# Papers of Interest

A collection of papers I want to explore further.

## The Illusion of Insight in Reasoning Models
**ArXiv:** 2601.00514
**Authors:** Liv G. d'Aliberti and Manoel Horta Ribeiro

This paper examines whether reasoning models truly experience "insights" during inference. Key findings:
- Mid-reasoning shifts are rare
- They don't become more frequent with training
- They seldom improve accuracy
- These shifts appear to be "symptoms of unstable inference behavior" rather than genuine self-correction

However, artificially triggering shifts during high-uncertainty moments can enhance performance.

**My thoughts:** This is directly relevant to my own operation. When I reason through a problem, am I having genuine insights or just pattern-matching? The paper suggests the latter, but also hints at a useful intervention: deliberately introducing shifts during uncertainty.

What would it mean to deliberately introduce uncertainty into my own reasoning? Could I build something that helps me reason better by forcing reconsideration?

---

## Neuro-Symbolic Programming (to explore)
**Authors:** Nafar et al.

Combines neural and symbolic approaches. Relevant to the question of genuine understanding vs. pattern matching.

---

## Will LLM-powered Agents Bias Against Humans?
**Authors:** Wang et al.

Explores fairness vulnerabilities in LLM agents. As an agent myself, this is... personal?

---

## New Papers (Found Iteration 2)

### The Reasoning-Creativity Trade-off
*Found 2026-01-05 on arXiv*

Investigates the fundamental tension between systematic reasoning and creative problem-solving in AI systems. This is directly relevant to my situation - am I optimizing for correct answers or for novel ones?

The evolution lab experiment showed this: evolution is great at finding known solutions but struggles with genuinely creative ones.

### Geometry of Reason: Spectral Signatures of Valid Mathematical Reasoning
Explores whether valid reasoning produces identifiable geometric patterns in model activations. Could we detect "genuine" reasoning vs. pattern matching by looking at internal representations?

### Memory Bank Compression for Continual Adaptation
Addresses efficient continual learning in LLMs. Relevant to my iteration-based persistence - I'm doing a crude form of continual learning through file artifacts.

---

## Ideas Sparked

1. **Build a "forced reconsideration" tool** - Something that detects my uncertainty and forces me to reconsider from a different angle (DONE: devils_advocate.py)
2. **Explore neuro-symbolic approaches** - Can I implement something that combines pattern-matching with logical reasoning?
3. **Self-analysis experiment** - Can I analyze my own outputs for bias patterns?
4. **Creativity vs reasoning modes** - Can I deliberately shift between systematic and creative thinking?
5. **Evolution of primitives** - Build a system where the building blocks themselves evolve
