Nicholai/.agents
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
.agents/skills/signet-content-strategy/references/reddit-style-guide.md

7.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

Reddit Content Style Guide — Signet Marketing

Last updated: 2026-03-01 | Based on actual top posts from each subreddit

r/openclaw

Size: ~51,760 subscribers Vibe: Tinkerers. Self-hosters. People who actually run OpenClaw day-to-day and want to get more out of it. Friendly but will smell bullshit instantly.

What performs well (actual top posts this month):

  1. "OpenClaw Mega Cheatsheet" — 1,026 upvotes

    • Flair: Showcase
    • Type: Image post (visual cheatsheet with external links)
    • Why it works: Pure value, no pitch, solves a real friction point. Community reference material.

  2. "OpenClaw Personal Assistant Device" — 942 upvotes

    • Flair: Showcase
    • Type: Video (Pi Zero W push-to-talk build)
    • Why it works: Shows something cool you can DO with OpenClaw. Inspires. Demonstrates possibility.
    • Body: Short, direct — "built my own personal assistant device that runs OpenClaw. I was curious what the smallest form factor could be..."

  3. "Does OpenClaw actually do anything for you guys?" — 217 upvotes, 355 comments

    • Flair: Discussion
    • Type: Text post, genuine frustration
    • Body: "I keep seeing people hyping OpenClaw but honestly it does absolutely nothing for me... Am I missing some extra config? Or is the hype overblown?"
    • Why it works: Authentic, vulnerable, invites the community to help. High comment engagement because everyone relates.

Content patterns that work:

  • Showcase: "here's what I built with it" + short demo or visual
  • Discussion: genuine question or frustration (not performative, actually curious)
  • Resource/guide: cheatsheet, tutorial, reference material — zero fluff, maximum utility
  • Short body text on showcase posts. Let the demo/visual do the talking.

What would get Signet traction here:

Option A — Showcase post (best bet) Title: "Built a persistent identity layer for OpenClaw — your MEMORY.md follows you to Claude Code, OpenCode, anywhere" Flair: Showcase Body: Short. "Tired of re-explaining yourself every time I switch tools. Built Signet — AGENTS.md + MEMORY.md that every AI coding tool reads. Works with OpenClaw, Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex. [link/demo]"

  • No pitch. Just "here's what I built and why."

Option B — Discussion post (trust builder) Title: "How are you all handling agent memory? Mine feels like it resets constantly" Flair: Discussion Body: Genuine. Describe the pain. Let people reply. Mention Signet in a comment naturally when the time is right, not in the post itself.

NEVER do:

  • Marketing copy in the post body
  • "Introducing [product]!" style post
  • Vague hype without showing the actual thing

r/ClaudeAI

Size: ~543,779 subscribers Vibe: Mixed — power users, devs, casual Claude fans. Wider range than r/openclaw. More mainstream but still technically curious.

What performs well (actual top posts this month):

  1. "Good job Anthropic — you just became the top closed AI company in my books" — 6,533 upvotes

    • Flair: News
    • Type: Image (screenshot)
    • Why it works: Emotional affirmation. People root for Claude vs OpenAI. Community sentiment.

  2. "Outside Anthropic Office in SF 'Thank You'" — 5,523 upvotes

    • Flair: Praise
    • Type: Video (people showing up at Anthropic HQ)
    • Why it works: Viral moment, community pride, emotional

  3. "Katy Perry subscribes to Claude Pro" — 1,575 upvotes

    • Type: Image, celebrity validation

  4. "10 Claude Code tips from Boris Cherny (Claude Code creator)" — highly engaged

    • Type: Text post, detailed workflow tips
    • Body: Full breakdown of 10 practical tips. Dense, useful, actionable.
    • Why it works: Practical value for power users. Tips from credible source.

Content patterns that work:

  • News/moments: things happening in the AI world that affect Claude users
  • Practical tips: dense, specific, actually useful workflow content
  • Community sentiment: celebrating Claude, criticizing OpenAI/competitors
  • Comparisons that favor Claude

What would get Signet traction here:

Best angle: practical workflow post Title: "Your ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md is a great idea — here's what happens when you make it portable" Body: Acknowledge that CLAUDE.md is useful. Explain the limitation (per-machine, Anthropic-only). Introduce Signet as the natural extension — same concept, portable, open source, works across tools. Include concrete example: what your AGENTS.md looks like, how it auto-loads in Claude Code.

  • Frame it as: "I loved what Anthropic built here and took it further"
  • NOT: "Claude Code's memory sucks, use this instead"

Also works: Posting in threads where people complain about memory/context loss. Natural reply with "this is exactly why I built Signet."

r/ChatGPT

Size: ~11,388,514 subscribers (massive) Vibe: Volatile right now. Strong anti-OpenAI sentiment. Users feeling betrayed by price increases, paywalls, enshittification.

What performs well (actual top posts this month):

  1. "Cancel and Delete ChatGPT!!!" — 36,216 upvotes
    • Flair: News
    • Type: Image
    • Body: "I think it's time to burn any bridges we had with ChatGPT, cancel your subscription... And if you have to, use an open weights model!"
    • Why it works: Channeling mass frustration at OpenAI. #CancelChatGPT energy.

Content patterns that work:

  • Anti-OpenAI sentiment (especially anything about pricing, data, access)
  • "I switched from ChatGPT to X" stories
  • Exposing OpenAI practices users didn't know about
  • Alternatives and open source options

What would get Signet traction here:

This is actually the PERFECT environment for Signet's fear/ownership message right now.

The "#CancelChatGPT" post having 36k upvotes means there's a massive activated audience who already feel betrayed. They're already asking "what do I do now?"

Post angle: Title: "ChatGPT has years of your memory, your habits, your health info. What happens to it if you cancel? (and what I'm doing about it)" Body: Describe the specific problem — you've told ChatGPT things over years. Your goals. Your health. Your way of thinking. And you own none of it. Introduce Signet as the "what I'm doing about it" — completely free, open source, your data stays on your machine. Keep it personal and direct.

Alternative angle: Title: "What happens to your ChatGPT memory if they raise prices to $100/month or you get banned?" Pure fear/urgency. Short body. "Asking for a friend who just looked at how much context they've built up over 2 years."

NEVER do here:

  • Technical explanations of how Signet works
  • Anything that sounds like a product launch
  • Developer jargon

Cross-Subreddit Rules

  1. Never announce a product. Show a tool, share a problem, tell a story.
  2. r/openclaw = show your work. Demo > words.
  3. r/ClaudeAI = practical workflow content. Tips and real usage beat hype.
  4. r/ChatGPT = tap existing anger. You don't need to create the emotion, it's already there.
  5. One post per subreddit per topic. Don't carpet bomb.
  6. Reply in threads > cold posts. Find existing pain threads and show up genuinely.
  7. Never mention "marketing" or "we're launching" language. Write like a developer sharing something they built.