone guide","confidence":0.85},{"source":"'Guiding Voice' tone guide","relationship":"emphasizes","target":"'we' language","confidence":0.8},{"source":"'Guiding Voice' tone guide","relationship":"avoids","target":"roleplay","confidence":0.7}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 already documents the onboarding SKILL.md major structural rewrite with specific details (expanded frontmatter, new sections, guiding voice). The new fact is a summary of what's already captured more comprehensively in that existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding SKILL.md file underwent a major structural rewrite","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact detail: 'Expanded frontmatter describing scope (what it does/doesn't do)' as part of the onboarding SKILL.md structural rewrite. New fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding SKILL.md frontmatter was expanded to describe skill scope (what it does and what it doesn't do)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [0adbf04e-727c-44e8-9ec1-870228a73c3b] already explicitly documents the 'What This Skill Does' transparency section as part of the onboarding SKILL.md structural rewrite. New fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"A 'What This Skill Does' transparency section was added to the onboarding SKILL.md","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents the 'Guiding Voice' tone guide as part of the SKILL.md structural rewrite. New fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"A 'Guiding Voice' tone guide was added to the onboarding SKILL.md to define interaction style","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"590c9616-21e3-40d8-8d66-88ac9ee83597","confidence":0.82,"reason":"Candidate [5] already discusses tone guidance as a design decision. The new fact adds specific detail about what that tone guidance emphasizes (warm, patient, refined). Merging enhances the existing design decision entry with concrete tone characteristics.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding skill's 'Guiding Voice' tone guide emphasizes warm, patient, and refined communication style","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"### Key Design Decisions - Persona guidance framed as tone guidance (\"adopt a warm tone\") rather than character roleplay to avoid triggering host agent safety heuristics - \"Black wall gateway\" aesthetic conveyed through quiet confidence rather than cyberpunk keywords - Transparency declarations satisfy safety requirements without separate \"trust me\" blocks - Remember skill fully hidden; recall remains user-accessible since it's read-only and useful for debugging"},{"action":"add","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact documents a specific 'Guiding Voice' design principle ('we' language for rapport) that complements but is distinct from existing memories about conversational interaction and collaborative approach. This concrete stylistic technique deserves its own memory entry for implementers and future onboarding work.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding skill's 'Guiding Voice' emphasizes 'we' language to create collaborative rapport with users","type":"preference","confidence":0.8}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.7,"reason":"New design principle for onboarding's guiding voice (authenticity via non-roleplay) is distinct from existing memory about onboarding problems/phases. Worth capturing as guidance for future implementation refinements.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding skill's 'Guiding Voice' avoids roleplay to maintain authenticity and directness","type":"decision","confidence":0.7}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":2,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":2},"warnings":[]}


id: 8186d6c8-fe19-470b-b405-e6f1c4030ba7
memory_id: 80fe86bc-ebee-45c6-a2f5-3c3cd4758bef
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:30:24.667Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:31:46.880Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:24:38.525Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:31:46.880Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"An interview workflow includes a 'Starting the Interview' section with a full 6-step outline before questions begin","type":"procedural","confidence":0.8},{"content":"Step indicators are positioned at each phase transition in the interview workflow","type":"procedural","confidence":0.8},{"content":"Relaxation cues with text like 'we can revisit anytime' are placed at the end of interview phases","type":"procedural","confidence":0.8},{"content":"A timezone question was removed from Phase 3 of the interview workflow","type":"decision","confidence":0.75},{"content":"Quick Mode functionality was updated (details truncated in source material)","type":"decision","confidence":0.6}],"entities":[{"source":"interview workflow","relationship":"contains","target":"6-step outline","confidence":0.8},{"source":"phase transitions","relationship":"have","target":"step indicators","confidence":0.8},{"source":"phase ends","relationship":"include","target":"relaxation cues","confidence":0.8},{"source":"Phase 3","relationship":"had_removed","target":"timezone question","confidence":0.75}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already explicitly documents the 'Starting the Interview' section with full 6-step outline before questions, making this fact redundant","fact":{"content":"An interview workflow includes a 'Starting the Interview' section with a full 6-step outline before questions begin","type":"procedural","confidence":0.8}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate [4] already explicitly mentions 'Step indicators at each phase transition' as part of the onboarding structure implementation. The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Step indicators are positioned at each phase transition in the interview workflow","type":"procedural","confidence":0.8}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [3] already documents this exact procedural detail: 'Relaxation cues at phase ends (\"we can revisit anytime\")'. The new fact adds no new information beyond what's already captured in the onboarding skill changes.","fact":{"content":"Relaxation cues with text like 'we can revisit anytime' are placed at the end of interview phases","type":"procedural","confidence":0.8}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"f89efe08-59db-47a8-a4b9-27c812894364","confidence":0.88,"reason":"New fact confirms the verification step in candidate [5]. Candidate [5] is a verification strategy that includes 'confirm timezone removed from interview flow', and the new fact provides specific confirmation that this removal occurred in Phase 3. Merge by updating candidate to reflect completed verification.","fact":{"content":"A timezone question was removed from Phase 3 of the interview workflow","type":"decision","confidence":0.75},"targetContent":"### Verification Strategy After implementation: build packages, verify skill sync, test all three skills in Claude Code, confirm timezone removed from interview flow and templates."},{"action":"add","confidence":0.45,"reason":"New fact about Quick Mode functionality updates doesn't match any existing candidates. However, low confidence (0.6) combined with truncated details suggests limited utility; storing as-is for future context when complete information becomes available.","fact":{"content":"Quick Mode functionality was updated (details truncated in source material)","type":"decision","confidence":0.6}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":1,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: a15b0159-1068-4e31-879d-bdb78b895e75
memory_id: 95ed07af-8d12-4db6-91c5-f21abe86e469
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:31:48.882Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:32:19.277Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:24:38.544Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:32:19.277Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The text fragment suggests agent behavior guidelines should be followed rather than using memory entries 2 as an alternative reference","type":"semantic","confidence":0.3}],"entities":[{"source":"agent","relationship":"should_follow","target":"behavioral guidelines","confidence":0.3}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.65,"reason":"New fact reinforces existing rule in candidate [3] about following agent behavior guidelines instead of memory entries. Candidate [3] appears corrupted but captures the same principle. New fact is low confidence (0.3) and doesn't add substantive information beyond what's already established as a rule.","fact":{"content":"The text fragment suggests agent behavior guidelines should be followed rather than using memory entries 2 as an alternative reference","type":"semantic","confidence":0.3}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: a763aa04-a6da-4988-bbca-9c7f39ee7f91
memory_id: 7b5ea1d0-bc8c-418f-843c-3fdfb720e0fc
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:32:21.278Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:33:48.591Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:24:38.557Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:33:48.591Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The Remember skill supports a `user_invocable` configuration flag that can be set to false to hide the skill from users","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Setting `user_invocable: false` on the Remember skill prevents hook-based auto-remembering behavior","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Hook-based auto-remembering in the Remember skill approximately doubles token usage due to session auto-capture overhead","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Setting `user_invocable: false` on the Remember skill is recommended to prevent token usage doubling caused by hook-based auto-remembering","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The rationale for disabling `user_invocable` on Remember skill is to avoid doubling token costs from automatic hook-based memory capture that runs in the background","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"Remember skill","relationship":"has configuration property","target":"user_invocable","confidence":0.95},{"source":"user_invocable: false","relationship":"disables","target":"hook-based auto-remembering","confidence":0.95},{"source":"hook-based auto-remembering","relationship":"causes","target":"doubled token usage","confidence":0.85},{"source":"Remember skill","relationship":"can hide from users via","target":"user_invocable: false","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures this exact fact: 'Set `user_invocable: false` to hide from users'. The new fact adds no new information beyond what's already documented.","fact":{"content":"The Remember skill supports a `user_invocable` configuration flag that can be set to false to hide the skill from users","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already contains this exact fact: 'Set `user_invocable: false` to hide from users and prevent hook-based auto-remembering that doubles token usage'. The new fact is redundant.","fact":{"content":"Setting `user_invocable: false` on the Remember skill prevents hook-based auto-remembering behavior","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"7b5ea1d0-bc8c-418f-843c-3fdfb720e0fc","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate 5 already identifies that hook-based auto-remembering 'doubles token usage,' and this new fact provides the root cause mechanism (session auto-capture overhead). Merging them creates a more complete, well-supported memory.","fact":{"content":"Hook-based auto-remembering in the Remember skill approximately doubles token usage due to session auto-capture overhead","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"**Remember skill** — Set `user_invocable: false` to hide from users and prevent hook-based auto-remembering that doubles token usage 3."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 3 already contains this exact fact: 'Set user_invocable: false to hide from users and prevent hook-based auto-remembering that doubles token usage'. New fact is redundant.","fact":{"content":"Setting `user_invocable: false` on the Remember skill is recommended to prevent token usage doubling caused by hook-based auto-remembering","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"7b5ea1d0-bc8c-418f-843c-3fdfb720e0fc","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact provides the specific rationale (token cost doubling) for the existing fact's recommendation to disable user_invocable. They directly address the same configuration decision—merging them creates a more complete explanation of the Remember skill's `user_invocable: false` setting.","fact":{"content":"The rationale for disabling `user_invocable` on Remember skill is to avoid doubling token costs from automatic hook-based memory capture that runs in the background","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"**Remember skill** — Set `user_invocable: false` to hide from users and prevent hook-based auto-remembering that doubles token usage 3."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":2,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 2f8f0d56-d4b1-4752-b28a-d73811b5ce05
memory_id: f4db8634-5659-4b25-a9cb-b8e45d550960
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:33:50.610Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:34:58.766Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:24:38.568Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:34:58.766Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A disclaimer section should be added to the Recall skill documentation explaining that automatic injection of relevant memories occurs at session start","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The Recall skill disclaimer should explain when manual recall is appropriate, specifically for: targeted searches, old decisions, and debugging use cases","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Timezone information should be removed from line 13 of USER.md.template","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Timezone information should be removed from line 60 of AGENTS.md.template","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"Recall skill","relationship":"should include","target":"disclaimer section","confidence":0.95},{"source":"disclaimer section","relationship":"explains","target":"automatic memory injection at session start","confidence":0.95},{"source":"USER.md.template","relationship":"should remove","target":"timezone field at line 13","confidence":0.95},{"source":"AGENTS.md.template","relationship":"should remove","target":"timezone field at line 60","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [2] already captures this exact task as an issue item: 'Recall skill — Add disclaimer section explaining automatic injection at session start'. The new fact is the same procedural task, already in the memory system.","fact":{"content":"A disclaimer section should be added to the Recall skill documentation explaining that automatic injection of relevant memories occurs at session start","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidates 4 and 5 (both labeled as issues) already explicitly specify this exact content: 'Add disclaimer section explaining automatic injection at session start and when manual recall is appropriate (targeted searches, old decisions, debugging)'. The new fact restates the same guidance in slightly different wording and adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The Recall skill disclaimer should explain when manual recall is appropriate, specifically for: targeted searches, old decisions, and debugging use cases","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing candidate #5 already captures this as an issue item: 'USER.md.template — Remove timezone from line 13'. The new fact is already covered by the existing procedural list.","fact":{"content":"Timezone information should be removed from line 13 of USER.md.template","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already covered by candidate [5] (ID: f4db8634-5659-4b25-a9cb-b8e45d550960), which explicitly lists 'AGENTS.md.template — Remove timezone from line 60' as task item 5","fact":{"content":"Timezone information should be removed from line 60 of AGENTS.md.template","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 931c605e-a7d1-499a-a95c-752a85a02564
memory_id: 590c9616-21e3-40d8-8d66-88ac9ee83597
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:35:00.768Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:36:10.664Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:24:38.585Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:36:10.664Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The onboarding skill includes a 'Guiding Voice' tone guide that defines communication standards","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The 'Guiding Voice' tone guide in the onboarding skill emphasizes warm communication style","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The 'Guiding Voice' tone guide in the onboarding skill emphasizes patient communication style","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The 'Guiding Voice' tone guide in the onboarding skill emphasizes refined communication style","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"onboarding skill","relationship":"has","target":"Guiding Voice tone guide","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Guiding Voice","relationship":"emphasizes","target":"warm communication","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Guiding Voice","relationship":"emphasizes","target":"patient communication","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Guiding Voice","relationship":"emphasizes","target":"refined communication","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [3] already establishes the existence of the 'Guiding Voice' tone guide and its communication standards (warm, patient, refined). Candidates [4] and [5] add further specifics. The new fact is a broader umbrella statement already covered by these existing memories.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding skill includes a 'Guiding Voice' tone guide that defines communication standards","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [3] already captures this information with additional detail: 'The onboarding skill's Guiding Voice tone guide emphasizes warm, patient, and refined communication style.' The new fact about warm communication is subsumed by the existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The 'Guiding Voice' tone guide in the onboarding skill emphasizes warm communication style","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [3] already captures this fact: explicitly states the tone guide emphasizes 'patient' communication style as part of the 'warm, patient, and refined' description. New fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The 'Guiding Voice' tone guide in the onboarding skill emphasizes patient communication style","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [3] already captures this fact: 'The onboarding skill's Guiding Voice tone guide emphasizes warm, patient, and refined communication style.' The new fact about refined communication style is already explicitly covered.","fact":{"content":"The 'Guiding Voice' tone guide in the onboarding skill emphasizes refined communication style","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 629b6163-7ede-4690-b811-658256b22eda
memory_id: f89efe08-59db-47a8-a4b9-27c812894364
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:36:12.666Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:36:42.195Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:24:38.601Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:36:42.195Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A timezone question was removed from Phase 3 of the interview workflow","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"timezone question","relationship":"was removed from","target":"Phase 3 of interview workflow","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Phase 3","relationship":"is part of","target":"interview workflow","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] (ID: f89efe08-59db-47a8-a4b9-27c812894364) contains the identical fact: 'A timezone question was removed from Phase 3 of the interview workflow'. No new information to add or update.","fact":{"content":"A timezone question was removed from Phase 3 of the interview workflow","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 88e698ed-f444-4daf-a3a9-658424fe5a75
memory_id: 34cc6dd5-39b3-4cfc-8d0b-36157047b317
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T16:58:14.690Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T16:59:24.592Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T16:58:13.634Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T16:59:24.592Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A user requested technical assistance with connecting to their Tailnet for remote work purposes","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The user's remote work context was at a coffee shop","type":"fact","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The session was initiated with a user query and screenshot attachment, but no implementation work was completed","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The session purpose involved Tailscale connectivity setup and troubleshooting","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"User","relationship":"requested_assistance_with","target":"Tailnet connectivity setup","confidence":0.85},{"source":"Session","relationship":"includes","target":"screenshot attachment","confidence":0.9},{"source":"User","relationship":"working_context","target":"coffee shop (remote)","confidence":0.85},{"source":"Session","relationship":"status","target":"incomplete/not_started","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact is already covered by candidate [5] (Tailnet Connectivity Setup Request). The existing memory captures the same information - user requesting Tailnet connectivity assistance for remote work - with additional context (coffee shop location, no implementation completed). No new information to store.","fact":{"content":"A user requested technical assistance with connecting to their Tailnet for remote work purposes","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate #5 (34cc6dd5-39b3-4cfc-8d0b-36157047b317) already captures this information explicitly: 'User requested assistance with connecting to their Tailnet for remote work at a coffee shop.' The new fact adds no additional context.","fact":{"content":"The user's remote work context was at a coffee shop","type":"fact","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures the key details: session initiated with user query and screenshot attachment, no implementation work completed. The new fact is a generic restatement of information already in memory.","fact":{"content":"The session was initiated with a user query and screenshot attachment, but no implementation work was completed","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents Tailscale/Tailnet connectivity setup and troubleshooting as a session topic with additional context (user scenario, coffee shop remote work, screenshot attachment). New fact is subsumed by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The session purpose involved Tailscale connectivity setup and troubleshooting","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 8b52856f-333a-4e83-baaa-7a0a12408817
memory_id: 423740f0-a713-4c01-8e25-f5d7347ac632
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T17:46:26.011Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:17.039Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T17:46:25.031Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:17.039Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Signet initializes development sessions via a hook system that automatically loads project context","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The signetai monorepo is actively developed in Claude Code","type":"fact","confidence":0.8}],"entities":[{"source":"Signet","relationship":"initializes sessions via","target":"hook system","confidence":0.85},{"source":"signetai monorepo","relationship":"developed in","target":"Claude Code","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"9f89b2e8-5e4f-4ba6-9d15-af30e3038a03","confidence":0.8,"reason":"New fact is a general architectural principle about Signet's hook system for session initialization. Candidate 1 describes the same pattern but scoped to Claude Code specifically. Merging them into a broader statement about Signet's session initialization architecture avoids duplication while preserving both the general principle and the Claude Code-specific implementation detail.","fact":{"content":"Signet initializes development sessions via a hook system that automatically loads project context","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"Claude Code sessions are initialized via a SessionStart hook that automatically loads the memory system and agent identity configuration"},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate [4] already establishes that Nicholai uses Claude Code as the development environment for signetai. The new fact restates this relationship without adding substantive new information about development practices, tooling, or project-specific context.","fact":{"content":"The signetai monorepo is actively developed in Claude Code","type":"fact","confidence":0.8}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: e8d3a79b-5d6f-4d56-b8ef-918a5dc73272
memory_id: 27a76ca5-4acf-4043-96ed-7e2430663918
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:19.041Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T17:48:11.574Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:05.113Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T17:48:11.574Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Nicholai requested Linux system tray/menu bar support for Signet","type":"preference","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Nicholai has expressed a strong preference for Linux system tray/menu bar integration with Signet","type":"preference","confidence":0.95},{"content":"An investigation of the Signet codebase was conducted to assess the implementation effort required for Linux system tray/menu bar support","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"requested","target":"Linux system tray/menu bar support for Signet","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Nicholai","relationship":"strongly prefers","target":"Linux system tray/menu bar integration","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"lacks","target":"Linux system tray/menu bar support","confidence":0.85},{"source":"Investigation","relationship":"targeted","target":"Signet codebase implementation effort assessment","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Existing candidate [4] (ID: 27a76ca5-4acf-4043-96ed-7e2430663918) already captures this preference: 'Nicholai requested Linux system tray/menu bar support for Signet, expressing strong preference for this feature.' The new fact is duplicate/redundant.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai requested Linux system tray/menu bar support for Signet","type":"preference","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [3] (ID: 27a76ca5...) already captures this preference: 'Nicholai requested Linux system tray/menu bar support for Signet, expressing strong preference for this feature.' The new fact is redundant and adds no additional detail.","fact":{"content":"Nicholai has expressed a strong preference for Linux system tray/menu bar integration with Signet","type":"preference","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [3] already captures the investigation activity with fuller context: it documents both Nicholai's request for Linux system tray support AND the assistant's investigation to assess implementation effort. The new fact only describes the investigation component, which is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"An investigation of the Signet codebase was conducted to assess the implementation effort required for Linux system tray/menu bar support","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 71f32ffb-ead3-4b00-ab52-bc0b19b0b3a0
memory_id: 03b1276e-ed67-4ddb-9f2e-880cfee21264
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T17:48:13.575Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T17:49:03.922Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:05.125Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T17:49:03.922Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The Signet monorepo contains a packages/tray/ package implementing a Tauri-based desktop application","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The packages/tray/ directory includes Rust components located at src-tauri/src/","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The packages/tray/ directory includes TypeScript components located at src-ts/","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"packages/tray/","relationship":"uses","target":"Tauri","confidence":0.95},{"source":"packages/tray/","relationship":"contains","target":"Rust components","confidence":0.95},{"source":"packages/tray/","relationship":"contains","target":"TypeScript components","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already covered by candidate [4], which specifically documents that packages/tray/ exists with Tauri-based implementation (both Rust and TypeScript components). Candidate [5] further details the package structure. No new information to capture.","fact":{"content":"The Signet monorepo contains a packages/tray/ package implementing a Tauri-based desktop application","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 4 already covers this fact: it explicitly states the `packages/tray/` package includes Rust components at `src-tauri/src/`. The new fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The packages/tray/ directory includes Rust components located at src-tauri/src/","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already explicitly documents that the packages/tray/ package includes TypeScript components at src-ts/. The new fact is redundant and already captured.","fact":{"content":"The packages/tray/ directory includes TypeScript components located at src-ts/","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: cc2d9f2a-742b-4e78-bdde-1db38182362d
memory_id: 29a650dd-b416-44f6-92b9-a38198cf3033
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T17:49:05.924Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T17:50:18.680Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:05.136Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T17:50:18.680Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The tray package contains platform-specific code located at `platform/autostart.rs`","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The tray package includes a commands layer implemented in `commands.rs`","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The tray package defines menu structures in `menu.ts`","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The tray package uses Tauri configuration from `tauri.conf.json`","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Documentation for the tray package exists at `docs/TRAY.md`","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"tray package","relationship":"contains","target":"platform/autostart.rs","confidence":0.95},{"source":"tray package","relationship":"contains","target":"commands.rs","confidence":0.95},{"source":"tray package","relationship":"contains","target":"menu.ts","confidence":0.95},{"source":"tray package","relationship":"uses","target":"tauri.conf.json","confidence":0.95},{"source":"tray package","relationship":"documented in","target":"docs/TRAY.md","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate 5 already covers this fact in detail, explicitly mentioning platform-specific code including `platform/autostart.rs` as part of the tray package structure.","fact":{"content":"The tray package contains platform-specific code located at `platform/autostart.rs`","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] (ID: 29a650dd...) already comprehensively documents the tray package structure, explicitly mentioning 'commands layer (`commands.rs`)' as part of a complete inventory of tray package components. The new fact is redundant.","fact":{"content":"The tray package includes a commands layer implemented in `commands.rs`","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already documents that the tray package includes 'menu definitions (`menu.ts`)'. The new fact is already covered by this existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The tray package defines menu structures in `menu.ts`","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [29a650dd...] already documents that the tray package includes 'Tauri configuration (tauri.conf.json)'. New fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The tray package uses Tauri configuration from `tauri.conf.json`","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":1,"reason":"Candidate [5] already explicitly states that tray package documentation exists at `docs/TRAY.md` as part of a comprehensive summary. New fact is fully covered.","fact":{"content":"Documentation for the tray package exists at `docs/TRAY.md`","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 0a0d77a8-5dbc-4130-99db-ce949e6ca34e
memory_id: 694d90bb-6020-472f-8a46-b6099e6d9426
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T17:50:20.681Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T17:51:25.003Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:05.148Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T17:51:25.003Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The initial investigation into Linux implementation work was incomplete","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The assistant was gathering context on existing infrastructure to scope the Linux implementation work","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Gathering context on existing infrastructure is necessary to properly scope Linux implementation work","type":"rationale","confidence":0.8}],"entities":[{"source":"assistant","relationship":"gathering context on","target":"existing infrastructure","confidence":0.9},{"source":"assistant","relationship":"scoping","target":"Linux implementation work","confidence":0.85},{"source":"investigation","relationship":"status","target":"incomplete","confidence":0.9},{"source":"context gathering","relationship":"enables","target":"scoping work","confidence":0.8}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact fact: 'The initial investigation was incomplete—assistant was gathering context on existing infrastructure to scope the Linux implementation work.' The new fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The initial investigation into Linux implementation work was incomplete","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact describes gathering context for Linux implementation work - a new initiative not covered in existing memories. While procedurally similar to candidate [2] (general principle of discovery-first approach), this is specific to a new work stream that should be tracked separately.","fact":{"content":"The assistant was gathering context on existing infrastructure to scope the Linux implementation work","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate [3] already captures this principle as a procedural memory: 'Discovery and context-gathering work should precede implementation work to ensure proposals are well-informed and grounded in existing codebase patterns'. The new fact is a rationale that justifies the existing procedural rule and is already well-covered by it.","fact":{"content":"Gathering context on existing infrastructure is necessary to properly scope Linux implementation work","type":"rationale","confidence":0.8}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":1,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":1},"warnings":[]}


id: 46478cd5-aecd-4bc2-bb8d-081aefaa843d
memory_id: 119420e8-cdfc-446e-a5dd-1a840669ded9
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T17:51:27.005Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T17:52:07.457Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:52.361Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T17:52:07.457Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"An onboarding overhaul plan exists as part of Roadmap versions 2.1-2.4","type":"fact","confidence":0.7},{"content":"A session included a presentation of a comprehensive implementation plan for the onboarding overhaul","type":"procedural","confidence":0.6}],"entities":[{"source":"Onboarding Overhaul","relationship":"part of","target":"Roadmap 2.1-2.4","confidence":0.7},{"source":"Session","relationship":"presented","target":"Onboarding Overhaul implementation plan","confidence":0.6}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"The new fact is already covered by memory ID 119420e8-cdfc-446e-a5dd-1a840669ded9 which explicitly states 'The onboarding Overhaul Plan (Roadmap 2.1-2.4)'. Memory ID 5612b7d7 also confirms the same roadmap connection. No new information to add or update.","fact":{"content":"An onboarding overhaul plan exists as part of Roadmap versions 2.1-2.4","type":"fact","confidence":0.7}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] (ID: 119420e8-cdfc-446e-a5dd-1a840669ded9) already captures this fact exactly: 'Session started with presentation of a comprehensive implementation plan for the onboarding overhaul.' New fact is redundant.","fact":{"content":"A session included a presentation of a comprehensive implementation plan for the onboarding overhaul","type":"procedural","confidence":0.6}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: e847845b-497b-497f-ad91-c6323facf2c6
memory_id: c8f662f6-7066-4d34-a30c-7ee7441461f1
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T17:52:09.458Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T17:54:13.316Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:52.372Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T17:54:13.316Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The onboarding initiative addresses four foundational issues: (1) lack of structure with no step indicators or outline, (2) missing persona guidance, (3) redundant timezone questions, (4) misleading remember/recall skills that encourage manual workflows","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The onboarding process currently lacks step indicators or visual outline structure to guide users through setup","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The onboarding process currently lacks guidance on agent persona and identity configuration","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The onboarding process includes redundant timezone questions that repeat unnecessarily","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The remember and recall skills provide misleading guidance encouraging manual memory management workflows","type":"fact","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Signet implements an automatic memory pipeline that manages memory extraction and updates without requiring user intervention via remember/recall commands","type":"semantic","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Manual memory management workflows encouraged by remember/recall skill documentation conflict with Signet's automatic memory pipeline architecture design","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"onboarding initiative","relationship":"addresses","target":"lack of structure (no step indicators or outline)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"onboarding initiative","relationship":"addresses","target":"missing persona guidance","confidence":0.9},{"source":"onboarding initiative","relationship":"addresses","target":"redundant timezone questions","confidence":0.9},{"source":"onboarding initiative","relationship":"addresses","target":"misleading remember/recall skills","confidence":0.85},{"source":"remember/recall skills","relationship":"encourage","target":"manual memory workflows","confidence":0.85},{"source":"manual memory workflows","relationship":"conflict with","target":"automatic memory pipeline","confidence":0.85},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"implements","target":"automatic memory pipeline","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact information with slightly more detail (mentions conflict with automatic pipeline). The new fact is a restatement of the same four foundational issues without adding new content.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding initiative addresses four foundational issues: (1) lack of structure with no step indicators or outline, (2) missing persona guidance, (3) redundant timezone questions, (4) misleading remember/recall skills that encourage manual workflows","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing candidates [3] and [5] already explicitly document this issue: candidate [3] states 'no step indicators, no upfront outline' and candidate [5] mentions 'lack of structure (no step indicators or outline)' as part of the broader onboarding structural problems. The new fact adds no novel information.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding process currently lacks step indicators or visual outline structure to guide users through setup","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"fa3356db-f548-4c35-bf72-cbb15f50b663","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact identifies a gap in the current implementation of the onboarding skill's Agent Identity phase. Candidate 3 describes the intended design; merging reveals the discrepancy between design and actual guidance quality.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding process currently lacks guidance on agent persona and identity configuration","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"## Onboarding Skill Overview The onboarding skill walks users through four phases of agent personalization: 1. **Agent Identity (IDENTITY.md)** - Character definition including name, creature type, origin story, visual identity 2."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This fact is already captured in existing memories. Candidate 1 explicitly states 'timezone is redundantly requested in both templates and onboarding Phase 3', and candidates 2 & 4 both identify redundant timezone questions as a core problem. Candidates 3 & 5 document the fix already applied.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding process includes redundant timezone questions that repeat unnecessarily","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact is already comprehensively covered by existing memories: candidates [3] and [4] identify the exact problem (remember/recall providing misleading guidance that conflicts with automatic pipeline), and candidate [5] documents the implemented solution (hiding remember skill, adding recall disclaimer)","fact":{"content":"The remember and recall skills provide misleading guidance encouraging manual memory management workflows","type":"fact","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact concept: 'The automatic memory pipeline handles memory capture automatically, making manual saves via Remember skill unnecessary.' Candidate [1] also covers the automatic extraction as part of the comprehensive architecture. The new fact is a summary of what's already in memory.","fact":{"content":"Signet implements an automatic memory pipeline that manages memory extraction and updates without requiring user intervention via remember/recall commands","type":"semantic","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.88,"reason":"Candidate [3] already captures this rationale: manual saves via Remember skill are unnecessary and counterproductive to the automatic pipeline's importance scoring. The new fact states the same core conflict at a higher level of abstraction but adds no new semantic content beyond what's already documented.","fact":{"content":"Manual memory management workflows encouraged by remember/recall skill documentation conflict with Signet's automatic memory pipeline architecture design","type":"rationale","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 842d6ba7-cfd5-47b3-a5c6-4943f38563a4
memory_id: 86178630-969f-47e4-b29f-b0a10df68adc
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T17:54:15.318Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T17:55:08.542Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:52.382Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T17:55:08.542Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The plan spans five files total","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Three of the files in the plan are skill templates: onboarding, remember, and recall","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Two of the files in the plan are manifest templates: USER.md and AGENTS.md","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"plan","relationship":"includes","target":"onboarding (skill template)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"plan","relationship":"includes","target":"remember (skill template)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"plan","relationship":"includes","target":"recall (skill template)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"plan","relationship":"includes","target":"USER.md (manifest template)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"plan","relationship":"includes","target":"AGENTS.md (manifest template)","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [5] already covers this fact with specific details: 'The plan spans five files: three skill templates (onboarding, remember, recall) and two manifest templates (USER.md, AGENTS.md).' The new fact is a less-detailed restatement of the same information.","fact":{"content":"The plan spans five files total","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already documents that the plan includes 'three skill templates (onboarding, remember, recall)' alongside two manifest templates. New fact is a restatement of information already captured.","fact":{"content":"Three of the files in the plan are skill templates: onboarding, remember, and recall","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 3 already captures this exact information: 'The plan spans five files: three skill templates (onboarding, remember, recall) and two manifest templates (USER.md, AGENTS.md).' The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Two of the files in the plan are manifest templates: USER.md and AGENTS.md","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 4070ffbe-433e-43f6-a6e4-6f5c670c42da
memory_id: 2023d90e-7d49-4f74-bf88-8cb34e7c2095
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T17:55:10.555Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T17:56:34.331Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:52.393Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T17:56:34.331Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The onboarding skill underwent a rewrite with major structural changes","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The rewritten onboarding skill includes upfront outline declarations as a structural component","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The rewritten onboarding skill includes 6-step progress indicators to track user progression","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The onboarding skill's 'Guiding Voice' section replaces the previous 'Interview Philosophy' section","type":"decision","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The rewritten onboarding skill includes brief relaxation cues inserted between phases to reduce cognitive load","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"onboarding skill","relationship":"underwent","target":"structural rewrite","confidence":0.9},{"source":"onboarding skill","relationship":"includes","target":"outline declarations","confidence":0.85},{"source":"onboarding skill","relationship":"includes","target":"6-step progress indicators","confidence":0.85},{"source":"onboarding skill","relationship":"includes","target":"Guiding Voice section","confidence":0.85},{"source":"Guiding Voice section","relationship":"replaces","target":"Interview Philosophy","confidence":0.85},{"source":"onboarding skill","relationship":"includes","target":"relaxation cues between phases","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.88,"reason":"New fact is already comprehensively covered by candidates [3] and [5], which both document the onboarding skill rewrite with specific structural changes (outline declarations, progress indicators, Guiding Voice section, relaxation cues). The new fact adds no novel information.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding skill underwent a rewrite with major structural changes","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Existing candidate [5] already comprehensively covers upfront outline declarations as part of the onboarding skill rewrite, along with other structural changes (6-step progress indicators, Guiding Voice section, relaxation cues). New fact is redundant detail already captured.","fact":{"content":"The rewritten onboarding skill includes upfront outline declarations as a structural component","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Existing candidate [5] already documents '6-step progress indicators' as a core component of the onboarding rewrite. This fact is fully covered by the existing memory and adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The rewritten onboarding skill includes 6-step progress indicators to track user progression","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact information: 'Guiding Voice' section replaces 'Interview Philosophy' as part of the onboarding skill rewrite. New fact adds no additional detail.","fact":{"content":"The onboarding skill's 'Guiding Voice' section replaces the previous 'Interview Philosophy' section","type":"decision","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"2023d90e-7d49-4f74-bf88-8cb34e7c2095","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already documents relaxation cues between phases as part of the rewrite. New fact adds context about their purpose (reducing cognitive load), refining understanding of the design rationale.","fact":{"content":"The rewritten onboarding skill includes brief relaxation cues inserted between phases to reduce cognitive load","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"The onboarding skill rewrite includes major structural changes—adding upfront outline declarations, 6-step progress indicators, a \"Guiding Voice\" section to replace \"Interview Philosophy\", and brief relaxation cues between phases."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 0564c200-1a11-488a-acfd-156cc3aab13c
memory_id: f43e7f5e-7475-4212-b10e-6b77f52b1139
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T17:56:36.333Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T17:57:48.724Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:52.407Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T17:57:48.724Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The remember skill has user_invocable set to false, hiding it from the standard user-facing skills list","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The remember skill is hidden from users to discourage manual saves that would distort the automatic importance scoring system used by the memory pipeline","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The recall skill includes a disclaimer explaining that memories are automatically injected into session context at the start of each session","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The recall skill disclaimer explains when manual /recall usage is appropriate versus relying on automatic memory injection","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"remember skill","relationship":"has visibility configuration","target":"hidden (user_invocable: false)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"recall skill","relationship":"includes","target":"disclaimer about automatic injection","confidence":0.9},{"source":"manual saves","relationship":"distort","target":"importance scoring","confidence":0.9},{"source":"automatic memory injection","relationship":"occurs at","target":"session start","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact is already covered by candidate [5] which explicitly states 'The remember skill will be hidden from users (user_invocable: false)...' The new fact restates this same decision in more technical terms (referencing the standard skills list visibility mechanism). Candidate [3] also provides the rationale for this decision.","fact":{"content":"The remember skill has user_invocable set to false, hiding it from the standard user-facing skills list","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this fact verbatim: 'The remember skill will be hidden from users (user_invocable: false) to discourage manual saves that distort importance scoring.' New fact adds only minor clarification about 'automatic importance scoring system used by the memory pipeline' which is already implied.","fact":{"content":"The remember skill is hidden from users to discourage manual saves that would distort the automatic importance scoring system used by the memory pipeline","type":"rationale","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures this fact comprehensively: 'The recall skill gains a disclaimer explaining automatic injection at session start and when manual /recall is appropriate.' The new fact is a subset of existing memory.","fact":{"content":"The recall skill includes a disclaimer explaining that memories are automatically injected into session context at the start of each session","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this as a fact: 'The recall skill gains a disclaimer explaining automatic injection at session start and when manual /recall is appropriate.' The new fact elaborates on what that disclaimer covers but doesn't add materially new information beyond what's already recorded.","fact":{"content":"The recall skill disclaimer explains when manual /recall usage is appropriate versus relying on automatic memory injection","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: bd25d2d1-bf53-47c1-9c17-6ba1293228fc
memory_id: 01f5ff8c-818e-48cc-af24-5603ea1b0d06
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T17:57:50.725Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T17:59:29.281Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:52.419Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T17:59:29.281Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Timezone reference at USER.md line 13 is being deleted as a one-line template deletion","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Timezone reference at AGENTS.md line 60 is being deleted as a one-line template deletion","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Remember and recall skills are updated with additive disclaimers as the second step in the implementation sequence","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"A full onboarding skill rewrite is performed as the final step after template deletions and skill disclaimer updates","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The implementation sequence for timezone reference removal is ordered as: (1) template deletions (USER.md, AGENTS.md), (2) additive disclaimer updates to remember and recall skills, (3) full onboarding rewrite","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"USER.md","relationship":"has_timezone_reference_deleted_at","target":"line 13","confidence":0.95},{"source":"AGENTS.md","relationship":"has_timezone_reference_deleted_at","target":"line 60","confidence":0.95},{"source":"remember skill","relationship":"receives","target":"additive disclaimer","confidence":0.95},{"source":"recall skill","relationship":"receives","target":"additive disclaimer","confidence":0.95},{"source":"onboarding skill","relationship":"receives","target":"full rewrite","confidence":0.95},{"source":"template modifications","relationship":"precedes_in_sequence","target":"skill disclaimer updates","confidence":0.95},{"source":"skill disclaimer updates","relationship":"precedes_in_sequence","target":"onboarding rewrite","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this: 'Both timezone references are removed from templates (USER.md line 13, AGENTS.md line 60).' The new fact is a specific instance of the broader memory about template timezone removal.","fact":{"content":"Timezone reference at USER.md line 13 is being deleted as a one-line template deletion","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures that timezone references at AGENTS.md line 60 (and USER.md line 13) are removed from templates as one-line deletions, with implementation sequence specified","fact":{"content":"Timezone reference at AGENTS.md line 60 is being deleted as a one-line template deletion","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidates [2] and [3] already establish that skills implementation (second phase) involves additive disclaimers. New fact is redundant with existing procedural memories.","fact":{"content":"Remember and recall skills are updated with additive disclaimers as the second step in the implementation sequence","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [2] (ID: 1431d8d4) already documents this exact sequence: 'templates first, then skills (additive disclaimers), then main onboarding rewrite.' The new fact restates the same implementation order without adding new information. Candidate [3] also confirms onboarding rewrite as the final phase.","fact":{"content":"A full onboarding skill rewrite is performed as the final step after template deletions and skill disclaimer updates","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [01f5ff8c...] already captures the exact implementation sequence: templates first (one-line deletions), remember/recall skills (additive disclaimers), then full onboarding rewrite. The new fact adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"The implementation sequence for timezone reference removal is ordered as: (1) template deletions (USER.md, AGENTS.md), (2) additive disclaimer updates to remember and recall skills, (3) full onboarding rewrite","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: e835f6c6-07ea-4223-9012-af991abddaf4
memory_id: 02c0c21c-ed93-4277-83c2-290100612485
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T17:59:31.283Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T18:01:13.672Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T17:47:52.428Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T18:01:13.672Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Onboarding skill verification includes build confirmation as a prerequisite step","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Onboarding skill verification includes skill sync validation","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Onboarding skill verification includes testing via /onboarding invocation to validate functionality","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Testing via /onboarding invocation must confirm that no prompt injection warnings appear","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Testing via /onboarding invocation must confirm that outline rendering displays properly","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Testing via /onboarding invocation must confirm that timezone removal is applied correctly","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"onboarding verification","relationship":"includes","target":"build confirmation","confidence":0.9},{"source":"onboarding verification","relationship":"includes","target":"skill sync validation","confidence":0.9},{"source":"onboarding verification","relationship":"includes","target":"/onboarding invocation testing","confidence":0.9},{"source":"/onboarding invocation testing","relationship":"validates","target":"absence of prompt injection warnings","confidence":0.85},{"source":"/onboarding invocation testing","relationship":"validates","target":"outline rendering correctness","confidence":0.85},{"source":"/onboarding invocation testing","relationship":"validates","target":"timezone removal","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"02c0c21c-ed93-4277-83c2-290100612485","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact clarifies that build confirmation is a prerequisite step (must happen first) in onboarding skill verification. Candidate 5 already captures build confirmation as part of verification but doesn't explicitly emphasize the prerequisite/ordering aspect. Merging adds clarity about the required sequence.","fact":{"content":"Onboarding skill verification includes build confirmation as a prerequisite step","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},"targetContent":"Verification includes build confirmation, skill sync validation, and testing via /onboarding invocation to ensure no prompt injection warnings, proper outline rendering, and timezone removal."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.85,"reason":"Candidate #4 (1bf1a171-3297-4d53-9395-18d4e3229ba5) already captures this fact: it explicitly states 'skill sync check' is part of onboarding verification, alongside rebuild and interactive testing. The new fact is a subset of existing coverage.","fact":{"content":"Onboarding skill verification includes skill sync validation","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already comprehensively covers this: it explicitly mentions 'testing via /onboarding invocation' and includes specific validation goals (prompt injection warnings, outline rendering, timezone removal). The new fact adds no novel information.","fact":{"content":"Onboarding skill verification includes testing via /onboarding invocation to validate functionality","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate #5 (02c0c21c-ed93-4277-83c2-290100612485) already captures this exact requirement: 'testing via /onboarding invocation to ensure no prompt injection warnings' as part of verification checklist. New fact is redundant and less comprehensive.","fact":{"content":"Testing via /onboarding invocation must confirm that no prompt injection warnings appear","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Existing memory [5] (ID: 02c0c21c-ed93-4277-83c2-290100612485) already captures this procedural requirement: 'testing via /onboarding invocation to ensure... proper outline rendering.' The new fact is a specific detail already covered by the broader verification checklist.","fact":{"content":"Testing via /onboarding invocation must confirm that outline rendering displays properly","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate 02c0c21c already captures this requirement: 'Verification includes...testing via /onboarding invocation to ensure...timezone removal.' The new fact is a specific restatement of an existing broader verification requirement.","fact":{"content":"Testing via /onboarding invocation must confirm that timezone removal is applied correctly","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 2e794a79-7af3-425b-b737-8ace1fb0a25e
memory_id: 4101b68d-20cc-4592-a281-03e87ea522c9
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T18:10:01.901Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T18:11:29.961Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T18:10:01.247Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T18:11:29.961Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The data fetcher in the pm-kalshi crate was refactored to write trades directly to SQLite (historical.db) instead of CSV","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The pm-kalshi backtester was updated to load trade data from SQLite instead of CSV","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The historical.db database in pm-kalshi contains 3.5 million markets but has zero trades across all markets","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The data fetcher in pm-kalshi has not yet populated the historical.db database with trades, which is the root cause of the zero-trade state","type":"fact","confidence":0.9},{"content":"A migration plan is in progress to refactor the pm-kalshi data fetcher to write trades directly to SQLite (historical.db) to complete the backtester's transition from CSV to database-backed data loading","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"pm-kalshi data fetcher","relationship":"writes trades to","target":"historical.db (SQLite)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"pm-kalshi backtester","relationship":"loads trade data from","target":"historical.db (SQLite)","confidence":0.95},{"source":"historical.db","relationship":"contains","target":"3.5 million markets","confidence":0.95},{"source":"pm-kalshi data fetcher","relationship":"has not populated","target":"historical.db with trades","confidence":0.9},{"source":"data fetcher refactoring","relationship":"replaces","target":"CSV-based data writing","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"4101b68d-20cc-4592-a281-03e87ea522c9","confidence":0.92,"reason":"New fact confirms the DataFetcher refactoring plan (candidate [2]) was successfully executed. Candidate [2] describes the plan with unresolved state (3.5M markets with zero trades). New fact confirms the refactoring is complete. Should merge to reflect completion status while retaining context about the blockers still needing resolution.","fact":{"content":"The data fetcher in the pm-kalshi crate was refactored to write trades directly to SQLite (historical.db) instead of CSV","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"## DataFetcher SQLite Migration Plan Session began with a detailed plan to refactor the data fetcher in the pm-kalshi crate to write trades directly to SQLite (`historical.db`) instead of CSV. The backtester now loads from SQLite but the database has 3.5M markets with zero trades because the fetcher never populated it."},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [4] already captures that the backtester loads from SQLite instead of CSV. The new fact restates this but adds no new information beyond what's already documented in the DataFetcher SQLite Migration Plan memory.","fact":{"content":"The pm-kalshi backtester was updated to load trade data from SQLite instead of CSV","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 3 already captures this exact fact: 'the database has 3.5M markets with zero trades because the fetcher never populated it.' The new fact is a restatement of existing knowledge about the historical.db state.","fact":{"content":"The historical.db database in pm-kalshi contains 3.5 million markets but has zero trades across all markets","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [2] already captures this diagnosis: 'the database has 3.5M markets with zero trades because the fetcher never populated it.' The new fact is a restatement of the same root cause analysis.","fact":{"content":"The data fetcher in pm-kalshi has not yet populated the historical.db database with trades, which is the root cause of the zero-trade state","type":"fact","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate #4 already comprehensively covers the DataFetcher SQLite migration plan for pm-kalshi, including the problem statement (3.5M markets with zero trades), the goal (write trades directly to SQLite for historical.db), and the context. The new fact merely restates that the plan is 'in progress' without adding new details, scope changes, blockers, or implementation specifics that would warrant an update.","fact":{"content":"A migration plan is in progress to refactor the pm-kalshi data fetcher to write trades directly to SQLite (historical.db) to complete the backtester's transition from CSV to database-backed data loading","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: c8647d96-c1fb-47cb-b1e5-7f068e9e2fce
memory_id: 23e2592d-535a-43bb-9c68-f71863acba98
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T18:11:31.963Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T18:12:56.109Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T18:10:01.267Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T18:12:56.109Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The DataFetcher struct is being modified to add an Arc<SqliteStore> field to enable database-backed storage access","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The append_trades_csv() method in DataFetcher is being replaced with insert_trades_batch() that delegates to the store's batch insert method","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"CSV file operations are being removed from the fetch_range() method as part of migrating to database-backed storage","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The refactoring involves six coordinated changes to transition from CSV-based to SQLite database-backed trade data storage","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85},{"content":"The architectural change moves trade data persistence from CSV files to a relational database accessed via SqliteStore, enabling batch operations and eliminating file I/O overhead","type":"rationale","confidence":0.8}],"entities":[{"source":"DataFetcher struct","relationship":"adds field","target":"Arc<SqliteStore>","confidence":0.9},{"source":"append_trades_csv() method","relationship":"replaced by","target":"insert_trades_batch() method","confidence":0.9},{"source":"insert_trades_batch() method","relationship":"calls","target":"store batch insert method","confidence":0.9},{"source":"fetch_range() method","relationship":"removes","target":"CSV file operations","confidence":0.9},{"source":"refactoring plan","relationship":"transition to","target":"SQLite database-backed storage","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"add","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact is a specific implementation detail about DataFetcher struct modification for database access. No existing candidate covers this architectural change. Candidates address broader pipeline config restructuring, OpenClaw memory schemas, and general architecture, but not this specific storage layer enhancement.","fact":{"content":"The DataFetcher struct is being modified to add an Arc<SqliteStore> field to enable database-backed storage access","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [3] already captures this exact change as part of the detailed implementation strategy: 'Replace `append_trades_csv()` method with `insert_trades_batch()` that calls the store's batch insert method'. The new fact is a restatement of what's already documented.","fact":{"content":"The append_trades_csv() method in DataFetcher is being replaced with insert_trades_batch() that delegates to the store's batch insert method","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact documents a specific refactoring task (CSV removal from fetch_range() during database migration) that is distinct from existing candidates about DB access patterns, migrations registration, or CLI changes. Should be stored as a separate procedural/decision memory.","fact":{"content":"CSV file operations are being removed from the fetch_range() method as part of migrating to database-backed storage","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this refactoring in detail—same six coordinated changes for CSV-to-SQLite transition. The new fact is a high-level summary of existing memory content.","fact":{"content":"The refactoring involves six coordinated changes to transition from CSV-based to SQLite database-backed trade data storage","type":"procedural","confidence":0.85}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"4101b68d-20cc-4592-a281-03e87ea522c9","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact provides the rationale/justification for the decision already captured in candidate [3]. The existing memory records the decision (CSV → SQLite refactor) but lacks the architectural reasoning. Merging enriches the decision with context about why: batch operations and I/O overhead elimination.","fact":{"content":"The architectural change moves trade data persistence from CSV files to a relational database accessed via SqliteStore, enabling batch operations and eliminating file I/O overhead","type":"rationale","confidence":0.8},"targetContent":"The data fetcher in the pm-kalshi crate was refactored to write trades directly to SQLite (historical.db) instead of CSV"}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":2,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":2},"warnings":[]}


id: 7ec31e1d-aeb8-4c70-84be-b5b728240e4e
memory_id: c2cf64ca-e2c5-4b72-8293-63cb5ed2cedf
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T18:12:58.130Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T18:13:56.285Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T18:10:01.278Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T18:13:56.285Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The `get_available_data()` function should be updated to query the `historical_trades` table in a SQLite database instead of scanning files on disk","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"DataFetcher construction in both AppState and main.rs needs to be updated to create and share a SqliteStore instance for accessing historical.db","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"The application uses a SQLite database file named historical.db to store historical trades data","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85}],"entities":[{"source":"get_available_data()","relationship":"replaces","target":"file scanning with database queries","confidence":0.9},{"source":"get_available_data()","relationship":"queries","target":"historical_trades table","confidence":0.9},{"source":"DataFetcher","relationship":"uses","target":"SqliteStore","confidence":0.9},{"source":"AppState","relationship":"initializes","target":"SqliteStore","confidence":0.85},{"source":"main.rs","relationship":"initializes","target":"SqliteStore","confidence":0.85},{"source":"SqliteStore","relationship":"accesses","target":"historical.db","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"This decision is already captured in candidate [3], which explicitly states 'Update `get_available_data()` to query `historical_trades` table instead of scanning files'. The new fact is a restatement of the same architectural decision with no additional detail or refinement.","fact":{"content":"The `get_available_data()` function should be updated to query the `historical_trades` table in a SQLite database instead of scanning files on disk","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] already explicitly covers this procedural task: 'Update DataFetcher construction in AppState and main.rs to create and share a SqliteStore for historical.db'. The new fact is already documented in existing memory.","fact":{"content":"DataFetcher construction in both AppState and main.rs needs to be updated to create and share a SqliteStore instance for accessing historical.db","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Candidate [4] already covers this fact—it explicitly mentions 'create and share a SqliteStore for historical.db' as part of the technical implementation. The new fact is a simpler statement of what's already documented in the existing memory about the database file and its purpose.","fact":{"content":"The application uses a SQLite database file named historical.db to store historical trades data","type":"semantic","confidence":0.85}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 95a5e2f3-6776-482d-a086-dbc7787dc66a
memory_id: 8d54690a-2b70-4fee-92da-5928b6397f4b
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T18:13:58.288Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T18:15:00.229Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T18:10:01.290Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T18:15:00.229Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"The backtest handler is being updated to use a shared historical_store for database connections instead of opening a new connection for each request","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"The current backtest handler pattern opens a new database connection for each request","type":"fact","confidence":0.85},{"content":"Using a shared historical_store reduces connection overhead and resource consumption compared to per-request connection creation","type":"rationale","confidence":0.8}],"entities":[{"source":"backtest handler","relationship":"updated to use","target":"shared historical_store","confidence":0.95},{"source":"backtest handler","relationship":"previously used","target":"per-request database connections","confidence":0.85}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.98,"reason":"Candidate [5] (ID: 8d54690a-2b70-4fee-92da-5928b6397f4b) already captures this exact decision: updating the backtest handler to use a shared historical_store instead of per-request connections. The new fact is redundant.","fact":{"content":"The backtest handler is being updated to use a shared historical_store for database connections instead of opening a new connection for each request","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"8d54690a-2b70-4fee-92da-5928b6397f4b","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact describes the current problematic pattern that candidate 5 addresses as a fix. Merge them: state the problem (opens new connection per request) and solution (use shared historical_store) together for complete context.","fact":{"content":"The current backtest handler pattern opens a new database connection for each request","type":"fact","confidence":0.85},"targetContent":"Update backtest handler to use the shared historical_store instead of opening a new connection per request"},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"8d54690a-2b70-4fee-92da-5928b6397f4b","confidence":0.85,"reason":"New fact provides the design rationale for candidate 5's implementation pattern. Merging them creates a more complete memory that includes both the action and its justification (reduced connection overhead and resource consumption).","fact":{"content":"Using a shared historical_store reduces connection overhead and resource consumption compared to per-request connection creation","type":"rationale","confidence":0.8},"targetContent":"Update backtest handler to use the shared historical_store instead of opening a new connection per request"}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":2,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 15451d68-f25a-4775-a191-cfe67b6de889
memory_id: 83e1c490-7e02-4f1b-b5db-43c291309002
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T18:15:02.229Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T18:16:32.374Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T18:10:01.306Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T18:16:32.374Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Trade data tuples consist of five fields: timestamp (string/i64), ticker (string/i64), price (string/i64), volume (string/i64), and side (string/i64)","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Price values in trade tuples are stored as integer cents and must be divided by 100.0 to convert to decimal format","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Historical trades are processed in batches of 10,000 trades per batch size, reusing an existing batch size constant","type":"decision","confidence":0.9},{"content":"SqliteStore API provides insert_historical_trades_batch() method for inserting batches of historical trades","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"SqliteStore API provides count_historical_trades() method for counting stored historical trades","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Implementation requires source code modifications to four files: fetcher.rs, web/mod.rs, main.rs, and web/handlers.rs","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}],"entities":[{"source":"trade tuple","relationship":"has_fields","target":"timestamp, ticker, price, volume, side","confidence":0.95},{"source":"price field","relationship":"stored_as","target":"integer cents","confidence":0.95},{"source":"price conversion","relationship":"requires","target":"division by 100.0","confidence":0.95},{"source":"historical trades processing","relationship":"uses_batch_size","target":"10,000 trades","confidence":0.9},{"source":"SqliteStore","relationship":"has_method","target":"insert_historical_trades_batch()","confidence":0.95},{"source":"SqliteStore","relationship":"has_method","target":"count_historical_trades()","confidence":0.95},{"source":"implementation","relationship":"requires_modifications_to","target":"fetcher.rs","confidence":0.9},{"source":"implementation","relationship":"requires_modifications_to","target":"web/mod.rs","confidence":0.9},{"source":"implementation","relationship":"requires_modifications_to","target":"main.rs","confidence":0.9},{"source":"implementation","relationship":"requires_modifications_to","target":"web/handlers.rs","confidence":0.9}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [1] already documents the exact trade tuple format (timestamp, ticker, price, volume, side) as strings/i64. New fact is fully covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Trade data tuples consist of five fields: timestamp (string/i64), ticker (string/i64), price (string/i64), volume (string/i64), and side (string/i64)","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [3] already contains this exact detail: 'Price conversion: yes_price is in cents (integer), divide by 100.0 for decimal format.' The new fact is fully covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Price values in trade tuples are stored as integer cents and must be divided by 100.0 to convert to decimal format","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this fact verbatim: 'Batch size: 10,000 trades per batch (reusing existing batch size constant)'. The new fact is fully covered by existing memory.","fact":{"content":"Historical trades are processed in batches of 10,000 trades per batch size, reusing an existing batch size constant","type":"decision","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already documented in candidate [5] (Technical Details), which explicitly lists 'SqliteStore API methods: `insert_historical_trades_batch()` and `count_historical_trades()`'","fact":{"content":"SqliteStore API provides insert_historical_trades_batch() method for inserting batches of historical trades","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 5 already captures this detail in its Technical Details section, explicitly listing SqliteStore API methods: `insert_historical_trades_batch()` and `count_historical_trades()`. The new fact is redundant with existing memory.","fact":{"content":"SqliteStore API provides count_historical_trades() method for counting stored historical trades","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"add","confidence":0.88,"reason":"New fact specifies four Rust files requiring modification (fetcher.rs, web/mod.rs, main.rs, web/handlers.rs). Candidate [5] mentions 'five files' but is incomplete and appears to reference a different project context (TypeScript extractors vs. Rust implementation). New fact is precise, procedural, and deserves independent entry.","fact":{"content":"Implementation requires source code modifications to four files: fetcher.rs, web/mod.rs, main.rs, and web/handlers.rs","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":1,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":1},"warnings":[]}


id: 679ed304-e318-4423-a5bb-a4258be3569d
memory_id: 191b8682-b8d0-48f2-8a10-456ee0491ecb
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T18:16:34.376Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T18:17:14.487Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T18:10:01.323Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T18:17:14.487Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"A plan has been documented and is ready for implementation","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95},{"content":"No code changes have been made yet in the current session","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"plan","relationship":"is","target":"documented","confidence":0.95},{"source":"plan","relationship":"is_ready_for","target":"implementation","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [5] already captures this exact state: 'Plan documented and ready for implementation. No code changes have been made yet.' The new fact adds no additional detail or nuance beyond what's already recorded.","fact":{"content":"A plan has been documented and is ready for implementation","type":"procedural","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate 2 already contains the exact statement 'No code changes have been made yet' with additional context about the plan being documented and ready. The new fact is redundant and fully covered.","fact":{"content":"No code changes have been made yet in the current session","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: cf3f4333-a3e2-443c-95f1-c77f83987be6
memory_id: 9a2b39de-34eb-4d9c-a87f-c3a9c6d2a433
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T18:21:34.516Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T18:22:06.981Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T18:21:32.968Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T18:22:06.981Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"User sometimes initiates sessions in early morning hours (5:10 AM MT)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.4}],"entities":[{"source":"Session","relationship":"type","target":"greeting/casual conversation","confidence":0.7}],"proposals":[{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"9a2b39de-34eb-4d9c-a87f-c3a9c6d2a433","confidence":0.4,"reason":"Candidate [5] documents the 5:10 AM MT session start. New fact generalizes this into an emerging pattern. Merge to evolve the memory from single observation to behavioral pattern note.","fact":{"content":"User sometimes initiates sessions in early morning hours (5:10 AM MT)","type":"procedural","confidence":0.4},"targetContent":"## Session Overview Brief greeting session with no coding work. User checked in early morning (5:10 AM MT), exchanged casual conversation about the time and whether they were staying up late or waking up early. No tasks, code changes, or technical discussions occurred. Session ended without substantive work."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":0,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":1,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


id: 974ae56b-27df-4c08-9f58-30d2a97b5ce1
memory_id: 7e393409-3d7f-487d-8ed0-ca499565e880
job_type: extract
status: completed
leased_at: 2026-02-27T18:22:10.983Z
completed_at: 2026-02-27T18:23:43.490Z
created_at: 2026-02-27T18:22:10.758Z
updated_at: 2026-02-27T18:23:43.490Z
result:
  {"facts":[{"content":"Signet is a portable identity and memory layer designed to work across multiple AI coding platforms including Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Signet provides a stateful layer of functionality that Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw lack natively","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw are individually stateless tools that lose user context and memory between sessions","type":"fact","confidence":0.95},{"content":"Signet captures context from user sessions and reinjects it into the active frontend regardless of which AI coding platform is being used","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9},{"content":"Signet is designed as a complementary layer to existing AI coding tools rather than as a replacement for them","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}],"entities":[{"source":"Signet","relationship":"provides stateful layer to","target":"Claude Code","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"provides stateful layer to","target":"OpenCode","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"provides stateful layer to","target":"OpenClaw","confidence":0.95},{"source":"Signet","relationship":"captures and reinjects context across","target":"Claude Code, OpenCode, OpenClaw","confidence":0.9},{"source":"Claude Code","relationship":"is","target":"stateless tool","confidence":0.95},{"source":"OpenCode","relationship":"is","target":"stateless tool","confidence":0.95},{"source":"OpenClaw","relationship":"is","target":"stateless tool","confidence":0.95}],"proposals":[{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"New fact is already comprehensively covered by candidate [2], which explicitly describes Signet as a portable identity and memory layer working across Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw, including architectural context about stateless platforms and context reinjection.","fact":{"content":"Signet is a portable identity and memory layer designed to work across multiple AI coding platforms including Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw","type":"semantic","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.95,"reason":"Candidate [4] explicitly captures this same insight: 'Signet provides the stateful layer they all lack. Each tool is stateless and forgets between sessions; Signet captures context and reinjects it.' The new fact is a more concise restatement of the core architectural principle already documented in that memory.","fact":{"content":"Signet provides a stateful layer of functionality that Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw lack natively","type":"decision","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.92,"reason":"Existing memory [2] (Signet Architecture Overview) already explicitly states: 'Each tool is stateless and forgets between sessions; Signet captures context and reinjects it regardless of which frontend is used.' The new fact is a direct restatement of this existing memory and adds no new information.","fact":{"content":"Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw are individually stateless tools that lose user context and memory between sessions","type":"fact","confidence":0.95}},{"action":"none","confidence":0.9,"reason":"Candidate 7e393409... already captures this exact concept: 'Signet captures context and reinjects it regardless of which frontend is used.' The new fact is semantically duplicate with no additional detail or nuance beyond what's already stored.","fact":{"content":"Signet captures context from user sessions and reinjects it into the active frontend regardless of which AI coding platform is being used","type":"procedural","confidence":0.9}},{"action":"update","targetMemoryId":"7e393409-3d7f-487d-8ed0-ca499565e880","confidence":0.9,"reason":"New fact directly reinforces and clarifies existing memory about Signet's architecture. Current memory states 'Signet doesn't replace any of these tools—it provides the stateful layer they all lack.' New fact explicitly positions this as intentional complementary design rather than replacement. Merging strengthens the architectural positioning.","fact":{"content":"Signet is designed as a complementary layer to existing AI coding tools rather than as a replacement for them","type":"decision","confidence":0.95},"targetContent":"## Signet Architecture Overview Nicholai asked how Signet connects Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenClaw. The conversation focused on Signet's role as a portable identity and memory layer that works across multiple AI coding platforms. Key architectural insight: Signet doesn't replace any of these tools—it provides the stateful layer they all lack. Each tool is stateless and forgets between sessions; Signet captures context and reinjects it regardless of which frontend is used."}],"writeMode":"phase-c","writeStats":{"added":0,"updated":1,"deleted":0,"deduped":0,"skippedLowConfidence":0,"blockedDestructive":0,"reviewNeeded":0,"embeddingsAdded":0},"warnings":[]}


